All Your Theories Are Wrong

TruthFrequencyRadio

On today’s show! Current theories (mythological frameworks) of science that are completely wrong:

AIDS theory.
Cancer theory.
Viral theory.
Genetic theory.
Darwinian evolutionary theory.
Big bang astronomical theory and its children:
Black hole, dark matter, dark energy ‘theory.’
Plate tectonics theory.
Vaccine theory.

Current social theories that are completely wrong:

Marriage for life.
Monogamy is natural.
Capitalism.
Nuclear family.
Prohibition (of intoxicants, plants).

Feel at your absolute liberty and leisure to walk up to any of your friends, acquaintances or colleagues and inform them of these realities:

“Oh, you still believe that? Vaccine theory was completely wrong! They’ve known that for decades! A century! AIDS theory? You’ve got to be kidding me! Was never true. Big Bang? Please! Grow up.”

Add your own. Argue it. Ask why. Read the critics.

Liam Scheff is author of “Official Stories,” drilling to the core of the gooey religious center of science.

We Are Living in a Cult of Science

by Liam Scheff


– A More Transparent Tribal Ritual

For your consideration: You think the Reformation and Enlightenment turned back the darkness of Medieval religious meddling? Ha! and Ha! I say. Hardly.

Let’s have a look at what religion has become.

The Major Religions of Science:

Baptism = Vaccination.

A spiritual blessing upon entering the world is transfigured into a physical injection of toxins in a toxic world.

Monogamous Marriage = AIDS Ribbon.

The ‘swinging’ 60s and 70s gave way to a reactionary bit of propaganda; ie, that you could now get a sex disease that: 1. Didn’t show up on your genitals. 2. Didn’t make you sick for 10, 20, 30, 40 years or more. 3. You had to be told you had it by a Clinician (High Priest or Cleric), 4. You had to tell everyone you knew about it, and put an end to your ‘single’ cavorting.

Coming of Age Mystery Ceremonies = HPV Vaccine.

The passage into sexual adulthood, once marked by mystery ceremonies and first sexual experiences is now replaced by an injection with toxins (a re-baptism), based on a witch hunt for a ‘virus’ (evil spirit) that they say will (eventually, maybe, maybe not) corrupt your virginhood, your saintly pristine sexuality – but only after 40 or 50 years.

Don’t believe me? Do the research into any one of these fields to sort out the technical details. HIV Testing, Bird Flu Witch Hunts, HPV Fraud, Human Sacrifice, Toxic Misdirection, and Vaccine Horrorshows.

Get it? We’re a Tribal-Animist-Christian-Scientific cult.

All of us.

Shit. Any desert islands left? I’m about ready to find one.

———-

Liam Scheff is a journalist and author of “Official Stories,” because “official stories exist to protect officials.” 

Remembering the Swine Flu Plague of… When Was That, Again?

by Liam Scheff


– Don’t catch a cold!

File under: “How stupid are we?” I noted this in 2009. It’s worth a revisit:

The deadly swine flu! See if you can spot the problems with the mainstream narrative:

“LA GLORIA, Mexico: Tucked away in this small mountain village in Mexico, off a dusty road flanked by pig farms, is where the earliest case of swine flu — a virus spreading globally — was confirmed.”

(Pig farms? Feces lagoons? Pesticides, antibiotics, nitrogen, bacteria, colon products – in ‘lagoons?’ And we’re confused by illness?)

“Meet the child known as “patient zero” by his doctors — 5-year-old Edgar Hernandez, who survived the earliest documented case of swine flu in an outbreak that, officials say, has now spread across four continents.”

(It has spread! It must have killed everyone in the town!)

“His family lives in the 3,000-population village of La Gloria in the state of Veracruz, where a flu outbreak was reported on April 2. State officials arrived and tested dozens of people.”

(Dozens! Dozens of people living around feces lagoons… didn’t… feel… well!!)

“Edgar has managed to bounce back from his symptoms and playfully credits ice cream for helping him feel better.”

(Dear God.. NOOOOO!!!!! Noooo. I mean. Oh.)

(Okay. So…. Right. Can we learn more about this scourge?)

“LA GLORIA, Mexico — Everyone told Maria del Carmen Hernandez that her kindergartner’s illness was just a regular cold. But it seemed like the whole town of 3,000 was getting sick.”

(Oh NO! It seemed like 3,000 people living around pig farms… uhm.)

“As early as February, neighbors all around her were coming down with unusually strong flu symptoms — and the caseload kept growing. When state health workers came to investigate March 23, some 1,300 people sought their medical help. About 450 were diagnosed with acute respiratory infections and sent home with antibiotics and surgical masks.”

(Well! 450 people had respiratory problems. 1,300 had “unusually strong flu symptoms. Like… headaches? Diarrhea? Gosh. Sounds like pesticide poisoning).

