ABC Uncovers 9-11 Truth?
ABC News “Nightline” program, which parades commentary about and by pop-culture prostitutes and occasional pandering, meandering war-coverage as serious news (where have you gone Ted Koppel?), pretended to cover a real and genuine cultural controversy on last night’s program.

Cynthia McFadden, Nightline Anchor – “Would I lie to you?”
“Inside a Truther Convention.”
“Chris Bury and producer Katie Hinman did just that this weekend — attending a convention in Valley Forge, Pennsylvania, alongside hundreds who share a collective distrust of the official explanation for the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
As they will report tonight, the attendees come from several different viewpoints, knitted together in this “movement” largely online.
We talk to conference organizer Betsy Metz, who tells us there is “absolutely a cover-up,” and the producers of “Loose Change” a conspiracy theorist film that is among the most downloaded videos in Google history.”
Indeed. Let’s ask this question:
How do you investigate a crime? How do you cover one up?
In the first case, a detective or investigator looks for clues to see how a crime occurred. In the second, when propaganda is being manufactured to avoid investigating a potential crime, those who are asking for an investigation to occur are themselves investigated, libeled, humiliated, and ‘discredited.’
Call it the Kremlin School of Journalism.
So, when ABC News investigates 9-11, what do they, in fact, dig into? The evidence in question? No, how could they? They don’t work for you, they work for their salaries. So, they ‘investigate’ the citizen activists who have real and empirical concerns about the official narrative, and libel them, and paint them red and black and blue. [Video]
ABC pretends to investigate the 9-11 controversy by pointing a wane spotlight, not at those who might actually hold some detailed evidence of how three buildings collapsed and or exploded at free-fall speed on that horrible day – but by asking a few citizen whistle-blowers if they were “conspiracy theorists.”
Huzzah. We can always count on the mainstream media to be the Pravda that it is.
Is that the end of the story? It has been revealed that the 9-11 commission itself now realizes that it was fed false information, misled, and badly.
9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon
Chairman of the 9/11 Commission Thomas H. Kean:
“FAA and NORAD officials advanced an account of 9/11 that was untrue…We, to this day, don’t know why NORAD told us what they told us… It was just so far from the truth.”
Vice Chairman of the 9/11 Commission Lee Hamilton:
“We got started late; We had a very short time frame…We did not have enough money…We had a lot of people strongly opposed to what we did. We had a lot of trouble getting access to documents and to people…So there were all kinds of reasons we thought we were set up to fail.”
These are the thoughts of the men who put in charge of sorting it out. What does it mean?
Here’s an interesting site: Patriots Question 9/11. I wonder if Cyntha McFadden or Nightline knows about it? Maybe you can email ‘em the URL. It’s probably too hard to find there at ABC News…
Radio: Join me on "The Robert Scott Bell Show" Mon-Fri 12-2




















abc news is of course one of the most reputable news sources these days **’
[Reply]