LiamScheff.com — The Conspiracy Realist

Conspiracy Theorist

3 Comments

    The issue of explosions and controlled demolitions of the twin towers is a red herring from the verifiable, undisputed evidence that indicts the real culprits behind the crimes of 9/11.

    Controlled demolition theories – as plausible as they are – have always been bounced back and forth between “dueling experts” like a tennis ball which ends in more confusion than you originally started with. Physical evidence arguments don’t win the minds of the public.

    Although it has become clear to me the public doesn’t want to – and never wanted to – know the truth about 9/11.

    peace eternal
    m>k<

    [Reply]

  • Any theory can be bounced to and fro between or among experts. No idea is immune to this prospect…

    But, you’re right – the public doesn’t want to talk about any of it.

    [Reply]

  • The people really should be talking about this, a lot more. There are growing groups of professionals who are applying their skills and risking their careers to ask some pretty hard questions. Look at what the architects and engineers, or the pilots, or the former military and government workers and more have to say.

    But most importantly, look at what remains of the physical evidence–photos and videos from multiple sources because the rest was swiftly loaded onto boats and sent to shores afar for disposal–and ask yourself reasonable questions.

    If what you see doesn’t look like what you’ve been told, then find out why. Find out what else doesn’t match up. The more you do this, the easier it will become to sift through the information and misinformation. Consider the standard TV crime show list of means, motive and opportunity, always follow the money and remember that someone is trying to lie to you most of the time; That should take a curious mind into some interesting territory.

    Cheers from Tokyo!
    Jeff…

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply