Notes on a "Scandal"
The Aids Cabal is crowing glorious victory over their defeat of journalism, truth-telling, medical discourse and debate. That is, they’ve convinced the BBC to feel doubtful that the documentary “Guinea Pig Kids” should be allowed to stand, without correction from the pharma cabal that the film indicted.
John P. Moore of AidsTruth.org writes:
- “By now, the leading AIDS denialists will be aware of AIDS Truth’s latest victory: The acknowledgment by the BBC of the many flaws in the Liam Scheff-inspired documentary “Guinea-Pig Kids”, produced by Jamie Doran, attacking the use of ARVs to treat HIV-infected foster children at New York’s Incarnation Children’s Center. Full details of this victory for science, medicine and public health will be posted on the AIDS Truth website, where additional material will be added once the BBC finalizes its decision on the fate of the producers and editors responsible for the inaccurate and damaging documentary.”
- “Many AIDS professionals contributed to this fight against the BBC, although Jeanne Bergman deserves most of the credit.”
So, a few notes on the documentary in question.
It was released at the near end of 2004, in November. I provided what is called, original research, which really consisted of pointing to the National Institute of Health’s (that’s the US government’s) own database of clinical trials, and noting that the drugs they were using were Black Box labeled, meaning they’d caused severe disability, or death, in patients taking them.
And that these were being used in combination of 2, 3, 4, up to 7 at a time, “at higher than usual doses”, in children as young as 4 years old. That’s orphans, as young as four, and then, other drugs and vaccines, in infants as young as six months old. [Here]
The orphans at ICC were crack babies – boarder babies, left, abandoned at the NYC hospitals by addict mothers.
You can see the list of US government/pharmaceutical company-approved clinical trials here (in the second part), and ICC’s own words about who they are and how they got money for trials initially, Here.
The director, Milena Schwager, worked with input from the producer – the person they’re crediting with the film, the money guy – Jamie Doran, who took meetings, long meetings with the BBC, who told him what they needed to ‘sell’ this kind of thing. But they managed to produce a pretty good piece.
I’ve put some notes on the actual piece, with anything I differed with in the telling, Here.
I only worked on the first half of the film, providing the links to the clinical trials, and then to many of the contacts to be interviewed – the mothers who were having children taken, and the children themselves. We interviewed more than were shown in the film, and I don’t know how or why it was cut as it was, (they left out important stuff), except that it was only a half hour, and I suppose those are the devils of TV broadcasting.
I provided the research that pointed to the problems in the use of orphans in drug trials, and in these trials, specifically. Most of that work is summarized, or listed in the document “The ICC Investigation Continues.” [Here]
I worked closely with the director Milena Schwager, for many months. We worked very, very hard on digging up a great deal of evidence; most of it was just horrifying, the drug effects, the details of studies, the catholic cemetery where they bury the children, multiple bodies to a casket.
[Here. Search "guardian angel plot"]
And Here. (In this document, you can witness the death of a child at ICC: “In the end, the anti-HIV medicines that once helped have nothing to offer but their adverse effects.” What adverse effects? How were they once “life-saving” if now they don’t do anything but make him sick?)]
Celia Farber came in and worked on the second half of the film, which got it into its production status, so she can tell you about that. She worked on getting some of the death certificates for the children, and lining up and taking other interviews.
She wrote about a great deal of that (and more) Here.
Doran, the producer, didn’t want to entertain the idea that there was something deeply wrong with the Aids paradigm, as such; He really wasn’t interested in that information, but he seemed to care about the orphans and children being used in these trials, and seemed to feel that it was a considerable breach of ethics.
The situation was as it is; ICC is an orphanage where children of the poor and drug-addicted are remanded. And these children were and are being force-fed drugs, as part of regular “Aids drug” regimens (and taken away from parents and guardians, when they have them, who don’t want to enforce the drug regimens). The children were also used in a few dozen clinical trials.
The drugs were and are very poisonous drugs, to say the least. That’s no secret. Their status in the literature was and is well-established – their FDA Black Box labels tell the superface of their story.
That is, Doran, the producer, who held constant meetings with the BBC during production, was not a ‘denialist’, (to use the Aids cabal’s language for those who do not obey their ideological dictates). Nor was he in that intellectual place of questioning the medical paradigm to its roots. He did take a stand for these women and children who were being abused, and I appreciate that he did. That makes it an ethical movie, not a “denialist” movie.
Of course, there is no such thing as an “Aids Denialist.” This is a term invented by people like Jeanne Bergman and John P. Moore to hide and shield the miserable failings of the Aids paradigm from public criticism.
(Criticize us and we’ll liken you to a Holocaust Denialist! And we’ll tell everybody else that’s what you are!!)
So much for “science.”
These children were and are drugged without consent or restraint, and they told us, in no uncertain terms, that they wanted to be free of the New York poverty policing system. To be free of the Administration for Children’s Services, which polices children and parents who aren’t drugging them according to the Aids doctor’s orders.
That is, any Poor child’s parents. Poor, Only. They don’t do this on Park Avenue.
In New York, the ACS acted/acts as the goon squad, the enforcers for the hospitals and the drug regimens. The hospitals themselves, or ‘Aids departments’ specifically, are the engines of the Aids machine the poor neighborhoods of New York. They demand and force the taking of these drugs – AZT, Nevirapine, Kaletra, etc, despite all objections, morbid sickness, and all the rest.
So, a few notes on the ‘scandal.’
I’m not in contact with Doran, but I hope he has the good sense to refer the BBC magistrates to the US clinical trials database, and ask them why drugs that cause deformity, are being used on orphans in an orphanage, for the purpose of studying the deformity that they’re absolutely known and going to cause: [Here]
Or that seven drugs, all FDA black-box labeled, are being stuffed into children at one time, some “at higher than usual doses.” [Here]
I would hope that if the BBC apologizes for the film, for whatever non-reason they are forced to do so by the redoubtable “HIV activist” Jeanne Bergman, that they then sick Bergman on the NIH as well, to take down the rest of the evidence from the public books – all the clinical trials, stopped, that all these drugs would cease pumping through stomach tubes.
Because, if Bergman (who the Aids Cabal leader and NY Times hit-man, John Moore credits with beating the BBC TV department into submission)… If she thinks there is something wrong with the film, and its “claims”, then certainly there is something wrong with the NIH database, and it’s “studies” as well.
Because the controversy at the center of the film, is the controversy at the center of the US government’s and Pharmaceutical partner’s clinical trials with children (and adults), all over the country, and the world, on the poorest of the poor, with drugs that have and do kill adults (and children) AZT, Nevirapine, and their analogs.
Jesus Christ. We used to just think this kind of thing only happened in Germany, or China (under the Japanese invasion), in World War II. We cite I.B.Farben with being “Nazi Collaborators.” And now this is the gold standard of ethical behavior.
Gratis, “AidsTruth.org”. The most dangerous people on the planet to journalism, medical discourse, scientific debate, and human ethics, since a time we don’t want to remember.
Thanks for showing us who you are.