Twinkle, Twinkle Electric Star – Official Stories Chapter Excerpt
The undeniable Intel Hub has just posted a new chapter excerpt from “Official Stories” by your humble narrator – this time we poke holes in NASA’s ass-backward theory of outer space. No, it’s not gravity only, filled with make believe and “invisible, undetectable” space monsters and ‘dark matter.’ It is ELECTRICAL in nature – an infinite power source which we can OBSERVE with our eyes and radio telescopes.
Stars are not ‘nuclear bombs in space,’ but rather are “anodes,” receiving points for the electron/plasma flow through space – how do we know this? Because they’re hotter ON THE OUTSIDE and far ABOVE THE SURFACE…
Have a look and see. With thanks to Bob Tuskin, Robert Scott Bell (where we’ve covered this issue on occasion), and the great researchers Wal Thornhill and the Thunderbolts group, who are advancing our real understanding of outerspace…
It’s not a mathematical abstraction – it’s a real, tangible phenomenon – electricity is what we’re made of, outside to in… inside to out…
READ THE ARTICLE AT theintelhub.com
- - - - -
Buy Official Stories Online, Ships Worldwide
Amazon.com in the US, UK and Europe.
Read (and write) reviews for “Official Stories”
Follow “Official Stories” on facebook
Radio: Join me on "The Robert Scott Bell Show" Mon-Fri 12-2
Can’t…stop…commenting!
The “information” we’re given about space, matter and the like by NASA, is essentially, functionally, a religion…a religion (or ‘dogma’, if ‘religion’ is too loaded of a word) for “agnostics”, for the most part. :-)
[Reply]
The big question then becomes, WHY DOES NASA feed us this BS about stars being nuclear bombs in outer space? They can’t be that stupid…can they?
I read your excerpt from the book where the z-pinch is briefly described as well as recreated in the laboratory. It sounds simple and logical. And if it can be reproduced in the lab, then do we need the “nuclear bombs in outer space” theory as far as stars go?
[Reply]