3 Comments
Leave a Reply
Tags: cartoon art, Collapse or Explosion?, comics, drawing, graphic novel, painting, sketching
January 8, 2010 3
Radio: Join me on "The Robert Scott Bell Show" Mon-Fri 12-2
Live: NaturalNewsRadio.com
Archive: The Robert Scott Bell Show + Liam Scheff
Radio Blogs
Listen in Apple iTunesA thing of beauty is a joy forever; its loveliness increases; it will never pass into nothingness, but still will keep a bower quiet for us, and a sleep full of sweet dreams, and health, and quiet breathing. Therefore, on every morrow, are we wreathing a flowery band to bind us to the earth, in spite of despondence, of the inhuman dearth of noble creatures, of the gloomy days, of all the unhealthy and over-darkened ways made for our searching...
Dear Christians: You don't own the concept of God.
Dear Jews: You don't own the concept of suffering.
Dear Atheists: When you worship the negation of a belief, you can't see a whole picture.
Dear Capitalists: You don't own the world.
..............Scientific Fundamentalism
by Liam Scheff
When science is wrong, and does not admit it, it does more damage than when religion is wrong, and does not admit it.
While religion brainwashed with ideas, science injects with heavy metals. While religion suppressed emotion and expression, science suppresses life itself, by creating terminator seeds. While religion offered palliative myths to large existential questions, science offers palliative care, with deadly drugs, to prove its failures true.
All fundamentalisms are dangerous, and perhaps evil. Science has reached a stage of fundamentalism in our society, where vaccination, HIV testing, and pandemic hysteria have achieved the status of occult objects, of religious ceremony.
Science, today, as it is practiced, from Big Bang theory, to Darwinism, to AIDS, to Vaccination, is a fundamentalism. And must be opposed, challenged, its weaknesses exposed and understood, and reformed around better, newer, more open, flexible ideas.
Science needs a Reformation.
Copyright LiamScheff.com — The Conspiracy Realist 2003-2011; All Rights Reserved. | WordPress 3.3 | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS)| Contact Us

The issue of explosions and controlled demolitions of the twin towers is a red herring from the verifiable, undisputed evidence that indicts the real culprits behind the crimes of 9/11.
Controlled demolition theories – as plausible as they are – have always been bounced back and forth between “dueling experts” like a tennis ball which ends in more confusion than you originally started with. Physical evidence arguments don’t win the minds of the public.
Although it has become clear to me the public doesn’t want to – and never wanted to – know the truth about 9/11.
peace eternal
m>k<
[Reply]
Any theory can be bounced to and fro between or among experts. No idea is immune to this prospect…
But, you’re right – the public doesn’t want to talk about any of it.
[Reply]
The people really should be talking about this, a lot more. There are growing groups of professionals who are applying their skills and risking their careers to ask some pretty hard questions. Look at what the architects and engineers, or the pilots, or the former military and government workers and more have to say.
But most importantly, look at what remains of the physical evidence–photos and videos from multiple sources because the rest was swiftly loaded onto boats and sent to shores afar for disposal–and ask yourself reasonable questions.
If what you see doesn’t look like what you’ve been told, then find out why. Find out what else doesn’t match up. The more you do this, the easier it will become to sift through the information and misinformation. Consider the standard TV crime show list of means, motive and opportunity, always follow the money and remember that someone is trying to lie to you most of the time; That should take a curious mind into some interesting territory.
Cheers from Tokyo!
Jeff…
[Reply]