Flu Vaccines – The Mainstream Admits, We Want an Epidemic!

by Liam Scheff

for the Robert Scott Bell show and Natural News

Listen to the discussion on the Robert Scott Bell show.

Vaccination is a near-religious plank of modern medicine. But what good is it to inject people with proteins and viruses grown in animal and human body parts and tissue, mixed with metals and dangerous, aggravating chemicals?

A new report from “The Lancet” medical journal gives some idea. New research on the value of flu vaccines states that the yearly injection is “only 60 percent effective.”

So, 60 percent of people who take the shot do not get the flu? [Link] What can this mean but that 40 percent of people who take the shot do get the flu?

The numbers that are being paraded are actually “59% effective,” leaving 41%, ‘not protected,’ I suppose, from the flu.

In an analysis of 31 studies published in Thursday’s issue of the Lancet Infectious Diseases journal, U.S. researchers concluded that since the vaccine often differs the from virus circulating each flu season, the effectiveness averages only 59 per cent in healthy young adults. [Link]

It was reported last year in the alternative health media (NaturalNews.com) , and even in the brainwashed junk-science worshipping media (NPR) – that flu deaths, far from reaching the 30 plus thousand per year, really hovered somewhere between Three thousand, and forty-nine thousand.

What? Somewhere between  three and forty-nine thousand? Do I get a free toaster oven with that estimate?

The real number may be as low as 1,000, as reported on the Robert Scott Bell show, by guest researcher Peter Doshi, who arrived at that figure by removing, from the CDC’s own statistics, cases in which death occurred because of “secondary complications.”

With a half-million people dying of prescription drugs in this country every year, you can easily bolster ‘flu deaths,’ with some of the deaths-by-medicine.

It’s all so dodgy that even NPR (or, as I call it “Neural Prosthetic Radio” because it gives you the illusion that you’re thinking) a news agency funded by agricorps and pharma mafia like ADM and Monsanto, Squibb and Pfizer, has no choice but to report that they have no idea how to report on the flu:

“We’re still mulling over exactly what we’ll say in our reporting – we definitely say “tens of thousands die from flu, on average, each year.” But whether we get more specific than that is still under discussion. Your ideas are welcome.”

Tens of thousands? But it might be 3,000. Or 1,000.

But if flu deaths are as low, by official estimates, as 3,000, and probably lower, then we have to look at flu cases, by their numbers.

If the CDC and pharma mafia get their way, 100% of the U.S. population would be injected with the monkey-kidney-aluminum-adjuvant brew (called a ‘vaccine’ to sell it better). In a population of 300 million, approximately, we would then expect what percentage of people to be “protected” from the flu?

The answer: 59%.

So, by their numbers, 41% of 300 million vaccinated people – or 123 million people – would get the flu every year.

Can we say “deadly epidemic?”

Half the U.S. population suffering influenza? Government shut-downs, police emergency, quarantine of schools, malls and public areas.

Cats and dogs sleeping together – True panic in the streets!

We can view the mainstream statistics for “the number of people who get sick OR die from the flu each year.” The CDC lists it as “Five to twenty percent” of the population.

“Flu seasons are unpredictable and can be severe. It is estimated that, on average, approximately 5% to 20% of U.S. residents get the flu, and more than 200,000 people are hospitalized for flu-related complications each year.” [Link]

Five to Twenty percent? I think I need a better estimate.

Will this number stick? Or will it be reconfigured in the coming months as health freedom doctors and activists put the screws to the numbers, and see what gives and what holds?

Let’s take their low estimate of five percent. Compared with 41% of the vaccinated group, this seems like a tremendous relief – even a blessing.

At 41% “non-protection” (ie, people who get the flu), we have a major national crisis. At 5%, spread out over a year, we have life as it has always been lived.

But the mainstream is jockeying for 100% injection, and therefore, a 41 percent failure rate. We can see by their own admission, that this is not only the inevitable result, but the intended result.

The short version: Every time you run to get vaccinated, you are enlisting yourself in a waiting crew of epidemic victims.

My advice to any who value their health: Do not inject yourself with poison. Instead, learn and study natural, whole food and natural supplementary methods of dealing with colds and flus. [Link and search your own]

 

Listen to the discussion on the Robert Scott Bell show.


Peter Doshi:

“Are US flu death figures more PR than science?” BMJ 2005; 331:1412 (10 December)
“Viral Marketing: The Selling of the Flu Vaccine.” Harpers Magazine. March. 2006.

Liam

6 Comments

  1. And here is the rest of the paragraph that you left out:-

    “Over a period of 30 years, between 1976 and 2006, estimates of flu-associated deaths in the United States range from a low of about 3,000 to a high of about 49,000 people.”
    …………………………………………….

    So “200,000 people are hospitalized for flu-related complications each year.”
    THAT’S 0.066 % of population – Big deal

    The CDC’s statistical data base sourced from all Health Care Centres, does not separate a simple visit to the ER from actual Hospitalization. ( FACT )

    90% of the stated 200,000 are ER visits by people without Medicare, who have contacted a cold or flu and visit the ER for their free OTC Meds.

    As for “Deaths ” ranging from 3000 to 49,000 !!! pick a number, sounds like a Lotto draw ( Could be Black or maybe its White )

    CDC statistical GARBAGE as usual

  2. What is the “safest option” if you are being forced by your employer to get the flu shot. Although I feel strongly about this issue, I cannot afford to loose my job. So I will be biting the bullet and getting one. There is the intramuscular, nasal and the regular vaccine. I want one without the thimerosol which leaves me with the intramuscular or nasal.

    Any help would be great.

    • If I were forced at the penalty of losing money, I’d get a lawyer and sue them. To your question, if I for some reason wanted a chemical vaccine, I’d choose to have something put into my mucosal layers, up my nose, than injected into my body, past all of my functional immune system.

      But, look. Lie to your employer. They’re lying to you. They’re forcing you to do something that they say helps, when all research shows only hurts. And can hurt badly.

      So, tell them you got it already. And if you need a doctor’s note, get a religious exemption. Don’t roll over. Blaze a trail. Go to court. Contact the OMSJ. Get a lawyer.

      Do you work in healthcare? Tell your employers that you’ll wear a mask. It’s been done in other cases…

    • My (healthcare) employer is mandating flu shots this year. I worked with a lawyer, Alan Phillips (vaccinerights com), to get a religious exemption. It was worth it to me to get a lawyer in this matter. Good luck to you!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *