LiamScheff.com — The Conspiracy Realist

4 Comments

• 
• Bill
• Jul 29, 2010, 23:29
You have to remember the part where the anchor woman from BBC reported this building going down about half an hour before it actually did. I guess she got the memo and forgot to read the note that said: Warning, do not read this aloud on TV until AFTER the building has actually collapsed, otherwise people might wonder how you could know it was going to collapse before it actually did.
And Larry Silverstein, owner of the building forgot to read the note that said: Warning, in interviews try not to tell people that you ordered the building to be demolished, or in any way use any demolition terms in your interviews such as “Pull”. People might wonder why you are suggesting you ordered the building to be destroyed when the plan is to make them think it collapsed due to other means.
And then there is Dan Rather himself, who also forgot to read the memo that said: Warning, don’t suggest any of the buildings appear to be controlled demolitions because people might actually say…”Hey, yeah, you’re right! It does look exactly like someone simply blew them up with explosives.” We want them to believe other stories.
I know that I personally hate it when I make big plans for conquering the world and I send out detailed memos to my minions and they can’t be bothered to read all the notes explaining things to them.
[Reply]

Liam Replies:
July 30th, 2010 at 4:56 PM
And good old Peter Jennings, who I did like more than most of those folks. Who said (regarding the WTC tower (south)):
“We have no idea what caused this. Um, If you wish to bring, uh…anybody who ever watched a building being demolished on purpose knows..that if you’re going to do this you have to get at the…at the under infrastructure of a building and bring it down.”
Well, what does he know? He’s Canadian! Duh!
Or, Rudy “Benissimo” Giulliani, who said:
“I .. I went down to the scene and we set up a headquarters at 75 Barkley Street, which was right there with the Police Commissioner, the Fire Commissioner, the Head of Emergency Management, and we were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was going to collapse.”
“And it did collapse before we could actually get out of the building, so we were trapped in the building for 10, 15 minutes, and finally found an exit, got out, walked north, and took a lot of people with us.”
(Psst, Hey, get outta here, it’s gonna collapse…)
Foreknowledge – receiving information before an event takes place. Knowing the details of an unfolding plan.
So, you know. Go figure..
Co-inky-dinks, I’m sure…
[Reply]

Rosanne Lindsay Replies:
August 1st, 2010 at 1:29 AM
I liked Peter Jennings, too. I used to say “Goodnight Peter” after he said goodnight.
[Reply]
• 
• Bill
• Jul 31, 2010, 0:20
There are so many instances of people have foreknowledge it becomes just and endless string at some point. The evidence is overwhelming, yet so many people take the idea of 9-11 being an inside job too personally and for that reason, dismiss evidence and accept the official version.
I have found there are three camps. Those that see the evidence and are convinced 9-11 was an inside job. Those whom never question the government, ever and think Bush was a saint. And those who oddly agree with you when you point out the evidence but become emotional and give any excuse to believe the official story.
I am personally curious as to why people can see evidence but become so overwhelmed they have to walk away? Many of those whom I have talked to who buy the official story due to emotions, are mostly from New York. My parents are both from there, some of my friends, all of my relatives as well. In fact quite a few are fire fighters from Long Island and New York some of whom knew people who died in the towers. So I guess the whole story might have hit close to home.
What boggles my mind is when you ask someone if they think Kennedy was killed by Oswald alone and you get someone who says no, they think it was a government conspiracy and cover-up. You ask them about the Gulf of Tonkin and get a similar reply. You ask about Pearl Harbor and whether the government knew in advance, moved the carriers out just in time…? Fewer know anything about this, but now and then you get someone up to speed and they admit it looks like the government lied. Saddam having WMD’s? Nigerian Yellow Cake? Again, a lot of people who have at least read up a bit, can often admit these were all lies. Yet with 9-11 they get emotional. So they can see that the government routinely lies, often to get us in to wars, and though 9-11 seems to follow the same pattern, somehow they can’t accept it. Some do. More and more every day. But there are those I encounter who seem to take it personally.
I live with an engineer who builds houses, buildings, the whole nine yards. Interestingly, he is from Iran, the soon-to-be next target for our military escapades. He says without a doubt that those buildings came down by controlled demolition. He also says that people in the Middle East are fully aware that bin Laden is dead, and many wondered at first why the United States seemed to be the only one who didn’t know this fact, until they realized it was all a scam.
He has enlightened me about Iran and the nuclear program there. He admits that Ahmadinajad is not all that powerful, but when I said the Mullahs were the real power, he said no, the Republican Guards. And he believes Iran is indeed, through the Guards, trying to get nukes. I was fully certain the Mullahs were in charge and that no nuke program was going on, so I am still a bit uncertain. But this guy certainly knows the score, and he is a building engineer. My own father is an engineer, worked for a defense contractor for decades. When I asked him, he shut up. Those I talk to who have physics and engineering degrees either shut up or say it was demolition.
I also have an extra family, being adopted, that live in the Midwest. Fully Republican, bought in to everything George Bush said, thought he was brilliant and would never believe the government has ever lied, though they were not happy I was voting for an N-word to be in the White House who is obviously not a US citizen, is Muslim and racist and probably a liar and many other things. So perhaps now they might be open to the idea that government can lie, though when Bush was sitting on the throne, no chance!
There really are just three camps of people. Four if you want to go with those who see the evidence, accept the evidence, but will only agree in private, but in public will say nothing, admit nothing. But whereas I understand the 4th Camp, it is the camp of people who get so emotional they cannot take a rational position that I am interested in. That it couldn’t have happened because it happened near them, or to people they knew, or they just liked Bush too much, or whatever. No counter-proof (Actually I have never once heard any one provide any counter-proof to any inside job argument), they just can’t accept. And I find it hard to understand this.
[Reply]