Why Is This Building Still Standing (no. 2)

No hero of mine, this poor fool who pile-drove his plane into the IRS building in Austin…

But he did exactly that. And the building was, indeed, impacted by an airplane – a small airplane. Equivalent, I do not doubt, to a good deal of debris falling from a significant height. And there was a fire, a significant fire, as you may be able to distinguish in the news photos and video.

The carnage in Austin. Now, if memory serves, the precise thing to do is find out where he is from – and invade a neighboring country (or two) – and “democratize” it. Also, vilify all who practice his religion.

I am confused, however, why the customary action was not taken at the scene? That is, why did the FBI not seize and destroy all photo and video surveillance equipment within a mile or more of the scene? I would have thought that ‘tradition’ by now.

In any case, I do have a single question, and it is the following…

Or, first, this background information. I have it on the authority of the American Government, the CIA, FBI, Fox News, CBS, ABC, Time Magazine and the New York Times, that on that dreadful Tuesday in September, 9 years ago, three very large buildings in New York city exploded, imploded, and otherwise tumbled to the ground at free-fall speed – as fast as a baseball tossed of your garage roof with nothing in between but the cool winter air – leaving nothing but twisted broken fragmented metal that was, as quickly as you can flush your toilet, piled onto cargo vessels and shipped to India and China, where it was melted into red hot liquid, and remade into building materials…

That is, I have been convinced, by the power of persuasion by authority and force, that when a tall building has a fire in it, of any reasonable magnitude – say, on three to eight floors – the entire building will, by needs and with scientificistic proofs by retrospective analysis, tumble to the ground, falling at free fall speed into its own basement, leaving nothing standing above the height of Dustin Hoffman on the ground.



Why is this building still standing?



  1. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/22/inside-the-beltway-70128635/
    Inside the Beltway

    Jennifer Harper INSIDE THE BELTWAY


    A lingering technical question about the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks still haunts some, and it has political implications: How did 200,000 tons of steel disintegrate and drop in 11 seconds? A thousand architects and engineers want to know, and are calling on Congress to order a new investigation into the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7 at the World Trade Center.

    “In order to bring down this kind of mass in such a short period of time, the material must have been artificially, exploded outwards,” says Richard Gage, a San Francisco architect and founder of the nonprofit Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

    Mr. Gage, who is a member of the American Institute of Architects, managed to persuade more than 1,000 of his peers to sign a new petition requesting a formal inquiry.

    “The official Federal Emergency Management [Agency] and National Institute of Standards and Technology reports provide insufficient, contradictory and fraudulent accounts of the circumstances of the towers’ destruction. We are therefore calling for a grand jury investigation of NIST officials,” Mr. Gage adds.

    The technical issues surrounding the collapse of the towers has prompted years of debate, rebuttal and ridicule.

    He is particularly disturbed by Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper, which was not hit by an aircraft, yet came down in “pure free-fall acceleration.” He also says that more than 100 first-responders reported explosions and flashes as the towers were falling and cited evidence of “multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally 600 ft. at 60 mph” and the “mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking.”

    There is also evidence of “advanced explosive nano-thermitic composite material found in the World Trade Center dust,” Mr. Gage says. The group’s petition at www. ae911truth.org is already on its way to members of Congress.

    “Government officials will be notified that ‘Misprision of Treason,’ U.S. Code 18 (Sec. 2382), is a serious federal offense, which requires those with evidence of treason to act,” Mr. Gage says. “The implications are enormous and may have profound impact on the forthcoming Khalid Shaikh Mohammed trial.”

    Stay tuned for more in this space.

    Now read this:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *