All Your Theories Are Wrong

TruthFrequencyRadio

On today’s show! Current theories (mythological frameworks) of science that are completely wrong:

AIDS theory.
Cancer theory.
Viral theory.
Genetic theory.
Darwinian evolutionary theory.
Big bang astronomical theory and its children:
Black hole, dark matter, dark energy ‘theory.’
Plate tectonics theory.
Vaccine theory.

Current social theories that are completely wrong:

Marriage for life.
Monogamy is natural.
Capitalism.
Nuclear family.
Prohibition (of intoxicants, plants).

Feel at your absolute liberty and leisure to walk up to any of your friends, acquaintances or colleagues and inform them of these realities:

“Oh, you still believe that? Vaccine theory was completely wrong! They’ve known that for decades! A century! AIDS theory? You’ve got to be kidding me! Was never true. Big Bang? Please! Grow up.”

Add your own. Argue it. Ask why. Read the critics.

Liam Scheff is author of “Official Stories,” drilling to the core of the gooey religious center of science.

Science is Fact!

Science is Fact

Science is fact!

• Fact is data, interpreted through a worldview.

Science is observation!

• Observation is subjective.

Science is measurement!

• Measurements are linear and limited.

Science is Truth!

• Nothing is all knowable.

 

—–

Liam Scheff is a journalist, radio host and author of “Official Stories,” because “official stories exist to protect officials.” 

© Liam Scheff 2014

 

But it’s Science!

“But it’s science!” “I don’t believe in myths! I believe in science!” go the common arguments against critics of science. But, what is science?

Science = “Interpretation of data.”

Data = “numbers collected and measured in a highly-limited and usually artificial, non-natural environment, which has been established for the purpose of creating numbers which serve a particular interpretation.”

Can you see where the trouble starts?

—–

Liam Scheff is a journalist and author of “Official Stories,” because “official stories exist to protect officials.” 

The Big Bang Religion

The Big Bang Religion
by Liam Scheff

Your Science Class Has Been Hijacked By Priests!

The Official Story about astronomy – the great big fib that you’re taught in school – is that ‘first there was nothing – which exploded,’ or ‘the big bang.’ Sounds a little crazy when you just lay it out – because it is.

This is not a testable idea, it’s not observable. It’s not scientific, in that it’s a myth, not an observation. How did we get stuck with it? Well, even scientists cling to ‘creation myths,’ and here they’ve created their own.

The Scientific Priesthood

Who invented the ‘big bang’ story? We never learn this in school. It was? A priest – Father Georges Lemaitres, in the 1920s. “First there was nothing, then there was everything.” Sound familiar? Because it is – it’s Biblical Genesis, redone with a little entirely hypothetical (unreal) math.

There is a competing model of the universe that offers a testable, resilient and observable set of principles – it’s based in plasma physics, or the physics of electrically-charged particles. This model doesn’t offer a creation myth; it instead focuses on what is visible and observable in outer space – stars, planets, galaxies, nebula, quasars, comets and asteroids – and applies the study of electromagnetics to them. And it comes up with a very impressive, predictive set of observations and data.

99.99% Pure (Plasma)

The Electric Universe (Plasma Physics) model predicts dozens of features not explained by the “whoops! it came from nowhere and blew up!” big bang religion. 99.9% of what’s in space is a “plasma” or a field of charged particles, which can receive or donate electrons – that is, they’re electromagnetically active, and carry the EM (electromagnetic) force.

That force is so much stronger than gravity that it makes you wonder why NASA ignores it. The EM force is 10 to the 39th power stronger – a thousand trillion trillion trillion times stronger than gravity. No small cheese, that. That is the force that compresses and charges stars into ‘arc-mode’ just like the plasma in a welder’s torch. It is the force that channels long filamentary currents across galaxies – these are called Birkeland currents and are inexplicable by the ‘big bang’ model.

The Big Bang model is gravity-only. It says that there was nothing, it blew up and out, for reasons no one understands, and planets and stars happen because of .. well. And that’s where they get stuck – because gravity is such a weak force. Even a balloon filled with a little heated air can break the bounds of gravity. How can this hold a sun together? How can it form planets and galaxies? Answer: it can’t – and the ‘big bang’ priesthood knows this.

But instead of looking at reality – electromagnetism – the big bang priests invented invisible super-charged space monsters to fill in the gaps. No, really. Invisible, all-powerful space monsters. Like ‘black holes, dark matter and dark energy.’ You’ve heard about them, but have you ever seen one? Has anyone? No. That’s their “mystery.”

These things cannot be seen, measured, or observed in any way. They have to be ‘assumed’ to be there by ‘inference,’ but only by the ‘experts’ in the field who believe the religion already…in other words, they were invented. They’re not real – and they’re not necessary when you allow that space is a Plasma – a field of powerfully-charged electromagnetic particles.

Bills to Pay

Does it all sound like something from the Medieval Church? That’s because it is. Worship the lies that we give you, or be a disbeliever! Black holes, big bangs! Ask no questions…(come to think of it, it all sounds a bit kinky.)

But who will say ‘the emperor has no clothes?’ Once you pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for your Ph.D. in “theoretical physics,” you’re not likely to go, “Shoot, this is all a bunch of crap!” You’ve got loans to pay, a job to keep, and a lot of pressure to go with the flow…

In this ancient way, the high priests gather round to protect their dogma from criticism, hoping and knowing that most people really don’t care much about what happens in science. They’re more concerned with money, bills and their own daily dramas. But for those who want this thing called ‘science’ to progress and get out of the dark ages, we have to bother ourselves to pay attention.

Science needs a “Reformation,” just as the Medieval church had. It needs to entertain debates about its most dearly-held beliefs so that better ideas can come to the fore, rise to the top, and help us understand the actual nature of the world we live in. Not some rehashed idea from a religious text – but something more useful to us, more accurate, that shows us how things actually are, not just what modern priests, with big censor buttons, would have you believe.

You can witness some of this censorship battle raging now, as the Electric Universe film project faces censorship on youtube. Follow that story HERE or visit the “Thunderbolts” FBIbook page.

I explore Electric Universe theory in Chapter 9 of my book, “Official Stories,” because “official stories exist to protect officials.”

 

 

CO2, Green Nukes and Climate Change. Or Not?

CO2, Green Nukes and Climate Change. Or Not?

by Liam Scheff

An Open Question

“CO2 Friendliness” is used by the nuclear energy industry to sell its very toxic products. “No CO2 emissions!” is the ad line that makes plutonium sound ‘green and good’ to environmentalists. And some well-known environmentalists have taken the bait (calling Steward Brand!)

The argument: Carbon dioxide, something we breathe out and plants breathe in (to make the oxygen which we breathe in, to make the CO2 that we breathe out (and they breathe in…you get the picture))…is bad. No – is WORSE than anything, ever, in the history of the universe. Or world. Or both. Worse than radioactive cesium,  xenon, iodine or plutonium (ie, the ‘fun’ molecules that come out of nuclear fission).

That’s the story the pro-nuke set likes to tell: Nuclear power is green! and, “No one was ever hurt by nuclear power!” they shout, (if you’d only stop thinking and listen!)

It’s Cheap and Green

But the CO2 argument gets them in the door: We don’t pollute!* (*with carbon dioxide), except when we mine, forge, ship materials, and construct our plants, which are as big as the Pentagon and Empire State Buildings combined! Each one! That’s good, they say, because it ‘builds the economy!’

Construction of a new nuclear power plant will provide a substantial boost to suppliers of commodities like concrete and steel and manufacturers of hundreds of components. For example, a single new nuclear power plant requires approximately:

* 400,000 cubic yards of concrete—as much concrete as was used to build the Pentagon
* 66,000 tons of steel—the same amount used to build the Empire State Building
* 44 miles of piping
* 300 miles of electric wiring—enough to stretch from Boston to Philadelphia
* 130,000 electrical components.

Source? Them! They say it. No, really! And they claim to be ‘carbon free!’ I know! Like cement, steel, copper and more cement, steel, copper and heavy metals and rare earths are… free! Of CO2 or otherwise. What a bunch of kooky kids, huh?

No Free Lunches in Engineering or Radioactivity

Of course, nuclear power is not CO2 free. It’s massive. It’s a behemoth, bestriding the land. And we’re not even talking the mining and processing of uranium. There’s a dream job, huh? Ouch. Don’t plan for retirement, it’ll come early.

So, why do they get away with advertising their CO2 friendliness? Answer: Because YOU let them. You, out there with your smug, environmentally-conscious, leaf-colored Macbook-carrying, citizen of Benetton shabby-chic, tight-trousered fashionistas and metrosexuals! You fakers, you. “You let them get away with this!” I say, in mock anger and disgust. Or, who knows, maybe it’s real. But let’s get beneath the surface.

CO2 is Bad. CO2 is Good. CO2 is Irrelevant.

Who can sort this out for me? I’ve never been overly hung up or impressed by the CO2 argument (as the cause of all temperature shift) because:

The data is so screwy, all over the place, and… it opens itself to ridicule so easily:

Study: “The earth would have warmed faster in the last two decades had there not been an unexplained rise in the amount of carbon dioxide being absorbed on land, scientists believe.” Scientists have discovered an “abrupt increase” since 1988 in the uptake of carbon dioxide (CO2) by the land biosphere, which comprises all of the planet’s plant and animal ecosystems…the breakthrough had taken scientists “completely by surprise”…[study] explains how much CO2 is absorbed by plants and animals, with some of the CO2 then being passed from plants into the land.” [End study excerpt]

Ecologist Dr. Moore pulled no punches in commenting on the new study: “These people are either completely naive about the relationship between CO2 and plants or they are making this up as a way of deflecting attention from the lack of warming for the past 15 years.” Moore is the author of the book, “Confessions of a Greenpeace Dropout: The Making of a Sensible Environmentalist,” in which he exposes the green movement and explains why he left the organization.

Moore continued: “We should challenge them to admit that CO2 is the most important nutrient for all life on earth and to admit that it is proven in lab and field experiments that plants would grow much faster if CO2 levels were 4-5 times higher in the atmosphere than they are today. This is why greenhouse growers pipe the exhaust from their gas and wood heaters back into the greenhouse to increase CO2 levels 3-5 times the level in the atmosphere, resulting in 50-100% increase in growth of their crops. And they should recognize that CO2 is lower today than it has been through most of the history of life on earth.

Well, it’s an angry quote, but… true or not true? Is it simply facile? Are the comparisons between now and “most of the history of life” incorrect? Is it irrelevant that plants grow faster in high CO2? Is the real argument – how does the atmosphere respond?

CO2 is Not the Droid You’ve Been Looking For

Let me offer this as a concept: the primary driver of weather is not carbon dioxide, oxygen, nitrogen or methane. The primary driver of weather is? The Sun, which is not a nuclear bomb in space, but an anode (receiving node) in an electrical system:

“The driving idea is that there is a linear relationship between CO2 increase in the atmosphere and global temperature. The fact, however, is that temperature has constantly gone up and down. From 1850 to 1970, we see an almost linear relationship with Solar variability; not CO2. For the last 30 years, our data sets are so contaminated by personal interpretations and personal choices that it is almost impossible to sort up the mess in reliable and unreliable data.” Link.

It’ll be a lot to wrap your head around if it’s new to you, but take in what we do know and can observe. The Sun is infinitely hotter (well, much, much hotter) on the distant outside than on or beneath the surface (beneath, visible in Sunspots).

Once again:

The Sun is hottest above the surface in the corona, where it’s 10 million degrees plus, versus the surface, where it is? Five to six thousand degrees. Why so hot in the solar atmosphere?

Because the Sun is heated from the exterior by the flowing currents of charged particles (plasma) coursing onto it. it is the collecting point – anode – in a galaxy-wide plasma electrical system – as are all stars.

Sound furry? Well, this is testable, observable and resilient, unlike “nuclear bomb in space” mythos, which leads to 100 unresolvable ‘problems’ with the mainstream hypothesis.

(Go do the reading before arguing endlessly with it – it’s in my book in Ch. 9, or free on the web: “electric sun hypothesis.”)

Yes, yes, you are hearing correctly. That is, indeed, what I’m saying: we get most of the sciences wrong, most of the time, as they evolved from 18th and 19th C. pre-existing religious notions. Back to outer space and you.

The Earth is a recipient of heavy plasma, electron and neutrino hammering – it’s also in the umbilical system of the Sun, as are all the planets, which demonstrate polar influx from solar plasma currents. Link. Link.

The Sun is the Major Driver – of Everything.

Weather, climate, mood ring results – it’s the Sun, the great, glowing “Son” of the heavens. The Alpha and Omega. The beginning and end. So obvious it lights your world, heats your skin, and makes the surface of this wet, rocky orb glow green with viney life.

On the other vine, CO2 and climate change predictions are, well…all over the freaking map. Search “climate change predictions, failures,” and you will discover an encyclopedia of fubar, from critics from all corners, deep outside to deep inside the mainstream.

So…help a guy out. Explain it to me. CO2 is or is not important in weather. Extend it to methane. (Methane? I’ll buy that as a heat-capturing gas – it’s flammable and being released by the ton from fracked wells).

Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

PS – first one to call me a ‘climate denier’ loses the integrity race, the ability-to-communicate race, and the help-a-brother-out-with-a-fair-question prize.

Watch Who You’re Calling Anti-Environment, Bub

I like early 20th C. civilization, town squares, public cafés, stone buildings, public gardens, Southern European architecture and human-scaled urban design. I do not like skyscrapers, New York City or Los Angeles. I like pumped water but I do not like fluoride. I like electric lights, but not everywhere, all night long. I do not love or really even like most industry. We could all live without plastics, if we learned to regard items as “valuable” and kept them for a long time.

I do like boats, trains and the ability to travel, but I do not like planes. (Yes, we all love the speed, but not the experience). I do not like cars. I do not OWN a car. I owned one ONCE, 20 years ago, for 3 months. I eat low on the food chain. Very. No big animals, no animals of any sort, presently. (Why does that matter? Because animal agriculture uses more land and water, consumes more grain, and produces more methane and, yes, CO2, than any other industry. So, figure out where you fit into that scheme.)

In sum, according to the rules that YOU have set out in the world, oh environmental elite — I am a better person than you are. (In the scope of Al-Gore approved behavior – never mind how he actually lives, of course).

You’ve heard the arguments. You have the question. Now, it’s up to you. Help a brother out! CO2 or not CO2?

Liam Scheff is the author of “Official Stories,” because “official stories exist to protect officials.”

Leave your comments here or on the FBI social network.

Conspiracy Realist Vs. Conspiracy Theorist – Front Row Battle!

The Conspiracy Realist versus Conspiracy Theorists! It’s a hot time on the PsoNick Aitchison show (Type 1 Radio Lounge) out of sunny Brighton, England battling out the Judy Woods concept of 9/11. Liam Scheff isn’t buying it – he’s detailed the 9/11 story in “Official Stories” Ch 4. But the crowd battles back with their arguments of energy devises and unknown Tesla machines. It’s a hot, hot, HOT conversation!

The talk then shifts gears to an exploration of the various conspiracy ideas of HIV and AIDS, and Liam weighs in with his 10 years of front-line research into the topic, featured in his book “Official Stories” (Ch 6). Then to Shakespeare, and finally Big Bang (MYTH!) and the Electric Universe (REALITY!)

Thanks to all for the opportunity and nice give and take!

“Official Stories Posters, v.1″ by Liam Scheff Now Available

Now Available!

“Official Stories Posters, v.1 by Liam Scheff. The first companion piece to Official Stories, an essential teaching and learning tool for classrooms – or wherever you’re reading it – and a sure conversation starter.

Liam Scheff OS Posters 2 b

The striking images in “Official Stories Posters” are not only visually stimulating – they are compact lessons in the history of the modern world. This 8.5×11 in. full-color, beautifully-printed book from author Liam Scheff describes an artist’s approach to investigative journalism by laying out big questions and answers in images:

  • “Did Shakespeare write Shakespeare?
  • Who invented “Big Bang” theory (is it a science, or a religion?)
  • Who were the Dulles Brothers, and who really killed John F. Kennedy?
  • Was polio really caused by a virus (or was it the DDT?)
  • Does HIV cause AIDS? Does HPV cause cancer? Does Gardasil stop it?”

In a careful reading of the posters in this book, the viewer can trace the creation of the modern pharmaceutical era – from the realities of vaccine history, to CIA, JFK and 9/11, to HIV testing and AIDS theory, to Shakespeare and the Big Bang, to HPV propaganda and more.

This the first companion piece to Liam’s ground-breaking book, “Official Stories,” and works perfectly with the text to illustrate, in colorful and striking words and images, that “Official Stories really do exist to protect officials.”

The images will make you think – and smile, too – they’re full of an appreciation for the comic-book pop culture that surrounds us and the propaganda we’re daily faced with.

“Official Stories Posters Vol. 1? is also an excellent – and perhaps essential – teaching aid for any class on the differences between what we’re told to believe, and what a serious researcher can find in verifiable, resilient evidence of what lies beneath in our heavily-propagandized culture.

Description: Book, 8.5×11 inches. Twenty-two full-page poster images, and 5 images as double page blow-ups (10 pages), for easy reading. Order Button

Table of Contents:
1. Creating HIV and AIDS
2. AIDS, Drugs, Antibiotics and Poverty
3. America is Built on Cannabis and Hemp
4. Pesticides and Polio
5. HIV and Sex
6. JFK and Oswald
7. Vaccine History
8. CIA – Dulles to 9/11
9. HIV Test Candy-land (Road of False Positives)
10. 9/11 Twin Towers
11. How HIV Causes AIDS (Ask The Experts)
12. HPV Shots? Not if I have anything to say about it!
13. Stop! You’re not injecting my children.
14. Koala – What Is In A Vaccine?
15. Road to Toxicity – Road to Health
16. HIV Test Warning Label (Warhol version)
17. What Is In A Vaccine?
18. Shaksper, not Shake-Speare.
19. The Big Bang Religion
20. Government Medicine – What Could Possibly Go Wrong?
21. Death In Its Many Guises
22. What Is In A Vaccine? (green variation)

Large format (double-page):

24. Vaccine History
26. HIV and Sex
28. How HIV Causes AIDS (Ask The Experts)
30. Creating HIV and AIDS
32. HIV Test Candy-land (Road of False Positives)

Liam Scheff OS Posters 2

Buy Official Stories Posters Here

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqSKIT23RlA

 

Part of the Whole

by Liam Scheff

The central operating premise at the core of what we call “science” is not to discover what is true; it is that religion (especially Christianity) is wrong.

“Where do we come from, how did we get here, how do our bodies heal and work?” These are the larger existential questions that religion used to try or pretend to answer – a task now performed by ‘science.’

20th and 21st C. science, as a philosophy, gets almost all of these questions wrong because it is not, as is often claimed, a progressive, forward-thinking philosophy; it is, in its heart, a regressive, reactive anti-philosophy.

Mechanical studies and engineering, generally operating more freely and in more practical applications than medicine, and driven by “market” and consumer demand tend to be much freer – so that we’ve seen the advance in silica machining (computer chips) and video and audio reproduction. But from astronomy to virology to ‘evolution’ and biology – today’s science has most of its attention diverted, without realizing it, on continuing to reject medieval Christianity. (Nothing can be intelligent; nothing has purpose, everything is dumb, ‘random,’ blind).

The grander “sciences,” which dare to tell us how to live, who to inject, who is infected, and what to do with them, is a church. In its fight to destroy its historical parent (the medieval church), it has usurped its position. Only when any need to prove or disprove a religion has left your being can you look at something and have the freedom to try to understand what it really is.

We’re deeply, truly stupid, as a culture, because we will ourselves to be. The universe is alive, thinking, feeling – we are nodes in its being. We are alive because it is alive. We think because it thinks. It thinks us. It is us, and we are a very small but quite real part of the whole.

Official Stories excerpt: Chapter 8 – Darwin is Dead

The Jet Stream Is Shifting – The Trouble with Haarpianity

Update Hour 2: Radio HAARP – Myth, Counter-myth or Reality? (right click to save and download)

The Jet Stream is moving – and it’s NOT HAARP. No, it’s a much more powerful electrical source: The SUN.

The worshipers of the “HAARP can do anything and everything anywhere and everywhere” church of magic realism don’t do much comparative research in their field. If they did, they’d find that the electrical nature of the universe, and solar system – and Sun – easily and readily (and better) explain what’s going on with the weather…

“Like most sciences, meteorology still considers the Earth to be an isolated body in space. It is not. It is a charged body moving through an active plasma environment, surrounded by a web of electric currents commonly called the magnetosphere. Earth’s surface and atmosphere are electrically connected through this magnetosphere to electrical conditions in space and on the Sun. Astronomers Sallie Baliunas and Willy Soon have shown that for as long as temperature records have been kept, the global temperatures of the Earth have correlated to the sunspot cycle. And the sunspot cycle also affects radio transmission and power grids.

The Electric Universe identifies more effects: Currents to the surface affect the jet streams, moving them closer to the equator when solar activity causes geomagnetic storms. These currents power thunderstorms, waterspouts and hurricanes. The image above is hurricane Frances in 2004. Its form is that of a plasma spiral, mimicking on a small scale the shape of a spiral galaxy and on a large scale the shape of interacting Birkeland currents in the laboratory.” (thunderbolts.info)

And again, for the cheap seats:

“Astronomers Sallie Baliunas and Willy Soon have shown that for as long as temperature records have been kept, the global temperatures of the Earth have correlated to the sunspot cycle. And the sunspot cycle also affects radio transmission and power grids.”

What the mainstream doesn’t understand is that space, and the Sun, are electrical in nature. The sun is a collecting ANODE for galactic ion current. It receives and expels more power per second that we could generate on this planet in millenia.

What controls the weather? It’s the SOLAR CYCLE? It’s the SUN. The largest SOURCE OF POWER ANYWHERE IN LIGHT YEARS. Let’s get on with gardening and living then. And please, stop the” HAARP lizard-people are destroying my salad” MYTHOS. That, (in my not so humble opinion) is a distraction from living, from focusing on what you CAN affect, what you can change…

Hey! It’s the Electric Universe! You’re soaking in it! Wake up and smell the IONS. We don’t need to invent a supercharged electric machine somewhere in Alaska to do what the SUPERCHARGED ELECTRIC MACHINE in space Already Does.

Or, read Chapter 9 of my books, Official Stories. It’s delicious, and nutritious! And quite friendly. You can even take it home.

Buy The Book

 

Amazon.com  | Amazon UK  | Amazon Europe (search title)

 

Astronomy Research

This investigation is expanded in Chapters 9 and 10 of “Official Stories”

A Story-Telling Species

Open a science textbook, and you will be greeted by this notion:

“First there was nothing…which exploded, or expanded, and became everything.”

This is called “big bang theory.” But it is not a theory. It fails the tests of what a true ‘science’ demands – it is not testable, reproducible or observable in experiment. It fails its own predictions.

It is, in sum, not a scientific idea. It is, in fact, a myth. And it sits in the throne at the head of the sciences – the Queen of the Sciences – astronomy. This rotten idea oozes downward through the layers of science beneath it – physics, chemistry, biology – covering all of what remains in dreck and confusion.

Why does a myth reside where a science should live? Why is there a “big bang theory?”

How does an idea come to be? Ideas come through people. Let’s ask the question: “Who invented ‘big bang’ theology?”

Answer: Georges Lemaître – a mathematician, and a priest. A Monseigneur, in fact, in the Catholic Church. A man who came to his vocation with a pre-existing script, a prior myth or story operating in his conscious and sub-conscious mind.

“First there was nothing…then there was everything.”

But why do we believe that there is such a thing as a ‘beginning’ of the universe? Can we see a beginning? Or do we simply desire a beginning of the story?

We are a story-telling species. All stories have a beginning, a middle and an end. The desire to know all parts is so great in us that we don’t mind creating the parts we cannot see or fathom, out of whole cloth.

Big bang theory is a model that cannot be tested – but for the sake of story-telling, it works perfectly. It is Genesis, remade with with just enough mathematical filligree:

“First there was darkness on the face of the deep; The Lord said, let there be light, and there was light, and it was good.”

“First there was nothing, which became everything.”

Same story.

Now, what’s really happening out there in space?

The Madness of Gravity

In the 17th Century, Isaac Newton proposed that an invisible force held the moon to the Earth, and the planets to the Sun. “Isaac, you’re crazy,” said his peers. “There is no invisible rope holding the moon to the Earth! That would resemble magic – and we are men of math and logic.”

And then Newton correctly described and predicted the trajectory of the moon around the Earth – and named the force that held it there – gravity. And his peers said, “Hurrah! Of course there is an invisible force holding the moon to the Earth, and the planets to the Sun!”

But Newton was clear in his thinking – “I frame no hypotheses,” he wrote, as to the cause of gravity. He observed the force, but did not know the source. And he did not pretend otherwise.

The Weakest Possible Notion

The force of gravity is weak – surprisingly so. You, grasping a cup or pen in front of you, can overpower the force of the entire planet on the object, and lift it in defiance of gravity. If you could build a stairway as high as the Earth’s atmosphere, (and you had a pressurized, oxygenated suit), you could walk out of the planet’s grasp.

Gravity is a weak force – it falls off quickly between two large bodies – at the square of the distance in inversion. Two distance measures becomes not half as weak, but one quarter the strength. Four becomes one sixteenth. 2 – 1/4. 4 – 1/16th. 8 – 1/64th, and so on.

Three quarters of a century later, the kindly Professor of Königsberg, Prussia, Immanuel Kant, built a ‘thought experiment’ based on Newton’s concept of gravity. Kant (and his peer Pierre LaPlace) decided that the solar system must have accumulated by the weak force of gravity, acting on dust and gas in an empty space.

Dust and gas, pulled together by a force that falls off with exponential weakness, forming ever-burning plasma fires in the sky, and the planets that circle them – is this testable? Is it reproducible? Is it observable?

Newton, Kant, LaPlace all lived in the era before humans put lightning in a bottle. Before electricity. Their model of the universe and solar system was limited by what they did not know – the electrical force.

Left – An artist’s rendition of how the galaxy formed. Dust swirled around and became planets. This is NASA’s current best scientific theory. Right – Immanuel Kant, NASA Engineer

Plasma – You’re Soaking In It

The universe is not made of nothings which explode; it is made, as are all things in it, of material – charged particles. Atoms and molecules which lose and gain electrons, and trade in them, creating electrical flow; and magnetic currents in space.

There are names for these currents, these rivers of plasma – Birkeland currents, Langmuir sheaths, double layers, magnetic pinches – all properties of charged plasmas, which are visible in the shape and energy signatures of nebulae, quasars and galaxies.

The universe is not an empty dead thing, it is not a hollow nothing in which ‘gravity’ exerts its weak force on objects, calls upon ‘black holes’ and ‘dark matter,’ and other make believe monsters invented by astronomers to make what doesn’t work – ‘big bang theory’ – make some semblance of sense.

The universe is powered electrically – the universe is an electromagnetic plasma, with more current running through a tiny fragment than we have figured out how to generate on earth in our modern era.

– Electrical currents in space

The electromagnetic force is exponentially stronger than the force of gravity, and it doesn’t emerge from large super-objects in space; it’s carried in the plasma current. The EM force is, at its maximum, about 10 to the 39th power stronger than gravity. It is a thousand trillion trillion trillion times stronger. Even in a dispersed plasma, where particles are far apart, the EM force is exponential magnitudes stronger than gravity.

It is the EM force which pulls stars together, and powers the electrical currents flowing through space. The EM force does more than attract, however, it separates, forms layers, divides, creates cell walls; it holds streams apart into distinct currents and cellular structures – precisely as today’s most powerful telescopes are able to see throughout the universe.

So What’s The Hold Up?

NASA scientists, who should delight in these discoveries, instead turn an icy shoulder to the electric universe, and remain dutiful servants to the 17th and 18th Century wind-up gravity models they inherited from Newton, Kant and LaPlace.

You couldn’t wake them if you tried – so it is up to all of us to do the work for them. Learn about plasma, the fourth – and most powerful state of matter. Read about the electric universe. Ask yourself the questions:

What are stars? Planets? Galaxies? What is weather? How are planets born? How do they develop, grow, change? How does it all work?

Ask questions… open your mind, expand your thinking, and read on…

Read and discuss in the cosmology blogs:

Plate Tectonics – Earth Science:

And here are some outside links to explore the topic – The Structure of Space:

The Shape of the Earth:




Evolution Research

This investigation is expanded in Chapters 8 and 11 of “Official Stories”

What is Life?

Evolution is an answer to a question – or an attempt at an answer. The question is: “What is the origin of life?”

Darwinism answers: “Accident.” Neo-Lamarckians (Epigeneticists) answer: “Feedback loops in a ‘thinking’ or at least responsive systems.” Spiritualists answer: “We’re manifestations of a cosmic, transcendent intelligence.” Biblical Creationists answer: “Yahweh.”

Some of us think we cannot ever really know the answer, not as an artifact or digit, a laboratory product – but that we can only observe the pattern of life as it unfolds. But we can weigh the current theories and ask after their validity.

Is “Yahweh” a fact, or a story? Can it be tested for? If not, then we have to get beyond any religious literalism in looking for answers.

But, is the world an accident, a giant “whoops,” as Neo-Darwinians suggest? Or does the world emerge in pattern and design?

Does all of life emerge from a series of mistakes, blunders, in a wind-up, mechanical chaos system? Are we ‘biological accidents’ whose highest calling is a struggle against death and a race to breed? Or does the Universe emerge in an endless matrix of form and energy, whose mysteries we have not begun to penetrate?

This is the question of our age, and a question that lies at the center of the fight for the soul of our culture. Darwinism, or Neo-Darwinism, today’s most popular and prevailing philosophy, states that the world is a machine brought about by cosmic stupidity – by accident. Opposed to this idea are those, like myself, who see a grander order in the Universe; a creative, and destructive, but transcendent force at work throughout.

Science is Religion in Inversion

Most of the sciences today are truly only inversions of the religious or philosophical notion that they sprouted from, in negation:

Christianity: ‘Life was created for a reason and a purpose.’

Darwinism: ‘Life was not created, and has no reason or purpose.’

These are inversions of the same philosophical position. Neither is a testable ‘science.’

The Debate is Over?

If life on Earth, and possibly elsewhere, gives evidence for a transcendent principle, that stimulates, creates, structures, orders, organizes, and recapitulates form and function, in all its variety….

Then science must be allowed to follow the evidence where it leads.

I hope you’ll join the discussion, and learn more about what Darwinism actually says, actually proposes – not just what you imagine it does.

Official Stories Promotional Posters

 

Buy The Book!

“Official Stories” available at Amazon.com, Amazon UK, Amazon Europe, Kindle, Mac, PC, Tablet

–        –        –

And don’t miss the Official Stories Poster Book – featuring 38 pages (22 full-page plus 5 double-paged) of 8.5×11 full-color posters to accompany and illuminate “Official Stories.” ©2013  (Read more) [Available at Amazon.com]

Twinkle, Twinkle, Electric Star – Official Stories Chapter Excerpt

In this excerpt from Liam Scheff’s “Official Stories”,  we’ll see how even NASA is getting it wrong. Yes, even astronomy, the “queen of the sciences,” is locked up in the same fictions that dog the medical sciences and the political landscape. If “official stories exist to protect officials,” what’s the official story of outer space? The answer: Big Bang “theory” and stars as “nuclear bombs in space.” Are either true? Let’s have a look beneath the surface…

The Official Story: Stars are nuclear explosions in space.

The Lone Gunman: Gravity.

The Magic Bullet: No one really has one yet.

When humans first saw stars, they felt what we all feel. It even has its own word: starstruck. We marvel, we beam, our pupils open wide to let in the twinkling light. We feel that someone somewhere out there is looking at us, looking at them. It’s a wonderful, transcendent feeling.

When natural philosophers first set out to make a model of stars, they looked at fire on Earth – campfires, coal fires, forest and oil fires – and decided that stars were the same thing, only way up there. When humans forced the atomic attractions apart and exploded those monstrous bombs, they rethought the “campfire in space” model and called stars “nuclear furnaces.” But neither campfires nor nuclear explosions relate to what data-collecting telescopes have told us about the Sun.

First, where is a campfire hottest: above the fire, or in the burning coals? Don’t try to figure it out with bare hands. The answer is, in the source of the energy for the flame – the burning coals.

Where is a nuclear explosion hottest: in the center, at ground zero or a hundred miles away? Visitors to Hiroshima and Nagasaki know the answer. All fires and explosions are hottest and most violent at their source of energetic origin – the center. Where would you expect a star to be hottest: In the center, on the surface, or high above in its upper atmosphere?

The surface of the Sun is about 5,700 degrees Celsius. That’s almost four times the melting point of steel – which is hot. But, it’s surprisingly cool when you think that it warms our little planet, 93 million miles away.

So, how hot is the center? No one knows – no one’s been to or seen the center of a star, but sunspots do give a shallow view beneath the surface. Sunspots remain a mystery to the mainstream. They are like moving craters in the Sun, depressions in the surface revealing a glimpse of what’s underneath. And what’s underneath is cooler, by thousands of degrees.

This isn’t how a nuclear explosion works. But it makes sense to plasma physicists, who see sunspots as points where the strongest current flow from the galaxy punches holes in the bright surface, pushing back the sea of burning arc-plasma tornadoes that make up the surface of the Sun and revealing a sub-surface thousands of degrees cooler.

Does it make sense for a nuclear explosion? The mainstream has no explanation for this, just some impromptu hand-waving about disconnected magnetic fields (without understanding their electrical nature) with the obligatory catchphrase: “Another anomaly – send more money for research!”

But 10,000 kilometers above the surface, in the Sun’s atmosphere, called the corona, for “crown,” the temperature heats up. Not to thousands, but to millions of degrees, two to ten million. The Sun and all stars are hottest far above their surface. Why would that be?

The answer is, it’s not a campfire. It’s plasma.

If space is a sea of charged particles, then what should stars be, but massive gathering nodes for electrical current. Here’s the model: electrical lines of current in space, converging in a plasma, burst into arc mode as they concentrate on a large, central sphere. The Sun itself is an anode – not the source of energy, but a gathering point. The space around it is superheated by the convergence of plasma power lines, which burst into lightning arcs, reaching millions of degrees in the corona. The power comes from outside of the Sun. Which is why it’s cooler beneath the fire on top.

And if you don’t believe it, understand that the official story admits all of this – the Sun is hottest far above its surface. They don’t have an answer – they call it the “solar coronal heating problem.” They add it to a long list of “problems,” and keep collecting coins for their going theory. It’s gotta be rough to be a tenured academic researcher. They might as well put a sign on their clubhouse: “No new ideas allowed.”

By the way, I once overheard my uncle, the AIDS researcher, talking about places of possible employment for a Ph.D. He remarked “Well, there’s always the NIH, they never fire you.” In other words, it’s nice to guard the clubhouse. Except for the rest of us.

Electric Stars

There are two researchers who’ve done more exploration of this model than any others I know of: Ralph Juergens, who devised the electric sun model, and Wal Thornhill, who pursued and expanded it and who introduced it to readers and researchers through his incredible essays at holoscience.com. I want to thank them both and I hope you look up their work. Ralph left the Earth behind in 1979, but look up his papers, I’ll bet he’ll appreciate it.

And here it is: the electric sun. Power-lines throttle through galaxies and converge in massive star forges. They increase in size and power and attract more and more material. Their attractive force increases as the particle flow becomes denser and brighter; it begins to scavenge local materials.

As plasma researcher Wal Thornhill told me in a 2010 interview:

“As far as we can see – and when I say ‘see,’ I mean that radio telescopes are very important in the electric universe because they can detect radio waves and detect their polarization.

The polarization of the radio waves allows you to map the magnetic field directions in space. Once you’ve done that, it’s a given in plasma physics that electric currents will flow along the direction of the ambient magnetic field lines. So in other words, you can begin to trace the circuits in deep space.

We find the galaxies themselves arranged like Catherine Wheels – that’s the great spiral galaxies – along intergalactic power lines, what are called Birkeland currents. They’re like giant twisted pairs of electric currents which flow through space.

In various places, if the density of matter – the gases and dust in space – are sufficient, these pinch down. It’s called a magnetic pinch [or z-pinch]. In pinching down, they scavenge the matter from the surrounding space and squeeze it, heat it, rotate it and form the stars that we see. They do that in a particular pattern which we can reproduce in the laboratory. That pattern is the spiral galaxy.

It’s an organic picture of the universe and it’s a connected picture. We’re not isolated islands in space. Stars are not isolated, they’re connected electrically and gravitationally. It’s a completely new way of looking at our place in the universe.”

The mainstream can’t get its head out of the 17th Century to examine electricity in space, but without it, they’re lost. The attractive and explosive forces in outer space are monumental. What holds galaxies together? What energy source drives the star forges? It’s not allowed to be electricity, that’s dinged from the start. Instead, it’s left up to old Immanuel Kant, again. Yes, NASA is back in the land of gravity, doing another thought-experiment.

Learn more about electric stars, the electric universe and more from CIA, JFK and 9/11 to Shakespeare and Plate Tectonics (and their public myths) in Chapter 9 of “Official Stories.”

Liam Scheff is author of “Official Stories,” because “official stories exist to protect officials.”

Buy Official Stories Online, Ships Worldwide

Amazon.com in the US, UK and Europe.

Read (and write) reviews for “Official Stories”

Follow “Official Stories” on FB(i)book

Official Stories (c) Out June 1, 2012

Official Stories
Counter-Arguments for a Culture in Need
by Liam Scheff

“Official stories exist to protect officials.” With the opening line as our guide, we’re going to pry open the vault of “official-dom” and see what lies beneath. Drawing information from 10 years of investigative journalism, Liam invites you to join the hunt for the details that lie just beneath the surface.

In this heavily-researched but irreverent book, we’ll look under the rocks and stones of our culture: From CIA and JFK, to 9/11 and Shakespeare; from Vaccination to HIV to Big Bang theory, and more.

We’re going to find out what’s real, what’s true, and what’s just an “official story.”

About the author:
Liam Scheff is an investigative journalist, radio host and stand-up lecturer on the contemporary myths of science, politics and culture.

He has broken national stories of pharmaceutical badness, been published widely in print and on the web, and has worked on and been featured in films that have not yet been banned by the state censors. To his credit, he’s also been libeled on the front page of the New York Times. (See Ch.6)

Find him on the web in print, on radio and in performance at liamscheff.com, reducetheburden.org, the FBI social network (facebook), and on the Robert Scott Bell show.

 

 

Electro-Biology to the Electric Universe – Video

Stars and planets are born electrically. Lightning is the electrical equalization of the planet with space, not ‘ice crystals rubbing together in clouds.’ And life itself is an electrical, field-directed event, not a gene-determined, reductionist dead end…

Liam Scheff and Robert Scott Bell talk about the paradigm-cracking new science of Electro-Biology – electricity shaping the formation of life in the embryo – and its natural progression to the Electric Universe: Stars, Planets and Galaxies formed from intertwining, coursing Electro-Magnetic currents.

The Electro-biology model signals the final death knell for the (long-dead) Darwinian and Neo-Darwinian models of biological transmutation; The Electric Universe ends the make-believe of Black Holes and Dark Matter, and unifies our understanding of the universe as an organic, electrically-powered, field organized living system…

We also discuss the HAARP controversy in light of our misunderstanding of the electrical nature of the planet and space. Find Liam Scheff on the web, and on radio, at LiamScheff.com.

Join National Radio Host Robert Scott Bell at NaturalNewsRadio.com daily from 12 to 2, and at RobertScottBell.com

Read more about the electrical universe at HoloScience.com and Thunderbolts.info.

Science is Modern Myth (Or, How “Arguable” Trumps “True”)

“Science does not have to be true to be accepted. It only has to be ‘arguable.’ In fact, it can be observed that the more arguable (the less plausible or logical) a scientific idea, the more funding it will require.”

What is science? It is modern myth, wrapped in technological diversion…

by Liam Scheff

We are asked to believe that ‘science’ somehow equals ‘truth.’ But today’s science functions exactly as myth did in the ancient and medieval world. Science is myth, but with the added dimension of experiment through technology.

Technology is tool-making, at an increasingly complex level. It is something humanity does by nature. We make objects into specialized tools. We are very good at it. We develop tool-making to a level of precision detail that is truly impressive. But technology is not ‘truth.’ It is an object – a manipulation of a material substance.

Today’s religion – science – dresses its myth in the garments of this highly-specialized tool-making. This makes it even harder to penetrate than the myths of old. By combining mythic belief with technology, we have invented a priestly class of ‘scientists,’ who cannot be questioned even by learned citizens.

“But science is proven by experiment!” I hear you cry. This is, at least, what we are told to believe. If something that can be ‘experimented’ with – by playing with volumes of liquid, metal or gas – it therefore must be “true.” We even define the term with itself – it becomes “scientific,” which we use as a synonym for “accurate” or “true.”

But what if the central theory in which the experiments are based is false? Then the experiment does not reveal a deep truth, only a deepening confusion.

Let’s take an example from today’s scientific priesthood. “The Big Bang.” The start of everything. Is this a ‘scientific’ idea, or a myth?

Astronomers today believe, like the priests of old, that the universe formed from nothing – a null point – which somehow burst into being — everything! They call this hypothesis “The Big Bang.” To quote author and satirist Terry Pratchett, “In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded!”

Is this a new idea? It is as old as human society. It is the exact mirror of the Biblical Genesis – ‘First there was nothing, and then God turned on the lights!’ So how did Big Bang Theory come to be regarded as science?

The idea of a ‘scientific Genesis’ emerged in the 1920s, from an astronomer named Georges LeMaitre. This stargazer was more than a mathematician – he was also a priest, a Monseigneur in the Catholic Church. Abbé Georges LeMaitre was devoted to his math, and to the ancient myth of Genesis, and wanted to reconcile his two pursuits.

He arrived at his ‘scientific’ studies with a pre-existing myth in hand: “First there was nothing, which became everything.” He postulated that a ‘cosmic egg’ was the source for the universe. His hypothesis was at first rejected, for being so transparently Biblical. But, then, a funny thing happened.

Scientists who had abandoned the old myths for the myth of ‘pure science,’ began to support this barely-disguised notion. They formed proofs, set up complex mathematical structures, opaque to the layman, which argued, ad nauseum, a “somehow” that was confounding enough to keep critics at bay.

And today, all astronomers are stuck with this notion – an untestable recapitulation of the Biblical creation myth.

But Big Bang ‘theory’ can be disproven by a grade-school student, if he or she is permitted to think about it critically for a moment. First, it is not testable. It can’t be proved, or observed. This is a bad place to start a theory…

Second, it predicts a uniform, homogeneous shape of the universe. But the universe is arrayed along traveling ‘clumpy’ power-cords, Birkeland currents of electromagnetically charged and shaped material, coursing through space.

Third, it is said to be ‘proven’ by observing a quality of stellar light called “red shift” and “blue shift.” The idea was that red light was always moving away, and that blue was always approaching. In observation this turns out to be false, and red and blue shift seem to indicate a more complex energy dynamic, and not simple distance.

But you see, we’re already under the microscope, arguing sub-theories. This is how today’s science – and yesterday’s religious dogma – confounds the mind and silences critics.

If the theory is wrong – not testable, clearly based in a pre-existing mythic notion – then how can a quality of light be correctly interpreted to support one and only one idea? Answer: It can’t. Not realistically, not with a clear head. Not logically…

But it can be argued, to eternity.

Our major scientific theories are rarely true, but they make up for it by being “arguable.”

“In the beginning there was nothing – which exploded!” “Now,” Say the Ph.D. candidates, “Let’s argue thirty fragmentary points till dawn, and return no wiser than when we started!” Goes the old college cry. “Let’s talk about nothing for years – for decades! And collect grants all the while…”

And this is precisely what is happening in graduate schools today. We’re funding a thousand circular and bottled arguments about entirely mythical, and quite illogical propositions.

Take your pick from the “Science Bible”:

  • “Injecting children with proteins and chemicals drawn from animal cells and industrial labs protects them from illness.”
  • “HIV is a singular wily, fragile, ever-shifting particle; it is the cause of all of the illnesses called AIDS.”
  • Nothing exploded, by accident, (which is why we’re all here).”

Are any of these true? Not in the details. Not when examined in context. But they all breed a torrent of argument.

The ability to be ‘argued’ to distraction makes up for missing the central point, by having ten-thousand technical sub-arguments for every (incorrect) major thesis…

AIDS, plate tectonics, Big Bang, Darwinism, vaccine ‘theory’ – take your pick. They are all contradicted by observation. They are all entirely consistent with pre-existing dogma and myth. But they are all protected from criticism and hidden behind a thousand layers of highly technical, jargon-heavy ‘sub-theories’ meant to excuse the failings of the overriding idea.

Science does not have to be true to be accepted. It only has to be ‘arguable.’ In fact, it can be observed that the more arguable (the less plausible or logical) a scientific idea, the more funding it will require.

In other words, a failed hypothesis, like “Big Bang theory,” which managed to gain popular support within the scientific priesthood, is even harder to challenge than a truly new and revolutionary idea – because it will be defended by a generation of researchers, whose reputations would be incinerated if the theory were to die a public death.

The worse off a popular theory, the more it can be ‘argued,’ the more ad-hoc ‘solutions’ or rubber patches can be applied, the more research grants written to “unravel the continuing mysteries”…the longer a rotten idea stays afloat.

But for most of us, challenging the priesthood is uncomfortable. We need our myths. And so, for the most part, we don’t disturb the myth-makers with devastating questions or serious criticism.

But we are silent at our own peril. What we don’t know does hurt us, when scientists create massive public policy campaigns based on broken ideas. We pay in taxes to support their research, and with our health as we suffer the results of their gross misunderstandings.

We can do better. We have to ask ourselves to increase our level critical thinking concerning the pronouncements of today’s science. We must think more deeply, more argumentatively, about what we are told, if we want today’s “great truths” to be more accurate than yesterday’s dogma.

Further Reading

The Other Model of the Universe (Are You a Child of Saturn?)

by Liam Scheff

Today’s astronomers ask us to believe that the universe emerged, by accident, from a null point – a nothing – which expanded or exploded, and slowed, and sped up, and now is doing something confusing…

They call this the ‘Big Bang': First there was nothing, which exploded.”* (How Biblical!)

boom!

The model continues down its path. Stars and planets were formed when dust balls somehow piled up and became nuclear furnaces in space (stars), or rocky globs rolling around them.

This model was proposed by various philosophers, including Immanuel Kant, in the 1700s. And it is what NASA holds to be true, 250 years later. The trouble is, none of these ideas has proven testable, and none has proven true by observation of the universe through modern telescopes.

Left – An artist’s rendition of how the solar system formed. Dust swirled around and became planets. This is NASA’s current best scientific theory of how the Earth came into existence. Right – Immanuel Kant, NASA Engineer

Electricity Versus Gravity

The “Big Bang” model is based entirely in the notion that gravity, a very weak force, is the only power at work in all the universe. Astronomers have no idea how gravity works, or what powers it, only that it exists. Gravity is a force whose power of attraction falls away at the square of the distance (it weakens exponentially with distance). But NASA misses the forest and the trees. Outer space is not ‘gravity only;’ it is electrified plasma.

Space plasma is a low-density mix of atoms and molecules, in which electrons are stripped from atomic nuclei. The nucleus becomes a positively charged ‘ion’ and the free electrons are negative ‘ions.’ These charged particles attract, repel, squeeze and shape material in outer space.

Space then, is a web, a field, a series of flowing, layered, pinching, rotating currents, rivers and oceans of charged, powerful particles. Powerful because the attracting force does not fall off at the square of distance. And the electromagnetic attracting force is 10 to the 39th power stronger than gravity.

That is, the attraction in a plasma is 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times stronger than gravity to begin with, and does not fall off quickly, but only with distance, not distance squared.

In this universe, then, gravity is not king, or even queen. Plasma and electromagnetism rule – but NASA has not rolled the Big Bang model over yet, and so does not figure this reality into its 18th Century model of stars and planets.


– Electrical currents in space

The Plasma Model of Planetary Formation

There is an alternative argument to this 18th Century ‘gravity dust accumulation’ notion of planet and star formation. The theory goes like this: Small rocky planets aren’t dust balls that slowly build up, but are born in one piece, ejected from stars, in a process of electrical fissioning. That is, stars expel, or really give birth to planets, and even other smaller stars.

There is astronomical evidence to support the theory: Stars that were single, suddenly revealed to be twin suns, as though one split or was ejected from the other. Add to that the very high number of binary (twin) stars in general, indicating this electrical ‘fissioning’ is a common phenomenon. And gas giant planets (or low-glow stars) appearing where they should not be – in close orbit around larger suns – indicating that they were fissioned or split off of the larger, brighter star.

And then there is the plenitude of tiny ‘planetary’ systems – rocky moons, asteroids, and debris rings swirling around our gas giants – Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. The great rings of gas giants, and those circling nearby stars may, in fact, be cosmic ‘afterbirth’ of mass expulsions and fissioning of material.


– Saturn’s Rings – Gravitationally Attracted Debris or Expelled Planetary Placenta? (Credit – NASA)

What does this mean in our Solar System? If the proposed model is true, then the small planets around our current Sun – Earth, Venus, Mars, Mercury – were ejected from Saturn or Jupiter, and stolen by the larger star at a later point in time. And that our odd assortment of gas giants in the outer solar system may have been captured by our larger sun at intervals, electromagnetically.

The model is called various things; “The Saturn Myth” among them. It is interesting, as it is embedded in the observation of the universe as an electrical field, a plasma sea, charged particles forming an endless series of circuits.

It is, in that sense, testable, or at least, testable by observation, and in laboratory experiment with electrified plasma. The Big Bang and ‘gravity collapse’ model of stars and planets is not. It’s a ‘singularity.’ A one-off, a stunt. Or, at least, nothing like it has ever been observed.

Star Birth, and Planets Too?

Astronomers observe that stars are formed in the hot dense plasma ‘forges’ of nebulae. And, the competitive theory argues, planets are born – ejected – from red and brown dwarf stars.

In the words of Plasma Cosmologist Wal Thornhill:

“The smallest and coolest stars are known as red or brown dwarfs. Astronomers view them as “failed” stars but by flaring and forming polar jets they refuse to lie down. The reason is simple. All stars continue to receive electrical energy from the galactic electrical umbilical cords that gave them their existence. And the flaring of brown dwarfs signals the birth of a planet.”

The model then goes like this:

The inner planets were ejected from one of the gas giants in our current solar system. They were satellites of that gas giant.

To quote Thornhill:

“At different times in the dim past, Earth, Mars and other satellites were ejected from their flaring parent brown dwarf star to form a compact planetary system within the extensive anode glow of their star. That dwarf star drifted into the huge electrical environment of a much larger star (our current Sun), which switched off the red anode glow of our dwarf parent and forced it into the role of a discharging cathode, or comet, drawn toward the Sun.

That gas giant dwarf star (ie Saturn, Jupiter) came into proximity of a much larger star (our current Sun), which drew the ion flow, and reduced the glow of the dwarf star.

Hot Jupiters
– Jupiter or Star? Both… Note, the scale of this artist’s image is incorrect; the glow of a brown dwarf is huge, and, to quote Thornhill, “is able to accommodate orbiting planets within a natal cocoon.”

The model of stars here is electrical. These large electromagnetic bodies are the anode, the receiving end of a galactic flow of electrons – charged particles. This means that stars are not nuclear bombs in space, but rather electrical collection or attraction points. Is it so? If stars were heated from the outside, then they would have to be hotter on the outside than on the inside. Hotter still above the surface, where electrical power lines converge.

Stars are Hotter on the Outside?

Astronomers, faced with realities that they cannot fit into current models, fudge and fidget and stuff them into unresolved “problems.” Here is the uncomfortable observation: Stars, and our sun, are hotter, by a factor of millions of degrees, far above the actual body, than on or below the star’s surface. Astronomers call this the “solar corona heating problem.” And they cannot explain it by their model. They try, by breaking all laws of heating and physics, but mostly, they ignore it, and hope nobody notices. (So, pay attention).

But it makes sense in the plasma model. Stars are anodes – receivers of galactic charge – and the circuit lines, running as a plasma through space, converge on the stellar body, bursting into the bright glow of ‘arc mode’ plasma, of varying intensity and color. So, let’s bury the fiction of ‘dust clumping together to form nuclear furnaces.’ We have a better model: Stars are electromagnetically driven bodies, and not ‘nuclear bombs.’

Sun - hotter on the outside
– The Sun’s temperature increases with distance away from surface, then drops off.

So, where does that leave us?

Plasma researchers, looking at ancient human civilizations, have come across a series of repeated motifs, or etchings, images, cave-paintings, all around the globe, at the same historical point. They look like – well, you can have a look – kind of like oddly dancing human, or quasi-human forms. And then a series of concentric circles. And then a pillar reaching up to the sky, where those circles are.

And these researchers make some interesting points.

The dancing men look like plasma discharges in space. They look entirely like the shape of a plasma torus or a predictable, reproducible shape of electric current flowing through space, as seen from a distance, from one angle or another.

The concentric, and then off-center rings look like an alignment of planets in an ‘eclipse’ formation; but figure large in the sky, and were so stable so as to burn into memory worldwide. That is, they were so often repeated, goes the hypothesis, that they were a constant figure, and therefore were drawn, sketched, carved, and became central figures in world mythology.

Hesitations…

I was a little averse to the above theory when I first entered a study of plasma cosmology. But I will admit it has a strong attraction over time. The idea that Earth has changed dramatically is evidenced in the different gravity the planet has, or must have had, if dinosaurs once roamed the Earth. Paleontologists will tell you that the beasts were too large to function or even exist in current gravity.

Too Big to Fly
– Too Big to Fly (Gravity was Less Powerful)

The presence of forests in the Antarctic, of great polar shifts, of mass extinctions, of global catastrophe, all struggle to find a rationale in any current explanation. But they can be understood in a volatile, electrical universe.

Couple these observations with the worldwide fascination with the pillar building to the sky, worshiping the plasma charged passing bodies – mythologized or interpreted as sky gods, issuing thunder and lightning… it builds in the mind, and perhaps the mythic memory.

Plasma Men
– Dancing Plasma (Credit: Anthony Peratt, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science)


– Wheels in the Sky (Credit and Copyright: Rens van der Sluijs)

In any case, please have a look into it. At least for the plasma science – it’s resilient, testable, and makes sense of the world we live in, from the microscopic to the interstellar, where our current gravity-only models fail entirely.

Fissioning Stars, by Liam Scheff

– Fissioning Stars, artwork by Liam Scheff

Further Reading

Thanks to Wal Thornhill, Michael Gmirkin and others for a helpful proof-read and suggestions.

* To paraphrase Terry Pratchett: “In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.”

Global Warming is a Fraudulent Science Because…

Global warming is a fraudulent science, not because weather patterns do or don’t shift or change, but because ‘scientists’ have no clue as to how large weather patterns and phenomena, including major shifts over time, are formed.

They regard the Earth as a stand-alone unit; but Earth is in the solar electric circuit, and affected in large measure by the ion (current) flow of the sun, and the larger galactic circuit. Current weather models involve only hot and cold ‘pressured’ air, but no electrical input. Big difference.

Electric Weather

Take a little time and familiarize yourself with the overarching concept: We are in an electric circuit. Strong and weak electrical discharge form major weather patterns. They are equilibrations of charge. That CO2 and other molecules play a role is likely, but they are not the major engine of weather phenomena.

We have tornadoes on Mars, where there is no ‘hot and cold, wet and dry’ air to contend with. Why do they arise? Because they are electrical discharge phenomena.

The ‘scientists’ now flirting (or making) airborne deposits of metals into the sky (as is contended by many) to ‘stop global warming,’ are simply poisoning the ground below.

Electric Weather Phenomena Video

Global Warming in a Climate of Ignorance

Dust Devils on Mars

Dumping Metal into the Sky

Radio This Weekend – The Official Story

Join Liam Scheff and guests for this weekend’s radio shows:

Listen live or download MP3 for later, on the Intel Hub.

Toll Free Call In Number: 1 (877) 598-8549 or 646-727-3387.

  • Saturday 2PM EST: Treating Vaccine Damage. Liam welcomes special guest April Boden, mother of a vaccine-damaged child, and author of Aydan’s Road to Recovery. Are there solutions and treatments that can help reverse vaccine damage?

Thinking Critically about conspiracy theories on the Investigation with Liam Scheff

  • Are there conspiracies? What is a conspiracy?
  • What are the essential qualities of the human species that define us?
  • Curiosity, acquisitiveness, tribal hierarchy? Belief, myth, logic?
  • Is it useful or realistic to talk about “illuminati?” The great big “They” who do all evil in the world?

We explore and answer many of these questions… Right Click and Save to Download or Clcik to Play

Vaccines are not magical. They are made of …….. Do you want to know? ……!!!!

Scientific Fundamentalism
by Liam Scheff

When science is wrong, and does not admit it, it does more damage than when religion is wrong, and does not admit it.

While religion brainwashed with ideas, science injects with heavy metals. While religion suppressed emotion and expression, science suppresses life itself, by creating terminator seeds. While religion offered palliative myths to large existential questions, science offers palliative care, with deadly drugs, to prove its failures true.

All fundamentalisms are dangerous, and perhaps evil. Science has reached a stage of fundamentalism in our society, where vaccination, HIV testing, and pandemic hysteria have achieved the status of occult objects, of religious ceremony.

Science, today, as it is practiced, from Big Bang theory, to Darwinism, to AIDS, to Vaccination, is a fundamentalism. And must be opposed, challenged, its weaknesses exposed and understood, and reformed around better, newer, more open, flexible ideas.

Science needs a Reformation.

Radio This Weekend – The Grand Chessboard is Full of Holes

Join Liam Scheff and guests for this weekend’s radio shows:

Listen live or download MP3 for later, on the Intel Hub.

Toll Free Call In Number: 1 (877) 598-8549 or 646-727-3387.

This weekend: 9/11 and the Middle East, Vaccines and Autism, What is Weather?

  • Monday 2PM ESTA History of Vaccination. From smallpox and Dr. Jenner’s cowmaidens, to Polio and AIDS, we’ll walk through a history of vaccination. Follow along with Dr. Andrew Maniotis’ vaccine timeline: [Click]

Call in with your questions and comments. 1 (877) 598-8549 or 646-727-338

The Grand Chessboard

Are you anxious about Egypt? About the IMF announcing that the US Dollar is yesterday’s currency?

Are you still glad that “we” invaded, destroyed and occupied Iraq and Afghanistan. Did you just KNOW it would go well?

Or, were you among the tens of millions in the streets saying, “This is not going to go well. We don’t invade sovereign nations. We are going to create blowback and instability like we’ve never seen. And it’s going to cost us everything.”

Hm. Can’t remember. One of the two.

Oh yeah… I wrote it down.

I apparently said:

This confused logic is okay with the Imperial Left, who doesn’t care about Bush’s whacked-out religious and personal ideologies. They’re too busy imagining a Middle East governed from Washington and what that will mean for our economy.

But this dream is pure delusion. Managing a warring scattering of unconfederated tribes will keep military on the ground and dying interminably. Even if the US manages to forge a Middle Eastern empire, we’ll still lose (and lose more than we have already). Oil is a finite resource.

I have a feeling the American public will need to experience either the effects of a prolonged Middle Eastern war or the privations of a cracked and broken economy before they start wringing their hands about the wisdom of empire-building.

Wow! Neat. Do I get a prize? A get-out-of-hell card?

No… I remember now. Those of us who protested the war were ridiculed and ignored. Right! Mocked and belittled and spit upon and called Godless communists, and more colorful terms.

It wasn’t that we simple played out the scenario two steps ahead. No, couldn’t have been that. We “hated America.” And that’s why we weren’t in favor of endless war in the Middle East….

What is irritating is hearing the right wing talk show hosts (those I tune in to), scream about the instability in Egypt, and the lack of direction of US foreign policy regarding the Middle East.

They were screaming for blood and “democratization” of Iraq, for God knows what reason, and to render Afghanistan into a ‘parking lot.’ And now they want intelligent Middle Eastern policy?

Here it is:

Get out of the Middle East, get a working immigration policy that values the people who are HERE more than the people who are newly arriving; and learn to deal with a changing energy infrastructure at home.

That means localizing energy production, breaking up massive grids, handing over more power and control to individual States and communities to determine what works for them. And getting the Federal Gov’t out of health care and wealth management.

But, I predict hat the US Gov’t will increase its intrusion into the lives of Americans, as we all get poorer and more anxious. I predict that more of us will stand up in opposition, too.

I predict, as can anyone paying attention, that the US Military, (or Blackwater) will remain in Iraq and guard the passage of oil to the Gulf, as long as there is sufficient oil to guard. The powers-that-be won’t want it in the hands of the Muslim Brotherhood. It would’ve been nice if they’d thought one step ahead of “mission accomplished.”

The Right Wing certainly tarred and feathered you if you weren’t on the “kill ’em all – er… bring ‘democracy’ to Iraq” paddywagon. And the Left certainly jumped in for the ride to insanity.

Bankster gangster neo-Cons. And crack-head coward shitbag neo-Libs. They fooled a lot of milder citizens and politicians into the whole delusional undertaking.

The Grand Chessboard. Right.

Plant a garden. Get a gun license. Build your local community. Get out of desert cities. Those are going to dry up. Learn or develop skills that are useful in communities – building, repair, gardening, cooking, childcare, sewing, computer and electrical repair… We’re going to be relying on each other more than we have in a long, long time.

Next Weekend:

Treating Vaccine Damage. Liam welcomes special guest April Boden, mother of a vaccine-damaged child, and author of Aydan’s Road to Recovery. Are there solutions and treatments that can help reverse vaccine damage?

How Life Came to Be – My Rough Draft

I’m jotting this down, so that when it gets stolen, and somebody wins a Nobel prize for theoretical physics, or some such thing, you’ll be able to point back and say, “Oh yeah, wasn’t Liam saying something about that?” This comes about over years, with a great debt owed to the following:

Rupert Sheldrake, who pointed out the problems with Darwinism, and offered a ‘field theory’ of morphogenesis.

Wal Thornhill and the Thunderbolts.info group, who made it clear and apparent that the universe is electric, that stars are electric, that they fission and spit out gas giants (or red and brown ‘dwarf stars,’ which in turn fission and spit out (or expel) rocky planetoids).

So, in a few words, a rough draft of my major hypothesis.

How life happens

People, especially Christians and Darwinians, love to argue about how life came to be.

Christians: The all-powerful Creator did it.

Darwinians: It was all dumb luck, there is nothing creative about it.

It’s not difficult to see that these two emerge from one philosophical argument. They are the same notion in opposition, on a single coin – A coin minted by religious literalism.

One embraces the universe as alive, in a sense, but also “created” or set into motion, in a describable moment. The other rejects the idea that “creativity” or the presence of “mind” existed at all. But, they accept and in fact, rename, that ‘describable moment,’ from “Genesis,” to “The Big Bang.”

These are two views of the same mythic description.

In review, Christians are more correct, but wrong in the details – that is, they embrace a literal reading of some rather confusing texts, to guide them through their understanding of what a ‘creator’ must be. And literal reading of myth is never a good idea.

The Darwinians have simply inverted the Christian theme, ie: “We don’t believe in your idea of God; therefore there is nothing creative about the universe. It’s all ‘random chance, happenstance and dumb luck. Flip of a coin, and so much pollution, etc.”

All of these notions, though – ‘chance, randomness, coin flips,’ etc, are all based on a human, anthropomorphic projection or understanding of life. That is, before you can have a ‘coin flip,’ you’ve got to have:

1. A Universe
2. A solar system
3. Gravity
4. Life
5. People.
6. A mint that produces flippable coins.
7. And hopefully, some clothing for the coin flipper. And everything that attends. Food, industry, society, machinery, bureaucracy, corruption, media, and socks.

So, what is ‘random’ about a ‘coin flip?’

If you think I’m missing the point, and that all of what they offer is “analogy,” then let me correct you, and them, and explain that analogy is a construct of mind. And mind is what Darwinians fudge about the margins trying to erase.

But, it’s no good, and even they’ve had to give in to “neo-Lamarkism.” ie, the thing is smarter than we are, and is so actively. So say the new reports, “Darwinism” is dead. (And, “long live Darwinism.” – ie, we were wrong! But we remain right!)

But, never mind the politics. That’s short-term stuff. The universe is intelligent, it is thinking – it is thinking us. Clever semantic games about ‘accident’ and ‘chance’ are only that. So, let’s get away from either worshiping Christian literalism – or making a religion of rejecting it, as the Darwinians do.

The Universe is Alive

Evolutionary theory is moribund, because it does not understand what the universe is, and so cannot see the larger connecting forces, or energetic sources.They believe in Newton’s dead, wind-up universe – a gravity-only device, run like clockwork.

But that’s not what the universe is. (Well, what is it, you grumble!). It’s electric – electromagnetic, in fact.

The universe is an electrified plasma. Plasma is a field of charge-separated particles. That is, atoms in which electrons have left, leaving a positive core (a positive ion), and in which the freed electrons form a negative ion.

In a charged plasma, magnetism and electricity are king and queen. Movement is constant, flux is the rule, and there are patterns that follow the energetic pathways of ‘plasma’, the fourth, (or really, first, by volume), state of matter.

The patterns of plasma are seen in all natural phenomena: They are helical, fractal, tubule, branching, and cellular.

Electromagnetic (EM) current flows in sheets, and in winding helices, called ‘Birkeland currents.” These wind around each other, attracting closer and closer, and scavenging or drawing in more material and energy.

They don’t collapse into one undifferentiated clump because EM currents, unlike gravity, Repel, as well as Attract. They repel at a near point, and attract from a across great distance.

– Plasma structures in space and around planets

Genesis or Big Bang?

Some people imagine that they can put a date on the beginning of time. I am not one of those people. I think we have to accept that it is simply not in our ability to see such an event. We witness, in the universe, an endless and growing system of filaments, each formed from millions of galaxies, in a single network, with uncountable stars formed in galactic forges. The universe, as far as we know and can tell, has always been. And we have as much chance as unraveling the “how” of its existence, as an ant has of explaining the origins of the human species to an owl. Or, worse. I’d put my money on the ant, before we ever come up with an answer.

You may find this to be a flaw in the theory – an unknown and unknowable non-variable. A given. The universe “is.” I think that is more realistic than saying “nothing exploded, or, er, um… expanded.” And more honest than a literal reading of “God said ‘turn on the switch,’ and so the switch was turned on – 6,000 years ago!”

Let’s leave metaphor behind as much as possible. I accept that the universe is, and that its origins are unknowable. I’m willing to call it, ‘eternal’ from our point of view. What powers it is out of our reach to know or explain. But it is powered, of that there can be no doubt.

How Life Comes From All Of It – My Hypothesis:

Let’s review. The universe is not dead, quiet, empty, cold and silent. It is a living, breathing, pulsing star forge and inter-galaxial network of current. We have electromagnetic ropes millions of light years long; we have a cellular, living and breathing shape and nature to the ever-growing, threaded, filamentary universe. Information, then, is carried with ease, everywhere, all the time.

I consider, in loose terms, the entire project to be a carrier of a kind of digital signal. I think that the signal ‘unwinds’ or manifests, in the rather holographic world of water. That is, through the prism of H2O, this digital signal unravels, and expresses itself.

That signal is, in a real sense, timeless, or as eternal as the universe, carrying the impressions or information from the eternity of expression. Upon winding into, through and around a ‘new world,’ – a warm and, here’s the most important bit – WET – rocky planet in the anode glow of a friendly star, that signal is split into variety, by the nature of the liquid. The liquid doesn’t have to be water; I’m sure many liquid states would do.

The ordered and creative formation of matter from energy is first evidenced in the fractaline, helical formation of the elements, which express or manifest in crystalline patterns. These, binding with liquid, driven by the electrical circuit of the universe, give rise to hybrids; joint ventures between a variety of elements. These, in turn, binding with or forming a shell around or vessels holding liquid, H2O on Earth, form mechanisms to “digest” electricity; often by first re-routing electricity into ion borrowing and lending machines.

None of these forms or patterns originated on any given planet. The pattern of formation is inherent in the EM signal, manifested in varieties depending on environment.

No Accidents. No Pure Invention. Only Innovation

Darwinism has it that life originates by a bizarre series of universal gaffs, from the creation of a duck’s webbed feet to the origin of the universe itself – it’s all a big mistake.

Christian or Biblical Creationism believes that the universe is intentional, and that it was created in a particular moment, by a particular God, and that its creation is unique.

What I’ll call “electric evolution” argues a very different concept. Life is no accident; it is endemic. It is not unique, and was not a one time creation by a Prime Mover; it is an eternal, energetic process, some of whose mechanisms can be deciphered, analyzed and modeled.

Life doesn’t “evolve” as much as it “unfolds.” It traces patterns in the embedded signal, but makes alterations based on local topography, geography, geology, chemical and physical environment.

It does this with respect to the gain and loss of material, through time; access to energy and building material; the structure and nature of those available materials on any given planet; the energy provided by the local star; and the change in local environments, over time.

That is, all of Darwinism is wrong – life does not accidentally come into place. It does so willfully, or, by its nature. But neither is it ‘created’ in a model form, as Christians, and even those seeking a ‘Platonic ideal’ might imagine. It comes into being, with reference to all that has preceded, or that is contemporary with it, but with respect to the particular matrices (minerals, crystalline patterns, liquid sources) on the wet rock in question.

There will always be similarities in all life forms. The desire for growth will always express itself in similar form; so will the need or desire for locomotion create analogous forms, and limbs; analogous over distance, inexplicable by Darwinian material reductionists.

Life unfolds in a building process, from small to large, over time, in increasing complexity and diversity. But, an irreducible complexity is present at the outset, because life doesn’t start from nothing; nor does it start ‘stupidly,’ or by accident. Life is never, ever a “simple” structure.

A single-celled organism is more complex than a fighter jet. The “simplest” creature is beyond our ability to design and manufacture as a machine run on batteries.

But, we will never know the origin of the code. We can only study and witness its unfolding.

Limitations

This theory is untestable in many places; we can’t visit other planets. But we can observe how and where life occurs here, and we can see the analogous forms repeated throughout all that exists, over and over and over again.

If we take the universal energy source as a given, then do we also take as given the collection of elements? If matter is already in place, and directed by EM currents, then how is EM energy directed and divided in a liquid? What is the nature of water? Can this ‘prism-ing’ concept be tested?

Another limitation for further study: I can’t tell precisely where the signal is embedded, or how precisely it is un-encoded from its carrier wave, or energy source. If research energy were directed toward this venture, we might spot that signal. Or, we might find it is everywhere, and does, as I contend, ‘unravel’ in a liquid prism. Perhaps the signal IS the energy that we view as the EM force. As sunlight, as all of it.

Perhaps the energy flow itself simply unravels and, in the prism/holographic state of water/liquid, becomes that driving, energetic, ever-altering re-creation of what we call life.

But, the whole thing is alive, of course. That’s the point…

In Summary

The universe is electrical, and from our perspective, infinite. We cannot spot the beginning or end. We can only see local phenomena in a galactic system. Life is the expression of the digitally-encoding band of EM energy, or thought, or creativity, through the prism of liquid, on a wet, warm, rocky planet in the anode glow of a friendly (suitably stable) star.

Life occurs everywhere that these conditions are met, and unfolds over time, through a repeated process of “building up” from the simple, to the complex, by re-using form over and over again, in what Rupert Sheldrake describes as “nested hierarchies.”

I predict that those needing a “beginning” to feel secure in understanding how life “evolve” (or really “unfolds”) will be perpetually out of luck; or worse, writing new myths to deal with their insecurity and need for a narrative.

For your consideration. The Nobel committee can send me a check in advance, for whatever turns out to be entirely correct.

Government Medicine – Who Is Responsible? Radio This Weekend

Join Liam Scheff and guests for this weekend’s radio blitz!

Listen live or download MP3 for later, on the Intel Hub.

Toll Free Call In Number: 1 (877) 598-8549 or 646-727-3387.

This weekend: Vaccine history, What is Weather?, and HIV testing and medical authority – is any of it real?

  • Saturday 2PM HIV testing and the medical authority – who is responsible for what the official government medical offices say? OMSJ report – “Medical Authority to You: Don’t Trust Us!” Special Guests: Investigator Clark Baker and heavyweight world champion boxer Tommy Morrison [video].
  • Sunday 2PM – Natural care for a cold. Liam has a cold and talks about natural remedies that he uses that speeds it along; plus other nearly coherent ramblings.
  • Monday 2PM ESTWhat is “The Investigation.” Liam discusses the show, and how you can participate, support the show and get involved.

Call in with your questions and comments. 1 (877) 598-8549 or 646-727-338


Tune in next weekend for:

Electric Weather? What is weather? Is it hot and cold air, and high and low pressure that forms lightning and tornadoes? Or are these electrical phenomena? [Electric Dust Devils, Electric Weather  1 | 2 | 3, Electric Rain, Electric Tornado 1 and 2]

Radio This Weekend: What is AIDS? What is Space? What the…??

Join Liam Scheff and guests for this weekend’s radio-marathon!

Listen live or download MP3 for later, on the Intel Hub.

Toll Free Call In Number: 1 (877) 598-8549 or 646-727-3387.

  • Sunday 2PM – “What is AIDS?” Cracking the conspiracy – Liam fields questions from special guest Sandy Fleming from UFONaut, about the diagnosis, the cover-up, and the solutions to the world’s biggest medical scandal.
  • Monday 2PM EST – “Nazi Panic Attack!” How to deal with the government’s natural inclination toward screaming panic during the upcoming economic shocks, and how to avoid the FEMA camps, or make the best of it…Join Liam for an open line segment – call in with your questions and comments. 1 (877) 598-8549 or 646-727-3387

ARAS.ab.ca/test | HIV Testing Section at RTB

Radio This Weekend – Space Monsters, Charles Darwin and Vaccine Horse Hockey

Listen live or download MP3 for later, on the Intel Hub.

Toll Free Call In Number: 1 (877) 598-8549 or 646-727-3387.

Saturday 7PM EST
– Join investigative journalist and researcher Liam Scheff as he delves into NASA fictions: Black Holes and Big Bang theory. Is anything NASA spends your tax money on real? Or is it a case of hypothetical “monsters in space?”

Sunday 7PM EST – What’s wrong with Charles Darwin? An introduction to thinking critically about evolutionary theory.

Monday 5-7PM EST – We beat the hell out of the vaccine myth! Two hours of revealing the giant fraud known as the vaccine industry.

Radio Expanding Earth!

Radio This Weekend!

Saturday Dec. 11, 2010, and after that downloadable for your MP3: This Expanding Earth! Geologist and philosopher of science, Don Findlay discusses the effects of spin and expansion on the planet… this GROWING planet, argues Findlay, with great, compelling evidence. We will also take a bite out of the myth of Plate Tectonics, and talk about the rotten borough that is the sciences today… Read Don Findlay’s writings at his websites, EarthExpansion.blogspot.com, which links to his premiere website at indigo.net. Don Findlay grew up in Scotland. Graduated with his doctorate in structural geology from the University of Glasgow in 1971. Entered the mining industry in Western Australia the same year. Has provided independent contracting/ consulting geological services in Perth since 1986. LiamScheff.com

Click to Listen and Download

Sunday: 15 Questions for Jon Stewart! Click to Listen

When Jon Stewart, “America’s Most Trusted Man” is asked questions about the free-fall implosion of WTC building 7, or the violent pulverizing explosion of the entirety of both steel and concrete megaliths of the Twin Towers… or about any other facet of the 9/11 staged attacks, he answers with the following:

“I don’t know…Because I think Al Qaeda did it?”

But is that a sufficient answer to the questions left for us, in evidence?

Tonight we comb through the pile of rubble, and the mountain of evidence, to see what American journalists fail to report when they parrot CIA and Bush Administration fairy tales about that bloody Tuesday in September. Click to Listen and Download

Read 15 Questions for Jon Stewart at LiamScheff.com

And, for your edification:

33 Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out To Be True, What Every Person Should Know…

by Jonathan Elinoff
New World Order Report
January 6, 2010

Article with links LINK

1. The Dreyfus Affair: In the late 1800s in France, Jewish artillery officer Alfred Dreyfus was wrongfully convicted of treason based on false government documents, and sentenced to life in prison. The French government did attempt to cover this up, but Dreyfus was eventually pardoned after the affair was made public (an act that is credited to writer Émile Zola).

2. The Mafia: This secret crime society was virtually unknown until the 1960s, when member Joe Valachi first revealed the society’s secrets to law enforcement officials. What was known was that organized crime existed, but not that the extent of their control included working with the CIA, politicians and the biggest businesses in the world.

3. MK-ULTRA: In the 1950s to the 1970s, the CIA ran a mind-control project aimed at finding a “truth serum” to use on communist spies. Test subjects were given LSD and other drugs, often without consent, and some were tortured. At least one man, civilian biochemist Frank Olson, who was working for the government, died as a result of the experiments. The project was finally exposed after investigations by the Rockefeller Commission.

A short video about MK-ULTRA from a documentary called Secrets of the CIA:

4. Operation Mockingbird: Also in the 1950s to ’70s, the CIA paid a number of well-known domestic and foreign journalists (from big-name media outlets like Time, The Washington Post, The New York Times, CBS and others) to publish CIA propaganda. The CIA also reportedly funded at least one movie, the animated “Animal Farm,” by George Orwell. The Church Committee finally exposed the activities in 1975.

5. Manhattan Project: The Manhattan Project was the codename for a project conducted during World War II to develop the first atomic bomb. The project was led by the United States, and included participation from the United Kingdom and Canada. Formally designated as the Manhattan Engineer District (MED), it refers specifically to the period of the project from 1942–1946 under the control of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, under the administration of General Leslie R. Groves. The scientific research was directed by American physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer.

The project’s roots lay in scientists’ fears since the 1930s that Nazi Germany was also investigating nuclear weapons of its own. Born out of a small research program in 1939, the Manhattan Project eventually employed more than 130,000 people and cost nearly US$2 billion ($22 billion in current value). It resulted in the creation of multiple production and research sites that operated in secret. With the total involved, this makes it one of the largest conspiracies in history. Entire towns were built for short periods of time, employing people, all under secrecy and top national secrecy at that. The government never admitted to it, the media never reported on it, and people had no idea for over 25 years. Project research took place at over thirty sites across the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.

The three primary research and production sites of the project were the plutonium-production facility at what is now the Hanford Site, the uranium-enrichment facilities at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and the weapons research and design laboratory now known as Los Alamos National Laboratory. The MED maintained control over U.S. weapons production until the formation of the Atomic Energy Commission in January 1947.

6. Asbestos: Between 1930 and 1960, manufacturers did all they could to prevent the link between asbestos and respiratory diseases, including cancer, becoming known, so they could avoid prosecution. American workers had in fact sued the Johns Manville company as far back as 1932, but it was not until 1962 that epidemiologists finally established beyond any doubt what company bosses had known for a long time – asbestos causes cancer.

7. Watergate: Republican officials spied on the Democratic National Headquarters from the Watergate Hotel in 1972. While conspiracy theories suggested underhanded dealings were taking place, it wasn’t until 1974 that White House tape recordings linked President Nixon to the break-in and forced him to resign.

8. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study: The United States Public Health Service carried out this clinical study on 400 poor, African-American men with syphilis from 1932 to 1972. During the study the men were given false and sometimes dangerous treatments, and adequate treatment was intentionally withheld so the agency could learn more about the disease. While the study was initially supposed to last just six months, it continued for 40 years. Close to 200 of the men died from syphilis or related complications by the end of the study.

9. Operation Northwoods: In the early 1960s, American military leaders drafted plans to create public support for a war against Cuba, to oust Fidel Castro from power. The plans included committing acts of terrorism in U.S. cities, killing innocent people and U.S. soldiers, blowing up a U.S. ship, assassinating Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees, and hijacking planes. The plans were all approved by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but were reportedly rejected by the civilian leadership, then kept secret for nearly 40 years.

Author James Bamford, “A Pretext For War”, discusses the declassified “Operation Northwoods” documents revealing that in 1962 the CIA was planning to stage phony terrorist attacks on the US and blame it on Cuba to start a war:

10. 1990 Testimony of Nayirah: A 15-year-old girl named “Nayirah” testified before the U.S. Congress that she had seen Iraqi soldiers pulling Kuwaiti babies from incubators, causing them to die. The testimony helped gain major public support for the 1991 Gulf War, but — despite protests that the dispute of this story was itself a conspiracy theory — it was later discovered that the testimony was false. The public relations firm Hill & Knowlton, which was in the employ of Citizens for a Free Kuwait, had arranged the testimony.

It turned out that she had taken acting lessons on request of the CIA and was actually the niece of a major politician in Kuwait. Nayirah was later disclosed to be Nayirah al-Sabah, daughter of Saud bin Nasir Al-Sabah, Kuwaiti ambassador to the USA. The Congressional Human Rights Caucus, of which Congressman Tom Lantos was co-chairman, had been responsible for hosting Nurse Nayirah, and thereby popularizing her allegations.

When the girl’s account was later challenged by independent human rights monitors, Lantos replied, “The notion that any of the witnesses brought to the caucus through the Kuwaiti Embassy would not be credible did not cross my mind… I have no basis for assuming that her story is not true, but the point goes beyond that. If one hypothesizes that the woman’s story is fictitious from A to Z, that in no way diminishes the avalanche of human rights violations.” Nevertheless, the senior Republican on the Human Rights Caucus, John Edward Porter, responded to the revelations “by saying that if he had known the girl was the ambassador’s daughter, he would not have allowed her to testify.”

11. Counter Intelligence Programs Against Activists in the 60s: COINTELPRO (an acronym for Counter Intelligence Program) was a series of covert, and often illegal, projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at investigating and disrupting dissident political organizations within the United States. The FBI used covert operations from its inception, however formal COINTELPRO operations took place between 1956 and 1971. The FBI’s stated motivation at the time was “protecting national security, preventing violence, and maintaining the existing social and political order.”

According to FBI records, 85% of COINTELPRO resources were expended on infiltrating, disrupting, marginalizing, and/or subverting groups suspected of being subversive, such as communist and socialist organizations; the women’s rights movement; militant black nationalist groups, and the non-violent civil rights movement, including individuals such as Martin Luther King, Jr. and others associated with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the Congress of Racial Equality, the American Indian Movement, and other civil rights groups; a broad range of organizations labeled “New Left”, including Students for a Democratic Society, the National Lawyers Guild, the Weathermen, almost all groups protesting the Vietnam War, and even individual student demonstrators with no group affiliation; and nationalist groups such as those “seeking independence for Puerto Rico.”

The other 15% of COINTELPRO resources were expended to marginalize and subvert “white hate groups,” including the Ku Klux Klan and National States’ Rights Party. The directives governing COINTELPRO were issued by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, who ordered FBI agents to “expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize” the activities of these movements and their leaders.

This is a documentary on COINTELPRO:

12. The Iran-Contra Affair: In 1985 and ’86, the White House authorized government officials to secretly trade weapons with the Israeli government in exchange for the release of U.S. hostages in Iran. The plot was uncovered by Congress in 1987.

13. The BCCI Scandal: The Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) was a major international bank founded in 1972 by Agha Hasan Abedi, a Pakistani financier. The Bank was registered in Luxembourg. Within a decade BCCI touched its peak, it operated in 78 countries, had over 400 branches, and had assets in excess of US$ 20 billion making it the 7th largest private bank in the world by assets. In the late 1980?s BCCI became the target of a two year undercover operation conducted by the US Customs Service. This operation concluded with a fake wedding that was attended by BCCI officers and drug dealers from around the world who had established a personal friendship and working relationship with undercover Special Agent Robert Mazur.

After a six month trial in Tampa, key bank officers were convicted and received lengthy prison sentences. Bank officers began cooperating with law enforcement authorities and that cooperation caused BCCI’s many crimes to be revealed. BCCI came under the scrutiny of regulatory bodies and intelligence agencies in the 1980s due to its perceived avoidance of falling under one regulatory banking authority, a fact that was later, after extensive investigations, proven to be false. BCCI became the focus of a massive regulatory battle in 1991 and was described as a “$20-billion-plus heist”.

Investigators in the U.S. and the UK revealed that BCCI had been “set up deliberately to avoid centralized regulatory review, and operated extensively in bank secrecy jurisdictions. Its affairs were extraordinarily complex. Its officers were sophisticated international bankers whose apparent objective was to keep their affairs secret, to commit fraud on a massive scale, and to avoid detection.”

14. CIA Drug Running in LA: Pulitzer Prize Award winning journalist Gary Webb exposed this alongside LAPD Narcotics Officer turned whislteblower and author Michael Ruppert, CIA Contract Pilot Terry Reed, and many others. In August 1996 the San Jose Mercury News published Webb’s “Dark Alliance”, a 20,000 word, three-part investigative series which alleged that Nicaraguan drug traffickers had sold and distributed crack cocaine in Los Angeles during the 1980s, and that drug profits were used to fund the CIA-supported Nicaraguan Contras.

Webb never asserted that the CIA directly aided drug dealers to raise money for the Contras, but he did document that the CIA was aware of the cocaine transactions and the large shipments of cocaine into the U.S. by the Contra personnel. “Dark Alliance” received national attention. At the height of the interest, the web version of it on San Jose Mercury News website received 1.3 million hits a day. According to the Columbia Journalism Review, the series became “the most talked-about piece of journalism in 1996 and arguably the most famous—some would say infamous—set of articles of the decade.”

15. Gulf of Tonkin Never Happened: The Gulf of Tonkin Incident is the name given to two separate incidents involving the Democratic Republic of Vietnam and the United States in the waters of the Gulf of Tonkin. On August 2, 1964 two American destroyers engaged three North Vietnamese torpedo boats, resulting in the sinking of one of the torpedo boats. This was also the single most important reason for the escalation of the Vietnam War. After Kennedy was assassinated, the Gulf of Tonkin gave the country the sweeping support for aggressive military action against the North Vietnamese. The outcome of the incident was the passage by Congress of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which granted President Lyndon B. Johnson the authority to assist any Southeast Asian country whose government was considered to be jeopardized by “communist aggression”.

In 2005, an internal National Security Agency historical study was declassified; it concluded that USS Maddox had engaged the North Vietnamese on August 2, but that there may not have been any North Vietnamese vessels present during the engagement of August 4. The report stated “It is not simply that there is a different story as to what happened; it is that no attack happened that night…” In truth, Hanoi’s navy was engaged in nothing that night but the salvage of two of the boats damaged on August 2. In 1965, President Johnson commented privately: “For all I know, our Navy was shooting at whales out there.” In 1981, Captain Herrick and journalist Robert Scheer re-examined Herrick’s ship’s log and determined that the first torpedo report from August 4, which Herrick had maintained had occurred—the “apparent ambush”—was in fact unfounded.

In 1995, retired Vietnamese Defense Minister Vo Nguyen Giap, meeting with former Secretary of Defense McNamara, categorically denied that Vietnamese gunboats had attacked American destroyers on August 4, while admitting to the attack on August 2. In the Fall of 1999, retired senior CIA engineering executive S. Eugene Poteat wrote that he was asked in early August 1964 to determine if the radar operator’s report showed a real torpedo boat attack or an imagined one. In October, 2005 the New York Times reported that Robert J. Hanyok, a historian for the U.S. National Security Agency, had concluded that the NSA deliberately distorted the intelligence reports that it had passed on to policy-makers regarding the August 4, 1964 incident. He concluded that the motive was not political but was probably to cover up honest intelligence errors.

November 9th, 1995 New Clip on Gulf of Tonkin:

16. The Business Plot: In 1933, group of wealthy businessmen that allegedly included the heads of Chase Bank, GM, Goodyear, Standard Oil, the DuPont family and Senator Prescott Bush tried to recruit Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler to lead a military coup against President FDR and install a fascist dictatorship in the United States. And yes, we’re talking about the same Prescott Bush who fathered one US President and grandfathered another one. Smedley Butler was both a patriot and a vocal FDR supporter. Apparently none of these criminal masterminds noticed that their prospective point man had actively stumped for FDR in 1932. Smedley spilled the beans to a congressional committee in 1934.

Everyone he accused of being a conspirator vehemently denied it, and none of them were brought up on criminal charges. Still, the House McCormack-Dickstein Committee did at least acknowledge the existence of the conspiracy, which ended up never getting past the initial planning stages. Though many of the people who had allegedly backed the Business Plot also maintained financial ties with Nazi Germany up through America’s entry into World War II. In 1934, the Business Plot was publicly revealed by retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler testifying to the McCormack-Dickstein Congressional Committee. In his testimony, Butler claimed that a group of men had approached him as part of a plot to overthrow Roosevelt in a military coup.

One of the alleged plotters, Gerald MacGuire, vehemently denied any such plot. In their final report, the Congressional committee supported Butler’s allegations of the existence of the plot, but no prosecutions or further investigations followed, and the matter was mostly forgotten.

On July 17, 1932, thousands of World War I veterans converged on Washington, D.C., set up tent camps, and demanded immediate payment of bonuses due them according to the Adjusted Service Certificate Law of 1924. This “Bonus Army” was led by Walter W. Waters, a former Army sergeant. The Army was encouraged by an appearance from retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler, who had considerable influence over the veterans, being one of the most popular military figures of the time.

A few days after Butler’s arrival, President Herbert Hoover ordered the marchers removed, and their camps were destroyed by US Army cavalry troops under the command of General Douglas MacArthur. Butler, although a self-described Republican, responded by supporting Roosevelt in that year’s election. In a 1995 History Today article Clayton Cramer argued that the devastation of the Great Depression had caused many Americans to question the foundations of liberal democracy. “Many traditionalists, here and in Europe, toyed with the ideas of Fascism and National Socialism; many liberals dallied with Socialism and Communism.” Cramer argues that this explains why some American business leaders viewed fascism as a viable system to both preserve their interests and end the economic woes of the Depression.

BBC – Whitehouse Coup (Part 1)

17. July 20, 1944 Conspiracy to Assassinate Hitler: Among another 20 some odd attempts, this one was one of the largest conspiracies involving hundreds of loyalists in the highest echelons of Hitler’s inner circle. Near the end of WWII, things were rapidly going south for Germany and the time seemed ripe for guilt-ridden Nazi officers to assassinate Hitler and overthrow his government. Colonel Henning von Tresckow recruited Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg to join the conspiracy in 1944. The plot to take out Hitler and then all of his loyal officers was called Operation Valkyrie.

The plan was to use the Continuity of Government Proceedings during an assassination on Hitler’s life to take over full control of the government in Germany. The assassination would be blamed on the Nazi SS and therefore allow Stauffenberg to take full control of all aspects of the government. It almost worked.

In July 1944, Stauffenberg was promoted so that he could now start attending military strategy meetings with Hitler himself. On more than one occasion Stauffenberg planned to kill Hitler at such a meeting with a briefcase bomb, but he always held off because he also wanted to take out Hitler’s two right-hand men, Hermann Goering and Heinrich Himmler. On July 20, he went for it anyway and exploded a bomb inside Hitler’s conference room with a remote detonator. Hitler survived only minor injuries.

18. Operation Ajax: For years, Britain had a spiffy trade deal with Iran regarding their prodigious oil fields. The Anglo-Iranian Oil Company was basically a giant money machine for the Anglo half, while the Iranian half got shafted. That all changed in 1951 when Iran nationalized the AIOC and the Iranian parliament elected Mohammed Mossadegh as Prime Minister. Mossadegh was relatively secular, something that pissed of Iranian clerics, but he was also very nationalistic. He was a democratically elected, pro American figure but the West saw his nationalizing of the oil fields a communist move(something Mossadegh thought was the right of the people to profit and pay for services in the country with).

Those oil fields were under the control of British Petroleum, but unfortunately Mossadegh overruled this long standing business control. The United States sent Kermit Roosevelt, FDR’s nephew and CIA coordinator in to figure out the mess. The best he could come up with was to confront Mossadegh and have him overthrown and this was accomplished by bringing in what the agency refers to as “jackals.” The United States backed the return of the Shah of Iran, one of the most brutal dictators the country had ever seen and intentionally overthrew years before with the democratic leader, Mossadegh.

Until 1979, that is, when a pissed off Iranian populace finally revolted and replaced the monarchy with an anti-West Islamic Republic. The result was a violently anti-American revolution lead by the Ayatollah Khomeini which overthrew the Shah and took hostage US Embassy workers, many of whom were involved in the plot with Kermit Roosevelt that installed the Shah. The planning for the Coup took place largely in that embassy, but Americans were told this was due to the rise of radical Islam and rise of democracy hating Muslims, which of course was far from the truth.

Part 1 of a video done on Operation Ajax history:

Part 2 of the video:

19. Operation Snow White: Some time during the 1970s, the Church of Scientology decided that they’d had enough. Apparently, the Church of Scientology managed to perform the largest infiltration of the United States government in history. Ever. 5,000 of Scientology’s crack commandos wiretapped and burglarized various agencies. They stole hundreds of documents, mainly from the IRS. No critic was spared, and in the end, 136 organizations, agencies and foreign embassies were infiltrated.

20. Operation Gladio: Gladio is a code name denoting the clandestine NATO “stay-behind” operation in Italy after World War II, intended to continue anti-communist resistance in the event of a Warsaw Pact invasion of Western Europe. Although Gladio specifically refers to the Italian branch of the NATO stay-behind organizations, “Operation Gladio” is used as an informal name for all stay-behind organizations, sometimes called “Super NATO”.

The role of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in sponsoring Gladio and the extent of its activities during the Cold War era, and its relationship to right-wing terrorist attacks perpetrated in Italy during the Years of Lead and other similar clandestine operations is the subject of ongoing debate and investigation. Italy, Switzerland and Belgium have had parliamentary inquiries into the matter. What can we prove about that role? Thousands of documents, depositions and testimony as well as recorded conversations and admission by the highest levels of government in Italy. That’s about as credible as it gets, regardless of the CIA’s adamant denial it ever happened.

What took place? The shooting of innocent civilians, terrorism and assassinations all blamed on leftist communists were actually apart of well coordinated, “black operations.” Black operations are typically involving activities that are highly clandestine and, often, outside of standard military protocol.

“The right hand doesn’t know what the left hand is doing.” Black ops missions often fit into the deniable category, a situation in which there is no claim of responsibility for the action, and/or a false flag operation is used to give the appearance that another actor was responsible, or – most often – black operations involve extensive arrangements so as to be able to hide the fact that the black operation ever occurred. Black military operations, or paramilitary operations, can be used by various secret services to achieve or attempt to achieve an unusually sensitive goal.

The methods used in black operations are also used in unconventional warfare. Depending on the precise situation in a given case, and the level of authoritarianism of the national government or other responsible party, some tasks will be conducted as black operations, while there are usually other activities that can be admitted openly. Black operations may include such things as assassination, sabotage, extortion, spying on allied countries or one’s own citizens, kidnapping, supporting resistance movements, torture, use of fraud to obtain funds, use of child soldiers, human experimentation, trafficking in contraband items, etc. Since 9/11, many black operations and long time unethical standings have been approved for legality in the war on terror.

In other words, since September 11th, 2001, it is no a longer conspiracy for any of this to occur, a simple decision by a top level military or CIA official is enough, without oversight or even one thread of admission by the Government or Private conspirators. Much of the Black operations today are performed by private contract companies like Blackwater (now Xe).

This is a documentary banned in teh United States that was allowed to air on BBC. It was an investigation into Operation Gladio:

21. The CIA Assassinates A Lot Of People (Church Committee): The Church Committee is the common term referring to the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, a U.S. Senate committee chaired by Senator Frank Church in 1975. A precursor to the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the committee investigated intelligence gathering for illegality by the CIA and FBI after certain activities had been revealed by the Watergate affair. The Committee uncovered, among many other things, that the CIA had violated its charter to perform only gathering of intelligence. For example, the assassinations of Allende in Chile and Mossadegh in Iran.

Assassinations against Central and South American leaders and revolutionaries, as well as Africa, Middle East and East Asia. The list was tremendous. They even declassified a “Heart Attack Gun” the Agency had made for the use of killing someone without it being detected. Cancer, car accidents, skiing accidents, suicide, boating accidents, heart attacks, and just plain being shot were common assassination methods.

The hearings, although recorded in full in congressional record, the mainstream media and official policies, is still largely not taught in American schools on recent history. The American public still has no idea this was ever actually confirmed or even took place. It is common for people to still refer to any of these assassinations as a joke or made up conspiracy.

Watch the one-minute video below for the description of a former CIA secretary and Congressional testimony on this secret assassination weapon which caused heart attacks.

22. The New World Order: This popular conspiracy theory claims that a small group of international elites controls and manipulates governments, industry and media organisations worldwide. The primary tool they use to dominate nations is the system of central banking. They are said to have funded and in some cases caused most of the major wars of the last 200 years, primarily through carrying out false flag attacks to manipulate populations into supporting them, and have a grip on the world economy, deliberately causing inflation and depressions at will.

The people behind the New World Order are thought to be international bankers, in particular the owners of the private banks in the Federal Reserve System, Bank of England and other central banks, and members of the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and Bilderberg Group. Now, although this conspiracy theory was ridiculed for years, it turns out that the Bilderberg does meet and requests no media coverage. They receive no media coverage. The world’s elite meet every year and it goes largely unreported, for what?

Discussions at the meetings include the economy, world affairs, war and in general, world policy. After the financial collapse, the Bilderberg played a key role in proposing that the world prepare for a new world order and have a standard world currency. This was propsed shortly after by almost all attendees of the Bilderberg meeting.

During the 20th century, many statesmen, such as Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill, used the term “new world order” to refer to a new period of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and the balance of power after World War I and World War II. They all saw these periods as opportunities to implement idealistic or liberal proposals for global governance only in the sense of new collective efforts to identify, understand, or address worldwide problems that go beyond the capacity of individual nation-states to solve.

These proposals led to the creation of international organizations, such as the United Nations and N.A.T.O., and international regimes, such as the Bretton Woods system and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, which were calculated both to maintain a balance of power as well as regularize cooperation between nations, in order to achieve a peaceful phase of capitalism.

In the aftermath of the two World Wars, progressives welcomed these new international organizations and regimes but argued they suffered from a democratic deficit and therefore were inadequate to not only prevent another global war but also foster global justice. American banker David Rockefeller joined the Council on Foreign Relations as its youngest-ever director in 1949 and subsequently became chairman of the board from 1970 to 1985; today he serves as honorary chairman. In 2002, Rockefeller authored his autobiography Memoirs wherein, on page 405, he wrote:

“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents … to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

Thus, activists around the globe formed a world federalist movement bent on creating a “real” new world order. A number of Fabian socialist intellectuals, such as British writer H. G. Wells in the 1940s, appropriated and redefined the term “new world order” as a synonym for the establishment of a full-fledged social democratic world government. In the 1960s, a great deal of right-wing conspiracist attention, by groups like the John Birch Society and the Liberty Lobby, focused on the United Nations as the vehicle for creating the “One World Government”, and contributed to a conservative movement for United States withdrawal from the U.N.

American writer Mary M. Davison, in her 1966 booklet The Profound Revolution, traced the alleged New World Order conspiracy to the creation of the U.S. Federal Reserve System in 1913 by international bankers, who she claimed later formed the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921 as the shadow government. At the time the booklet was published, “international bankers” would have been interpreted by many readers as a reference to a postulated “international Jewish banking conspiracy” masterminded by the Rothschilds and Rockefellers.

American televangelist Pat Robertson with his 1991 best-selling book The New World Order became the most prominent Christian popularizer of conspiracy theories about recent American history as a theater in which Wall Street, the Federal Reserve System, Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group, and Trilateral Commission control the flow of events from behind the scenes, nudging us constantly and covertly in the direction of world government for the Antichrist.

After the turn of the century, specifically during the financial crisis of 2007–2009, many politicians and pundits, such as Gordon Brown, Henry Kissinger, and Barack Obama, used the term “new world order” in their advocacy for a Keynesian reform of the global financial system and their calls for a “New Bretton Woods”, which takes into account emerging markets such as China and India.

These declarations had the unintended consequence of providing fresh fodder for New World Order conspiracism, and culminated in former Clinton administration adviser Dick Morris and conservative talk show host Sean Hannity arguing on one of his Fox News Channel programs that “conspiracy theorists were right”. In 2009, American film directors Luke Meyer and Andrew Neel released New World Order, a critically-acclaimed documentary film which explores the world of conspiracy theorists, such as American radio host Alex Jones, who are committed to exposing and vigorously opposing what they perceive to be an emerging New World Order.

May 24, 1992 Report on New World Order:

23. Kennedy Assassination – the 2nd Investigation by Congress Few People Know About, United States House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA): The HSCA was established in 1976 to investigate the John F. Kennedy assassination and the Martin Luther King, Jr. assassination. The Committee investigated until 1978, and in 1979 issued its final report, concluding that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated by a conspiracy involving the mob, and potentially the CIA. The House Select Committee on Assassinations undertook reinvestigations of the murders of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. In 1979, a single Report and twelve volumes of appendices on each assassination were published by the Congress.

In the JFK case, the HSCA found that there was a “probable conspiracy,” though it was unable to determine the nature of that conspiracy or its other participants (besides Oswald). This finding was based in part on acoustics evidence from a tape purported to record the shots, but was also based on other evidence including an investigation of Ruby’s mafia connections and potential CIA and/or FBI connections to Oswald. To this day, many conspiracy deniers are unaware that the Congressional investigation into JFK’s assassination concluded beyond any shadow of a doubt that it was a conspiracy. What made them come to this conclusion? Aside from reading the report, many witnesses (some of whom were CIA agents and station chiefs in Dallas that morning) were killed the night before testifying.

For example, George de Mohrenschildt was a petroleum geologist who befriended Lee Harvey Oswald during the months preceding the assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy. He also worked for the CIA. He also blew his brains out the night before he was to testify to the committee. The committee also uncovered, among many things, that Oswald left the marines where he learned how to speak fluent Russian (at the height of the cold war). He was given money by the State Department to travel to Russia where he stopped off in Japan at a top secret US Military facility. The Warren Commission even mentioned this part.

What most people do not know is that he probably was working in the Cold War infiltrating the Russians as either a “dangle,” “double agent,” or “defector” of some kind. What is interesting is that upon his return he got more money from the State Department to buy a house and work with an ex FBI Chief and CIA officials in training anti-Castro Cubans for an invasion.

In Louisiana, where he was working, the CIA was involved in Operation Mongoose, Where Oswald worked under CIA Agent David Ferrie, who killed himself before testifying in a trial on the Assassination as well. Operation Mongoose worked closely with Southern Mafia figures largely because the casinos in Cuba, which were shut down after Fidel obtained control over the country, were epicenters for control on the island. The CIA even hired the mafia to assassinate Fidel on many occasions, 3 attempts which failed are common knowledge. What is funny is that figures who worked very close with Oswald either ended up dead (over 100 of them connected to the assassination died within a few years of unusual circumstances) or they ended up in other conspiracies.

For instance, E Howard Hunt (CIA Agent) confessed to being involved in the conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy on his deathbed. E Howard Hunt was one of the Watergate Burglars. Barry Seal, who worked with Oswald and Ferrie ended up being one of the largest cocaine smugglers in the United States during Iran Contra, as a key player for the agency and informant for the DEA. There is so much more to get into, but there just isn’t enough time. Oswald’s tax returns are still classified top secret to this day. Why? Perhaps he was still getting $$ from the United States, which places him on the payroll. That money trail leads to figures, many of whom were murdered, that would have blown the story wide open. For 14 years, most didn’t know this. The HSCA investigaitons by congress went against the findings of the Warren Commission and both reports are from the same source, Congressional Committees. Which is true? Why do we only teach one to our children in school?

December 30, 1978 Report on HSCA Findings:

24. 1919 World Series Conspiracy: The 1919 World Series (often referred to as the Black Sox Scandal) resulted in the most famous scandal in baseball history. Eight players from the Chicago White Sox (nicknamed the Black Sox) were accused of throwing the series against the Cincinnati Reds. Details of the scandal remain controversial, and the extent to which each player was involved varied. It was, however, front-page news across the country when the story was uncovered late in the 1920 season, and despite being acquitted of criminal charges (throwing baseball games was technically not a crime), the eight players were banned from organized baseball (i.e. the leagues subject to the National Agreement) for life. There are hundreds of other conspiracies involving throwing games, sporting matches and large scale entertainment events. It is common knowledge for many, this list would have to go into the thousands if we included all of them.

25. Karen Silkwood: Karen was an American labor union activist and chemical technician at the Kerr-McGee plant near Crescent, Oklahoma, United States. Silkwood’s job was making plutonium pellets for nuclear reactor fuel rods. After being hired at Kerr-McGee, Silkwood joined the Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Union local and took part in a strike at the plant. After the strike ended, she was elected to the union’s bargaining committee and assigned to investigate health and safety issues. She discovered what she believed to be numerous violations of health regulations, including exposure of workers to contamination, faulty respiratory equipment and improper storage of samples. She also believed the lack of sufficient shower facilities could increase the risk of employee contamination.

In the summer of 1974, Silkwood testified to the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) about these issues, alleging that safety standards had slipped because of a production speedup which resulted in employees being given tasks for which they were poorly trained. She also alleged that Kerr-McGee employees handled the fuel rods improperly and that the company falsified inspection records. On November 5, 1974, Silkwood performed a routine self-check and found almost 400 times the legal limit for plutonium contamination. She was decontaminated at the plant and sent home with a testing kit to collect urine and feces for further analysis. Oddly, though there was plutonium on the exterior surfaces (the ones she touched) of the gloves she had been using, the gloves did not have any holes.

This suggests the contamination did not come from inside the glove box, but from some other source, in other words, someone was trying to poison her. The next morning, as she headed to a union negotiation meeting, she again tested positive for plutonium. This was surprising because she had only performed paperwork duties that morning. She was given a more intense decontamination. The following day, November 7, 1974, as she entered the plant, she was found to be dangerously contaminated — even expelling contaminated air from her lungs.

A health physics team accompanied her back to her home and found plutonium traces on several surfaces — especially in the bathroom and the refrigerator. The house was later stripped and decontaminated. Silkwood, her partner and housemate were sent to Los Alamos National Laboratory for in-depth testing to determine the extent of the contamination in their bodies. Later that evening, Silkwood’s body was found in her car, which had run off the road and struck a culvert. The car contained no documents. She was pronounced dead at the scene from a “classic, one-car sleeping-driver accident”.

26. CIA Drug Smuggling in Arkansas: August 23, 1987, in a rural community just south of Little Rock, police officers murdered two teenage boys because they witnessed a police-protected drug drop. The drop was part of a drug smuggling operation based at a small airport in Mena, Arkansas. The Mena operation was set up in the early 1980?s by the notorious drug smuggler, Barry Seal. Facing prison after a drug conviction in Florida, Seal flew to Washington, D.C., where he put together a deal that allowed him to avoid prison by becoming an informant for the government.

As a government informant against drug smugglers, Seal testified he worked for the CIA and the DEA. In one federal court case, he testified that his income from March 1984 to August 1985, was between $700,000 and $800,000. This period was AFTER making his deal with the government. Seal testified that nearly $600,000 of this came from smuggling drugs while working for — and with the permission of the DEA. In addition to his duties as an informant, Seal was used by CIA operatives to help finance the Nicaraguan Contras.

The CIA connection to the Mena operation was undeniable when a cargo plane given to Seal by the CIA was shot down over Nicaragua with a load of weapons. In spite of the evidence, every investigator who has tried to expose the crimes of Mena has been professionally destroyed, and those involved in drug smuggling operations have received continued protection from state and federal authorities.

27. Bohemian Grove: For years, many conspiracy theorists were saying that the rich and powerful met every year in the woods and worshiped a giant stone owl in an occult fashion. It turns out, ABC, CBS, NBC, and many other credible news agencies investigated this and found out, its true. It is said to be just all fun and games, like brotherhood style fraternity stuff. These news clips can be viewed by clicking here.

For more clips on the Bohemian Grove including comprehensive investigations by the mainstream media, clik here…

28. Operation Paperclip: Operation Paperclip was the code name for the 1945 Office of Strategic Services, Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency recruitment of German scientists from Nazi Germany to the U.S. after VE Day. President Truman authorized Operation Paperclip in August 1945; however he expressly ordered that anyone found “to have been a member of the Nazi party and more than a nominal participant in its activities, or an active supporter of Nazi militarism” would be excluded.

These included Wernher von Braun, Arthur Rudolph and Hubertus Strughold, who were all officially on record as Nazis and listed as a “menace to the security of the Allied Forces.” All were cleared to work in the U.S. after having their backgrounds “bleached” by the military; false employment histories were provided, and their previous Nazi affiliations were expunged from the record. The paperclips that secured newly-minted background details to their personnel files gave the operation its name.

29. The Round Table: British businessman Cecil Rhodes advocated the British Empire reannexing the United States of America and reforming itself into an “Imperial Federation” to bring about a hyperpower and lasting world peace. In his first will, of 1877, written at the age of 23, he expressed his wish to fund a secret society (known as the Society of the Elect) that would advance this goal:

“To and for the establishment, promotion and development of a Secret Society, the true aim and object whereof shall be for the extension of British rule throughout the world, the perfecting of a system of emigration from the United Kingdom, and of colonization by British subjects of all lands where the means of livelihood are attainable by energy, labor and enterprise, and especially the occupation by British settlers of the entire Continent of Africa, the Holy Land, the Valley of the Euphrates, the Islands of Cyprus and Candia, the whole of South America, the Islands of the Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britain, the whole of the Malay Archipelago, the seaboard of China and Japan, the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire, the inauguration of a system of Colonial representation in the Imperial Parliament which may tend to weld together the disjointed members of the Empire and, finally, the foundation of so great a Power as to render wars impossible, and promote the best interests of humanity.”

In his later wills, a more mature Rhodes abandoned the idea and instead concentrated on what became the Rhodes Scholarship, which had British statesman Alfred Milner as one of its trustees. Established in 1902, the original goal of the trust fund was to foster peace among the great powers by creating a sense of fraternity and a shared world view among future British, American, and German leaders by having enabled them to study for free at the University of Oxford.

Milner and British official Lionel George Curtis were the architects of the Round Table movement, a network of organizations promoting closer union between Britain and its self-governing colonies. To this end, Curtis founded the Royal Institute of International Affairs in June 1919 and, with his 1938 book The Commonwealth of God, began advocating for the creation of an imperial federation that eventually reannexes the U.S., which would be presented to Protestant churches as being the work of the Christian God to elicit their support.

The Commonwealth of Nations was created in 1949 but it would only be a free association of independent states rather than the powerful imperial federation imagined by Rhodes, Milner and Curtis. The Council on Foreign Relations began in 1917 with a group of New York academics who were asked by President Woodrow Wilson to offer options for the foreign policy of the United States in the interwar period.

Originally envisioned as a British-American group of scholars and diplomats, some of whom belonging to the Round Table movement, it was a subsequent group of 108 New York financiers, manufacturers and international lawyers organized in June 1918 by Nobel Peace Prize recipient and U.S. secretary of state, Elihu Root, that became the Council on Foreign Relations on 29 July 1921.

The first of the council’s projects was a quarterly journal launched in September 1922, called Foreign Affairs. Some believe that the Council on Foreign Relations is a front organization for the Round Table as a tool of the “Anglo-American Establishment”, which they believe has been plotting from 1900 on to rule the world. The research findings of historian Carroll Quigley, author of the 1966 book Tragedy and Hope, are taken by both conspiracy theorists of the American Old Right (Cleon Skousen) and New Left (Carl Oglesby) to substantiate this view, even though he argued that the Establishment is not involved in a plot to implement a one-world government but rather British and American benevolent imperialism driven by the mutual interests of economic elites in the United Kingdom and the United States.

Quigley also argued that, although the Round Table still exists today, its position in influencing the policies of world leaders has been much reduced from its heyday during World War I and slowly waned after the end of World War II and the Suez Crisis. Today it is largely a ginger group, designed to consider and gradually influence the policies of the Commonwealth of Nations, but faces strong opposition. Furthermore, in American society after 1965, the problem, according to Quigley, was that no elite was in charge and acting responsibly.

American banker David Rockefeller joined the Council on Foreign Relations as its youngest-ever director in 1949 and subsequently became chairman of the board from 1970 to 1985; today he serves as honorary chairman. In 2002, Rockefeller authored his autobiography Memoirs wherein, on page 405, he wrote:

“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents … to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

Barkun argues that this statement is partly facetious (the claim of “conspiracy” or “treason”) and partly serious – the desire to encourage trilateral cooperation among the U.S., Europe, and Japan, for example – an ideal that used to be a hallmark of the internationalist wing of the Republican Party when there was an internationalist wing. However, the statement is taken at face value and widely cited by conspiracy theorists as proof that the Council on Foreign Relations (itself alleged to be a front for an “international banking cabal”, as well as, it is claimed, the sponsor of many “globalist” think tanks such as the Trilateral Commission) uses its role as the brain trust of American presidents, senators and representatives to manipulate them into supporting a New World Order.

Conspiracy theorists fear that the international bankers of financial capitalism are planning to eventually subvert the independence of the U.S. by subordinating national sovereignty to a strengthened Bank for International Settlements with the intent to “create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole”. In a 13 November 2007 interview with Canadian journalist Benjamin Fulford, Rockefeller countered:

“I don’t think that I really feel that we need a world government. We need governments of the world that work together and collaborate. But, I can’t imagine that there would be any likelihood or even that it would be desirable to have a single government elected by the people of the world … There have been people, ever since I’ve had any kind of position in the world, who have accused me of being ruler of the world. I have to say that I think for the large part, I would have to decide to describe them as crackpots. It makes no sense whatsoever, and isn’t true, and won’t be true, and to raise it as a serious issue seems to me to be irresponsible.”

Some American social critics, such as Laurence H. Shoup, argue that the Council on Foreign Relations is an “imperial brain trust”, which has, for decades, played a central behind-the-scenes role in shaping U.S. foreign policy choices for the post-WWII international order and the Cold War, by determining what options show up on the agenda and what options do not even make it to the table; while others, such as G. William Domhoff, argue that it is in fact a mere policy discussion forum, which provides the business input to U.S. foreign policy planning.

The latter argue that it has nearly 3,000 members, far too many for secret plans to be kept within the group; all the council does is sponsor discussion groups, debates and speakers; and as far as being secretive, it issues annual reports and allows access to its historical archives.

30. The Illuminati: The Order of the Illuminati was an Enlightenment-age secret society founded on May 1st, 1776, in Ingolstadt (Upper Bavaria), by Adam Weishaupt, who was the first lay professor of canon law at the University of Ingolstadt. The movement consisted of freethinkers, secularists, liberals, republicans and pro-feminists, recruited in the Masonic Lodges of Germany, who sought to promote perfectionism through mystery schools. As a result, in 1785, the order was infiltrated, broken and suppressed by the government agents of Charles Theodore, Elector of Bavaria, in his campaign to neutralize the threat of secret societies ever becoming hotbeds of conspiracies to overthrow the monarchy and state religion.

In the late 18th century, reactionary conspiracy theorists, such as Scottish physicist John Robison and French Jesuit priest Augustin Barruel, began speculating that the Illuminati survived their suppression and became the masterminds behind the French Revolution and the Reign of Terror. The Illuminati were accused of being enlightened absolutists who were attempting to secretly orchestrate a world revolution in order to globalize the most radical ideals of the Enlightenment: anti-clericalism, anti-monarchism, and anti-patriarchalism.

During the 19th century, fear of an Illuminati conspiracy was a real concern of European ruling classes, and their oppressive reactions to this unfounded fear provoked in 1848 the very revolutions they sought to prevent. Although many say that the Illuminati was disbanded and destroyed so long ago, it is well known that the Rothschild dynasty following the family’s involvement in the secret order in Bavaria received much attention for its major takeover of Europe’s central banks. The Rothschild dynasty owns roughly half of the world’s wealth and evidence suggests it has funded both sides of major wars, including the United States Civil War.

31. The Trilateral Commission: The Trilateral Commission is a private organization, established to foster closer cooperation among the United States, Europe and Japan. It was founded in July 1973 at the initiative of David Rockefeller, who was Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations at that time. The Trilateral Commission is widely seen as a counterpart to the Council on Foreign Relations. In July 1972, Rockefeller called his first meeting, which was held at Rockefeller’s Pocantico compound in New York’s Hudson Valley.

It was attended by about 250 individuals who were carefully selected and screened by Rockefeller and represented the very elite of finance and industry. Its first executive committee meeting was held in Tokyo in October 1973. The Trilateral Commission was officially initiated, holding biannual meetings. A Trilateral Commission Task Force Report, presented at the 1975 meeting in Kyoto, Japan, called An Outline for Remaking World Trade and Finance, said: “Close Trilateral cooperation in keeping the peace, in managing the world economy, and in fostering economic development and in alleviating world poverty, will improve the chances of a smooth and peaceful evolution of the global system.”

Another Commission document read: “The overriding goal is to make the world safe for interdependence by protecting the benefits which it provides for each country against external and internal threats which will constantly emerge from those willing to pay a price for more national autonomy. This may sometimes require slowing the pace at which interdependence proceeds, and checking some aspects of it. More frequently however, it will call for checking the intrusion of national government into the international exchange of both economic and non-economic goods.”

32. Big Brother or the Shadow Government: It is also called the “Deep State” by Peter Dale Scott, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley. A shadow government is a “government-in-waiting” that remains in waiting with the intention of taking control of a government in response to some event. It turned out this was true on 9/11, when it was told to us by our mainstream media. For years, this was ridiculed as a silly, crazy conspiracy theory and, like the others listed here, turned out to be 100% true. It is also called the Continuity of Government.

The Continuity of Government (COG) is the principle of establishing defined procedures that allow a government to continue its essential operations in case of nuclear war or other catastrophic event. Since the end of the cold war, the policies and procedures for the COG have been altered according to realistic threats of that time. These include but are not limited to a possible coup or overthrow by right wing terrorist groups, a terrorist attack in general, an assassination, and so on. Believe it or not the COG has been in effect since 2001. After 9/11, it went into action. Now here is the kicker, many of the figures in Iran Contra, the Watergate Scandal, the alleged conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy, and many others listed here are indeed members of the COG. This is its own conspiracy as well.

The Secret Team: The CIA and Its Allies in Control of the United States and the World is a book written by Air Force Col. L fletcher Prouty, published in 1973. From 1955 to 1963 Prouty was the “Focal Point Officer” for contacts between the CIA and the Pentagon on matters relating to military support for “black operations” but he was not assigned to the CIA and was not bound by any oath of secrecy. (From the first page of the 1974 Printing) It was one of the first tell-all books about the inner workings of the CIA and was an important influence on the Oliver Stone movie JFK. But the main thrust of the book is how the CIA started as a think tank to analyze intelligence gathered from military sources but has grown to the monster it has become.

The CIA had no authority to run their own agents or to carry out covert operations but they quickly did both and much more. This book tells about things they actually did and a lot about how the operate. In Prouty’s own words, from the 1997 edition of The Secret Team: This is the fundamental game of the Secret Team. They have this power because they control secrecy and secret intelligence and because they have the ability to take advantage of the most modern communications system in the world, of global transportation systems, of quantities of weapons of all kinds, and when needed, the full support of a world-wide U.S. military supporting base structure.

They can use the finest intelligence system in the world, and most importantly, they have been able to operate under the canopy of an assumed, ever-present enemy called “Communism.” It will be interesting to see what “enemy” develops in the years ahead. It appears that “UFO’s and Aliens” are being primed to fulfill that role for the future. To top all of this, there is the fact that the CIA, itself, has assumed the right to generate and direct secret operations. “ He is not the first to allege that UFOs and Aliens are going to be used as a threat against the world to globalize the planet under One government.

The Report From Iron Mountain is a book, published in 1967 (during the Johnson Administration) by Dial Press, that states that it is the report of a government panel. According to the report, a 15-member panel, called the Special Study Group, was set up in 1963 to examine what problems would occur if the U.S. entered a state of lasting peace. They met at an underground nuclear bunker called Iron Mountain (as well as other, worldwide locations) and worked over the next two years.

Iron Mountain is where the government has stored the flight 93 evidence from 9/11. A member of the panel, one “John Doe”, a professor at a college in the Midwest, decided to release the report to the public. The heavily footnoted report concluded that peace was not in the interest of a stable society, that even if lasting peace “could be achieved, it would almost certainly not be in the best interests of society to achieve it.” War was a part of the economy.

Therefore, it was necessary to conceive a state of war for a stable economy. The government, the group theorized, would not exist without war, and nation states existed in order to wage war. War also served a vital function of diverting collective aggression. They recommended that bodies be created to emulate the economic functions of war. They also recommended “blood games” and that the government create alternative foes that would scare the people with reports of alien life-forms and out of control pollution.

Another proposal was the reinstitution of slavery. U.S. News and World Report claimed in its November 20, 1967 issue to have confirmation of the reality of the report from an unnamed government official, who added that when President Johnson read the report, he ‘hit the roof’ and ordered it to be suppressed for all time. Additionally, sources were said to have revealed that orders were sent to U.S. embassies, instructing them to emphasize that the book had no relation to U.S. Government policy. Project Blue Beam is also a common conspiracy theory that alleges that a faked alien landing would be used as a means of scaring the public into whatever global system is suggested. Some researchers suggest the Report from Iron Mountain might be fabricated, others swear it is real.

Bill Moyers, the American journalist and public commentator, has served as White House Press Secretary in the United States President Lyndon B. Johnson Administration from 1965 to 1967. He worked as a news commentator on television for ten years. Moyers has had an extensive involvement with public television, producing documentaries and news journal programs. He has won numerous awards and honorary degrees. He has become well known as a trenchant critic of the U.S. media. Since 1990, Moyers has been President of the Schumann Center for Media and Democracy. He is considered by many to be a very credible outlet for the truth.

He released a documetnary titled, The Secret Government, which exposed the inner workings of a secret government much more vast that most people would ever imagine. Though originally broadcast in 1987, it is even more relevant today. Interviews with respected top military, intelligence, and government insiders reveal both the history and secret objectives of powerful groups in the hidden shadows of our government.

Here is that documentary:

For another powerful, highly revealing documentary on the manipulations of the secret government produced by BBC, click here (view free at link provided). The intrepid BBC team clearly shows how the War on Terror is largely a fabrication. For those interested in very detailed information on the composition of the shadow or secret government from a less well-known source, take a look at the summary available here.

33. The Federal Reserve Bank: The fundamental promise of a central bank like the Federal Reserve is economic stability. The theory is that manipulating the value of the currency allows financial booms to go higher, and crashes to be more mild. If growth becomes speculative and unsustainable, the central bank can make the price of money go up and force some deleveraging of risky investments – again, promising to make the crashes more mild.

The period leading up to the American revolution was characterized by increasingly authoritarian legislation from England. Acts passed in 1764 had a particularly harsh effect on the previously robust colonial economy. The Sugar Act was in effect a tax cut on easily smuggled molasses, and a new tax on commodities that England more directly controlled trade over. The navy would be used in increased capacity to enforce trade laws and collect duties. Perhaps even more significant than the militarization and expansion of taxes was the Currency Act passed later in the year 1764.

“The colonies suffered a constant shortage of currency with which to conduct trade. There were no gold or silver mines and currency could only be obtained through trade as regulated by Great Britain. Many of the colonies felt no alternative to printing their own paper money in the form of Bills of Credit.” The result was a true free market of currency – each bank competed, exchange rates fluctuated wildly, and merchants were hesitant to accept these notes as payment. Of course, they didn’t have 24-hour digital Forex mar

Radio This Weekend – Shakespeare and Expanding Earth

Join me on TheIntelHubNewsNetwork Saturdays and Sundays at SEVEN PM EST for The Investigation. This weekend:

Saturday 7PM EST – “Expanding Earth?” We talk with Tokyo-based journalist, long-time writer for the Japan Times, 20 year ex-patriot in Japan, former US Navy air-traffic controller, 9/11 activist, and all-around nice guy Jeff Ogrisseg, for a report on the fiction of “plate tectonics and the remarkable changes that planet Earth has undergone in its life-cycle. (Read Jeff’s Japan Times article on “Our Growing Earth.”)

Sunday 7PM EST – “Nothing is Truer Than Truth!” We talk with film-maker Cheryl Eagan-Donovan about her upcoming documentary exploring the hidden reality of Shakespeare’s true identity – that of the 17th Earl of Oxford, Edward de Vere. Eagan-Donovan’s new film is based on the wonderful book, “Shakespeare by Another Name” by Mark Anderson (who I’ve interviewed Here).

Download the episode (Right click and ‘save’)

Says Donovan: “The film is about Edward de Vere, Seventeenth Earl of Oxford, A-list party boy on the continental circuit, who spent a year and a half in Venice and traveling in Europe, learning about commedia dell’arte and collecting experiences that would become the plays…

Material filmed to date includes interviews with many renowned Shakespeare scholars and actors including Sir Derek Jacobi and Mark Rylance, and a tour of Castle Hedingham, the ancestral home of the de Veres family since the days of William the Conqueror…

The film focuses on the eighteen month period when de Vere escaped the confines of life at Elizabeth’s Court, and traveled the continent from his home base in Venice. NOTHING IS TRUER THAN TRUTH will introduce today’s students, tomorrow’s writers, to Edward de Vere, a man whose life story is the greatest story ever written.

The Shakespeare myth is about to undergo a huge paradigm shift, and what it means to be the greatest writer in the English language will never be the same.

Visit the film’s website at: www.controversyfilms.com

Nothing is Truer Than Truth (Trailer) from Cheryl Eagan-Donovan on Vimeo.

Radio This Weekend

Saturday at 6 PM EST: Liam talks about death and more death, trauma and more trauma, tragedy and more tragedy, as he goes over recent events in his life, and reveals the thoughts and reflections brought about by the sudden horrifying and tragic loss of a dear and irreplaceable loved one….

Keywords – Death, afterlife, spirituality, hospitals, omens, Western medicine, angry Gods, Hinduism, Christianity, the Tibetan book of death and dying

Sunday at 6PM EST: Liam talks about the manufacture of information in the scientific-medical-media complex, highlighting bird, swine, snail and all the other flu pandemics promised but never arrived. Read “Polio – A Shot in the Dark” by Janine Roberts.

Our scheduled guest, David Drew, was not able to join us do to technical problems, but will be back with us in an upcoming show.

Watch the video: Cometary Tales of the Unexpected

Keywords: Swine flu, bird flu, South East Asia, Tamiflu, Polio, Jim Purdy,  Janine Roberts, Polio, Vaccines, Salk, Sabin, PBS

And visit The Intel Hub News Network for more cutting edge webradio programming.

PBS – The Public Brainwashing Service – a Public Challenge

Proposition: Public Television is the propaganda arm of government (that’s taxpayer-funded) science. PBS gets its information and marching orders from the riders of the academic gravy train…and what is that?

It’s the academic elephant walk that fills university labs with bespeckled, dutiful grad students, suffering insult, overwork and injury from the deadbeats who runs the lab and the program at their expensive university.

Each of the grad-lackies shucks and jives, and jumps-as-high as required to get their wildly constrained research assignments in on time — overtime, underpaid, and over-worked as they are. They allow their limited results to be stolen for years, by their ‘betters’ – their academic mentors and superiors in the lab and in the department – so that they can get a share of the tiny bit of glory:

A mention in a paper. A name below the title with five, ten, fifteen other names. Is it ‘science’ they’re after? Or just a little ego recognition?

And what dictates the course of their research?

Answer: Same old bastards who ran university programs and “mastered the heights” while blue-collar fathers were working hard to put their bright progeny through college. It’s still the same old 17th Century bishop’s school. The same old church, with a little more emphasis on chemistry versus alchemy — but both do just fine to obfuscate their wildly empty theoretical gesticulations:

  • Does getting bitten in the groin by parrots cause weight loss? Let’s do a study.
  • Is doing drugs for 10 years in a row ‘immuno-suppressive?’ Let’s hire some deadbeat college drop outs, and publish!
  • How about feeding AIDS patients a great variety of nutrients, and giving them natural products to kill any candida they have?

“Now, we can’t do that! Because HIV is the sole cause of AIDS, and the only cure, or treatment, is strong Black-Box ’till death do ye part,’ drugs. Silly munchkin. You’ll learn!”

  • Well, surely we can see if there are any invisible things in space that we cannot see or measure, which also must have infinite energy (in order to explain the ‘big bang doesn’t work at all Paradox’)?

Yes! Yes we can. Let’s dip into the ol’ tax-payers wallet, and do that research…

And who knows? Someday, PBS may feature YOU, YOU, yes YOU, young pup, in a ‘documentary’ on…oh…”Dark Matter!” Or, “constantly mutating retroviruses that prove how accidental, blind evolution really must be true!”

We’ve got a million of them. And that’s where PBS gets its information. That’s what NOVA is. A collection of rubble, spewed out of the rear end of fading careers, locked into cracked and broken paradigms, held aloft by the vanity, mortgage and car payments of the permanent residents of the Ivory Tower.

And if you buy what you pay for (because you are paying for it, tax-dollars) on PBS science television, then you’re ending up with the greasy end of the pole.

Don’t agree? Then try me. List your favorite “best science” PBS program below – from the NOVA series, or Frontline, one of their big-budget one-offs, like this eugenics project…

And I’ll come back with a brief analysis.

If you agree that PBS managed to miss at least one very important exception to what they will most certainly claim to be ‘the best current theory,’ then you can buy me…oh… I don’t know. A puppy.

Or, something at Amazon.com. A book, a bauble, or something fun, like a pornographic magazine made of gold.

Or, you can just say, “okay, you got me.” And we’ll be square.

Awaiting ye science noids with your love of jargon. I thank you for your relative politeness up front, and will return what I receive in kind.

Cheerios,

Liam Scheff

Rules: Be polite. Post your show’s URL, and make your claim. IE – “This fairly and accurately represents the best research being done in [Fill in the blank] studies. No great exceptions were missed, and it presented its critics views fairly.”

If I cannot find one glaring omission that falsifies or severely damages the program’s major premise, I will acknowledge this and give the episode a gold star and a special write-up in a separate blog.


How the Earth Works: Plate Tectonics – A Beginner’s Guide For Experts

by Liam Scheff
July 2010

“From Soup to Nuts, Science Has it Covered” – Me.

“`Cheshire Puss,’ she began, rather timidly,as she did not at all know whether it would like the name:
however, it only grinned a little wider….Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?’
– Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland

“Earth is the only planet where subduction is known to occur. Without subduction, plate tectonics could not exist.” – Wikipedia – “Subduction”

Continue reading How the Earth Works: Plate Tectonics – A Beginner’s Guide For Experts

Japan Times Breaks Earth, Terrifies Science Elite

Extra! Extra! “Mainstream Newspaper Reports on Failures of Geo-physics; Skeptic Magazine, and Scientific Elite Get Big, Big Wedgie and Have Fit, and Scream and Call People Names, As Science Demands.”


How in the World…

Late last year, the Japan Times allowed its readers inside of one of the gigantic-ist fist-de-cuffs in the sciences as they pondered the question – Where did Milwaukee come from?

But not just Milwaukee – all of North America – and South America too! And even…Sri Lanka!

And that is the question: How did the Continents that we live on get to where they are today? Were they always as they are now? Have they moved? And if so, how did they do it? And why?

The Japan Times gives voice to a difference of opinion in the sciences, each representing ancient philosophical points of view.

The Ancient Argument

Two ideas have provided answers to the human imagination since time immemorial:

1. Things have pretty much always been this way. Nothing changes very much at all, and nothing changes quickly. God and/or Nature does not make leaps (or do anything to upset priests and scientists). Call it “Uniformitarianism.”

2. “Panta Rei” – Everything is Flux, (and that is the way of things, and the creative process, and even the Creator, however you name it).

The first idea has been the most popular with governments and churches and financial institutions, because their job is generally to take your money, and tell you that it’s good for you that they do so. And in order to do this, they have to tell you that everything is going to be alright, and it’s all under control.

The second idea is where reality makes its home. Everything changes. And that idea is…unsettling. And it does not speak easily of well-established anythings, but of a world and a universe which is inventive, expansive, and thinking, changing, creating….and destroying.

So, there have been two ideas of Earth’s formation:

1. It was always like this, just as it was made.

2. It has changed.

The Absolutely Truthful and Factual Scientific Mainstream Theory

The current “true and scientific” textbook-approved idea tells us calmly and assuredly that the Earth has always been the same size. The Earth does not grow, nor does it shrink. (This is very important to remember, because it is a “fact”).

But…the continents DO move.

That is, Africa/Europe and North-South America were once neighbors. More than neighbors…Oh, let’s just tell it like it is – They were living happily together, nous deux…And then….they grew apart.

– Reasons for the break-up: “I understand they just wanted to see other people.” “They seemed so happy together!” “It’s such a shame. I heard she was tired of his colonial oppression.” “Can you blame her? Did you ever hear the way he talked! Worse than Mel Gibson!” (please feel free to insert your Africa-America break-up joke here. Prizes will be given at the door, as you head to the parking lot. Remember to tip your waitress, and watch for bears, we’ve had some problems).

So, they “drifted apart.” Yes, tens of thousands of miles of deep thick massive continent set sail for parts unknown, over and over again. Seem strange? Well, it is a “fact,” so you are allowed to think it…and must believe that it’s true…But it wasn’t always so.

In truth, this very theory was once violently rejected by the scientific elite: “Impossible!” They screamed! “We can discover no mechanism that would make this so! Continents do not MOVE!!”

And as all good scientists do, they buried the notion for fifty years and called it “debunked, discredited and disgraced!”

And then they accepted it. But only after the originator of the hypothesis (poor Alfred Wegener) had died a lonely death on expedition in farthest Greenland, taking measurements, doing actual observational field work (if you can believe such a thing), trying to find evidence for his theory. And fifty years was about enough time for everyone to forget that it was the same elite that now claimed his work, who had decades earlier buried his research, before he was in actuality, deceased.

What made them change their minds?

War! What is it good for? Making new stuff, that’s what.

Undersea radar developed to hunt submarines during WWII gave oceanographers images of the deep sea floor. And they discovered that oceans, all over the world, are divided and demarcated by thousands and thousands of miles of volcanic ridges – fissures in the planet where the Earth upwells hot material and builds underwater mountains. Which they think look about like this:

“Golly, it sure looks like you could slide these continents right smack back together…don’t it?”

They’ve since dated the rocks in the picture, using magnetic changes as clocks, and colored them to show what’s new and what’s old. They now believe that the growth at ridges not only goes up, but also out – and pushes the oceans further apart. And so they’ve decided that the Earth is, in fact growing. (And now they get to ignore researchers who say that the ocean floor dating is not accurate – but that’s science!)

And so, “facts change.”

But, remember, the Earth cannot grow, because this is a scientific fact. And so, while they embraced ocean growth whole-heartedly, they also re-wrote the theory.

Because if the Earth were believed to be growing….well…It can’t be. Because that would just ruin EVERYTHING! Not only in the earth sciences, but in physics, chemistry – even in religion. If the Earth grows – if planets grow – then…gosh….Everything we think, or have thought about our place in the universe has to be re-examined. The universe grows, is creative, expansive…alive…??

No small thing. And not something anybody in the taxpayer-funded, ego-driven, reductionist sciences really wants to encourage. And so, the Earth does not grow. (And that’s a “fact” that must be defended).

The Hungry, Hungry Earth

The scientific elite embraced the idea of “expanding oceans,” and invented a model which would make sure that the Earth stayed the same size – in theory. They called it “subduction,” and it goes like this:

The continents would sit on the ocean’s floor (which is made of miles-thick dense, hard basalt), and this basalt would be EATEN – chewed up, sucked down into the bowels of the Earth – at precisely the same rate as it is created along those 70,000 KM of ocean ridges. Yep, it would be crunched under, masticated, and dropped into the depths of the planet –  the mantle .  (Where no one can ever check up on it, to see what is really happening. Very flexible data is ‘interpreted’ to fit the current model – and when it doesn’t fit with the model? Well, you’ll see).

– Super-flexy conveyor belt of scientific truth and factuality! (Actual planet may not resemble model. See your local agent for details).

In fact, these “subduction zones” have to be three times more destructive than the Earth is creative. That is, they must eat the planet’s 10 to 40 mile thick plates of ocean-wide rock three times faster than the ocean ridges can make them – because there are three times more ocean ridges than there are subduction zones. Go figure! That’s some craaazy planet!


“Munch Munch Munch!! Feed me ROCK!” – Mainstream Factual Earth Science Theory.

So crazy, in fact, that the blighted Wikipedia – where the scientific elite posts their edicts – has to say the following:

“Earth is the only planet where subduction is known to occur. Without subduction, plate tectonics could not exist.” [Wikipedia: “Subduction”]

Hey, that sounds reasonable, doesn’t it? (Does it matter that other planets do seem to grow?) Nope! Because Earth is special. Just like the Pope told Galileo. Special! And that’s science – true, factual, honest, and never arrogant. Never!

The Changing Truth

But, oh, sadness, sadness! Malheureusement, things have never gone well for this model, and most of these zones don’t really ‘subduct’ anymore.

What happened? Well, the model has changed, you see, because the model wasn’t working out. It wasn’t making accurate predictions, so they had to…change it. They couldn’t get RID of it! Don’t be absurd! Because the Earth cannot change size! Which is the most important thing, after all.

So here’s how it goes now: They’ve added something called “Flat Subduction,” which means that the big plates of Earth’s crust aren’t really “eaten” anymore, they just sort of ‘slide under’ the continents.

This is from a web posting by a Ph.D. candidate who is having to adjust her thesis model using the ‘flat subduction’ approach. It leads to…spectacularly speculative inferences:

“A resurgence in this magmatism resulted from more changes in the subduction geometry; in one model, the down going Farallon plate began to steepen again at ~40 Ma, allowing for more decompression melting and magmatism under the western United States; and in another model, only part of the plate steepens (like ripping a part of a sheet of paper in half, keeping one half horizontal and pulling the other down).

This model suggested that the “rip” or warp in the plate propagated south as the plate subducted, which accounts for the patterns of volcanic deposits produced during this interval (moving south and west-to-east at the same time). The second idea also explains the lack of volcanism south of the igneous “front” by having the steeply-dipping portion of the down going plate on the north side of the front, and the gently-dipping plate to the south.”

– Flexi-Tearable Split Paper Rubber Rox – It’s Science!

Ever see stone do that? (Me neither). But, it’s a “factual” theory, not “pseudo-science.” Can you tell the difference?

I’m going to take a walk later, and see if I can rip the road gently into two long strips, because I’d like one side of the road to go more steeply downhill, as it would make for a more exciting jaunt. It’s a scientifically factual possibility, after all.

Our Squiggly Play-Doh Planet

And so, it remains a “proven fact” that the Earth has always been the same size, and that the continents with their 400 to 600 kilometer deep solid granite roots have somehow split up and gotten back together, over and over again through inferred Earth history. They move, they shuck, they split, they jive, they squirm, they squiggle, they disappear and reappear.

You can watch the “factual” reconstruction, provided by National Geographic:

Hey, it’s a fact. And science doesn’t lie.

(Except when it does…which is whenever it has to protect itself from criticism and bolster a failing model…which is ever-so-slightly very very really super very often. Can I say “always?” Yes. I think I can safely say that today’s science “always” lies. But, it’s in our best interests, I’m really very slightly certain).

Let’s See What’s Behind Door Number Two

Here’s the alternative: The Continents have, in fact, stayed where they are, embedded with their 400 to 600 kilometer deep roots into the Earth, with the Earth expanding – growing – from underneath. Here’s how the artist and researcher Neal Adams presents it [Click].

And here’s an academic version [Click] by James Maxlow – a student of Sam Carey, who pioneered this field. Oh..right. Sam Warren Carey.

Sam Carey kicked the mainstream establishment’s derriere in the 50’s and 60’s to re-examine their burial of poor Alfred Wegener’s hypothesis. He’s the reason we have this theory. But he added: The continents fit together because the planet has Grown. And the mainstream…right. Buried him.


Maxlow’s Reconstructions

So, good for the Japan Times, for being out of the reach, for a moment, of the Papal-Scientistic Elite, who do everything they can to kill free intellectual discourse and examination of today’s ruling theories.

And what d’ya know, say the Devil’s name, and he appears. “Skeptic” magazine, that great defender of academic “facts” is here to let everyone know how absolutely criminal it was of the foolish Japan Times to talk out of turn:

“Case in point – three articles by reporter Jeff Ogrisseg in The Japan Times about the pseudoscientific notion that the earth is growing. I understand that The Japan Times generally has a good reputation as a serious news outlet, so that lends a high profile to the nonsense Ogrisseg is spreading.

I don’t expect science journalists to be experts – just to have a working knowledge of how science functions, and some idea how to figure out which ideas have merit and which are fringe.

Ogrisseg gets everything wrong, most significantly in how he misrepresents the process of science and how consensus is achieved in science.”

“Piddly Posh!! He just gets everything wrong! Boo Hoo Hooo!! Won’t somebody stop him?! Don’t listen to the bad, bad man!”

Want to meet the scientific elite? You can tell them by their wet diapers.

So, go read the articles by Jeff Ogrisseg at the Japan Times. They are very good, fair, and honest. They are a nice introduction to the controversy, to Expanding Earth theory, and to some – and far from all – of the failings of plate tectonics/subduction theory. The writer is open-minded, curious, and critical, and in today’s academic and news climate, that qualifies as being something else – Brave.

And so, I’ve written a friendly…oh, maybe not so friendly note to the manufacturers of “fact” at Skeptic. And so can you, if they’ll post what you write. They haven’t posted mine!

And I’ll leave you to do your own reading…

More on Tectonics, Torsion, Subduction Troubles, Sea-Floor Dating, Planetary Growth, and More…

Cheerios,

Liam

Star Spits Out Baby Planet – Electric Suns Redux

In “Electric Suns and Pregnant Planets,” plasma researcher Wal Thornhill postulated that stars were electrical phenomena, which acted as focal points for the charged particles and energies that pulse and spiral through the universe and galaxy. He further explained that gas giants are lower-voltage stars which fission from larger bodies, and which themselves expel the hot rocky mineral material that we call planets – that we call home.

And if that sounded like something you’ve never heard before, I urge you to have a read and a listen to my interview with Wal, and to review his work at Holoscience.com, because it seems yet another of his remarkable predictions is being proven true by observation:

Headline: STAR SPITS OUT BABY PLANET

The discovery of a baby gas giant planet orbiting a young, 12 million-year-old star means that these types of planets can form much more quickly than previously thought. Jorge Ribas reports on the finding. Discovery Video

Thanks to good timing, diligent detective work and a little luck, scientists have determined that a suspected bulge in the dusky disk surrounding the nearby star Beta Pictoris contains a giant gas planet, one that formed incredibly fast given the relative youth of its parent star. Discovery.com

They’re not the most awe-inspiring baby pictures, but new infrared images prove the youngest known planet outside our solar system does in fact exist—and that planets can grow up fast—a new study says. National Geographic.com

It certainly gives the impression that stars give birth to planets, and it happens fast…

Take that, ‘big bang‘ theory.

What does it mean? It means that facts are not facts, they are temporary opinions, waiting for a better explanation. It means that science is not infallible, or unchangeable.

Take that Anthony Fauci….Your time is gonna come.

. . . . . .

Thanks to Michael Gmirkin for noting and passing on the breaking story.

Electric Suns and Pregnant Planets

Big Bang?

How did we get here? What are stars? What are planets? How did life come to exist on Earth?

These grand questions are approached by a scientific mainstream that asks us to believe in their unifying myth – that the universe is, first, an accident, starting with an inexplicable ‘big bang.’ That stars are nuclear furnaces that somehow formed from collapsed clouds of dust by a very weak force – gravity. And that are planets clumped together from the left-overs of star formation that just happened to avoid becoming part of the star.

But is any of this true? It would surprise most grade-schoolers (and their teachers) to learn that all of these ‘facts’ have failed the test of time, and that astronomy is in such bad shape that a “crisis in cosmology” has been cooking for decades behind the scenes, hidden from the general public (who nevertheless foot the bill for increasingly speculative, non-productive research).

Australian physicist Wal Thornhill is among those working in a new science, plasma cosmology, who are seeking testable, verifiable, reproducible answers to the larger questions of celestial and terrestial existence. These plasma pioneers are looking at the universe through a different lens than their Newtonian predecessors.

Their “Electric Universe” model puts electromagnetic energy, and not Newtonian gravity as the primary generator of celestial phenomena. Electromagnetism is a force well-studied by electrical engineers, but has been ignored in Astronomy as a prime mover thus far, despite the fact that space is filled with magnetic fields and charged particles. Electromagnetism as a force is 10 to the 39th power stronger than gravity in terms of attraction, and unlike gravity, can not only attract but also repel objects.

Thornhill and other plasma cosmologists contend that stars are not gravity-based nuclear furnaces but are in fact bodies of electrified plasma. The gravity-based model of stars has failed to predict a single quality of stellar existence or behavior. On the other hand, the plasma/electrical model predicts all the major characteristics of stars, and places them in an organic system in which gas giants and rocky planets are born of a powerful electrical process in stars, and not due to the weak attraction of gravity on dust in space.

Thornhill trained in physics and electronics at Melbourne University before working for IBM. Today he is an independent researcher, and is one of the world’s few specialists in the field of plasma cosmology. He is a founding member of the Thunderbolts project (thunderbolts.info).
Continue reading Electric Suns and Pregnant Planets

In the Dark with Dark Energy, A Letter to Smithsonian Magazine

Smithsonian Magazine, the enjoyable and informative publication of the Smithsonian Institute, devoted some 6+ pages of glossy print to Richard Panek’s article on “dark matter” and “dark energy,” (a teaser for his impending book on the invisible subject).

Don’t know what dark energy is? It’s invisible. It can’t be measured. It can’t be seen. It exists because astronomers say it does, because they need it to. Why? Because it holds their version of the universe together. (Their version? Yes, their version – not the observable universe, but their current approved theory).

Am I being too hard on the dear lads at NASA? Let’s test my appraisal. The article features the following image, which will tell you all you need to know about “dark energy,” (which does not exist).

“- Michael Turner coined the term “dark energy” in 1998. No one knows what it is.”
Continue reading In the Dark with Dark Energy, A Letter to Smithsonian Magazine

What's Wrong With The Big Bang?

“Since the mathematicians invaded the theory of relativity, I do not understand it myself anymore.” – Albert Einstein

“In the beginning there was nothing…which exploded!” – Terry Pratchett

Independent researcher David Drew, author of the website Plasma Cosmology.net walks us through some of the problems with Big Bang theory and the gravity-only universe.

First there was nothing, then there was everything – this is a summation of Big Bang cosmology. Is this theory testable? Is it true?

Where has the Big Bang model failed? Are there better explanations for the shape, size and motion of the objects today’s superior telescopes reveal in outer space?

Please check out David’s webpages, which offer a nice introduction to the topic of plasma cosmology. David is a contributor to Thunderbolts.info and his very active YouTube channel is Soupdragon42.

icon for podbean | Play in Popup

Are You a Polyphasic Liquid Crystal?


– Collagen Molecule

I want to share with you excerpts from several items I’m reading, more or less unfiltered. It goes like this:

We’re all connected, right? Everybody says so – somewhere beneath the surface, we’re ‘one,’ part of a single organism, being, entity. Everybody’s had an experience – touching, sensing, feeling, knowing – transmitting information, thoughts, feelings, ideas, images, across a room, in the presence of a friend, or someone you’re just meeting, or in a place, or waking from a dream, or in a dream itself… We’ve all had bits and images of feelings of connection and knowing and transcendence despite our rational selves…. Despite our ‘scientific, modern’ idea of an accidental, mechanical world – something we inherited from the 17th Century, caught in the wake of René Descartes’s Enlightenment discoveries of logic and method.

But to prove it? You can only say it, know it, feel it. Share it with people who understand. But prove it? Is there a ruler, a graph, a measuring stick for this sort of thing?
Continue reading Are You a Polyphasic Liquid Crystal?

Peer Review Reviewed

I quote her with care, as she derails easily, but it’s a well-stated opinion:

“If there is any one way to confess one’s own mediocrity, it is the willingness to place one’s work in the absolute power of a group, particularly a group of one’s professional colleagues. Of any form of tyranny, this is the worst; it is directed against a single human attribute: the mind–and against a single enemy: the innovator.

The innovator, by definition, is the man who challenges the established practices of his profession. To grant a professional monopoly to any group, is to sacrifice human ability and abolish progress; to advocate such  a monopoly, is to confess that one has nothing to sacrifice.”

– Ayn Rand, “The Return of the Primitive”

Take that, peer review

On that note, and after years of observing it, I can agree that the value of peer review truly seems to be to repress movement. “Reproducibility” should be the measure of success in any venture, and reproducibility can be seen by any 3rd grader…

I Finally Get to Meet a Real Astronomer

by Liam Scheff
Jan 1, 2010


The Big Scam

The first thing you should know is that I don’t really believe in the Big Bang. I mean, no, I don’t believe in it at all, for a variety of reasons, which I’ll boil down into a singular potato for you:

I don’t believe it because it’s not true.

Okay, I’ll do better. But it requires some explanation of my particular philosophy.

I am of the opinion that the sciences have taken the place of the religions of the past. That they have inherited the position of ‘answerer of existential questions,’ that used to fall to the Church elders, before the Church was up-ended by Galileo, Bruno and Copernicus – but really, by the relentless march of technological progress by the human species.

Today’s sciences now hold the place of dispensers of great truths, and of great mysteries. “Why are we here? Where do we come from? What are we made of? Why do we get sick? How do we get better? Why do we think these thoughts? Where does our creative spirit come from? Where do we go after we die? What is the meaning of it all…?”
Continue reading I Finally Get to Meet a Real Astronomer