“Five-year-old Edgar Hernandez was still healthy then. Hernandez wanted to keep him home from school so he wouldn’t get sick, but her husband said, “We can’t be afraid of what might or might not happen.”

(But, I thought he was “patient zero?”)

“Then he came home with a fever and a headache so bad his eyes hurt. She took him to a clinic, and after a few days of antibiotics, he too recovered.”

(Oh. He wasn’t. He didn’t. Right. Ice cream. He’s fine! Okay! They gave him antibiotic-rich ice-cream, and didn’t look for pesticide poisoning. But, how is he patient zero?)

“His family lives in the 3,000-population village of La Gloria in the state of Veracruz, where a flu outbreak was reported on April 2. State officials arrived and took samples from dozens of people.”

(Dozens of cases of swine flu! NOOO!!!!)

“Lab tests confirmed that Edgar was the only patient in Veracruz to test positive for the swine flu virus; the others had contracted a common flu. Health officials had returned to Edgar’s sample only after cases of the new flu strain were spotted around the country.”

(What? Nobody else ‘tested positive’ on the (crap) non-specific test? So, although he was the LAST of 1,300 people to feel sick… he was the only one “with” swine flu? (Or, the only one who tricked the (crap) test?)

(But, it’s the swine flu PANDEMIC! It must have killed to cause an international emergency!)

“Meanwhile, Mexican health officials suspect the swine flu outbreak has caused more than 159 deaths and roughly 2,500 illnesses.”

(Oh NO! They… SUSPECT!!!!! That is… hm. Uhm.)

“The World Health Organization says at least 105 cases have been confirmed worldwide, including 64 in the United States; 26 in Mexico; six in Canada; three in New Zealand; and two each in Spain, the United Kingdom and Israel. WHO has confirmed deaths only in Mexico, where seven people have died from swine flu.”

(OH NO! A hundred and five people have had an ICE-CREAM FLU!!! Dear God..no. No. Hm. Seven deaths in Mexico. Maybe near…pig farms? Where people live near…Feces Lagoons!? No. Couldn’t be a ’cause’ of illness. Lagoons of feces. Please!)

End of slideshow.

So, let’s summarize? Some VERY FEW people around the world (105 cases of a cold!) get a sniffle. The WHO hunts for it with non-specific tests. It kills a few with antibiotics. Some die of pesticide poisoning.

What about the factory farming? Wait…we do that here! Hey! Let’s visit Iowa!

• The nearly 733,000 hogs on factory farms in Plymouth County, Iowa, produce twice as much untreated manure as the sewage from the Dallas-Fort Worth metro area.
• The more than 857,000 hogs on factory farms in Hardin County, Iowa, produce three times as much untreated manure as the sewage from the greater Atlanta metro area.
• The more than 1 million hogs on factory farms in Sioux County, Iowa, produce as much untreated manure as the sewage from the Los Angeles and Atlanta metro areas combined.

And it’s not just hogs that are crammed into the state’s factory farms. According to FWW, Iowa’s vast confinement facilities also house 1.2 million beef cattle, 52.4 million egg-laying hens, 1 million broiler chickens, and 64,500 dairy cows. Altogether, this teeming horde annually churns out “as much untreated manure as the sewage from 471 million people—more than the entire US population.”

Keeping such titanic amounts of shit out of water is a near futile task.

There are occasional spectacular incidents—FWW points to the time in 2008 when spring floods “destroyed at least 3 hog factory farms near Oakville, drowned up to 1,500 hogs and flooded manure from storage pits downstream into waterways throughout eastern Iowa.” [LINK]

– “This is one of the lagoons. It’s pink because it’s filled not just with shit, but with porcine afterbirths and blood and chemicals and medicines and trash and anything that falls through the grates in the sheds where the pigs are kept. And Smithfield makes one of every four pork products sold in the States. They rule the industry. And that’s the real problem: industrial farming. Pigs are bred and killed in quantities difficult for us to imagine, but if you took the populations of America’s 32 largest cities and killed and sold them, you’d have an idea of the scale on which Smithfield operates.” [LINK]

Gooooo, Iowa! Gooooo, North Carolina! Back to Mexico….

After calls to the American CDC, the WHO shows up and, deflecting attention from pesticides and toxins, covers up a toxic spill or pesticide spraying. How? By using non-specific testing. They do it in every field.

In sum, a case of toxicological, environmental poisoning became an international ‘swine flu.’ Rinse, wash, repeat.

Articles quoted: New York Daily News.
This! is CNN.

—–

Liam Scheff is a journalist and author of “Official Stories,” because “official stories exist to protect officials.” 

If Every Virologist Quit His or Her Job Today…

One World Under Pharma 3 by Liam Scheff 2010

If everyone in the world who works in ‘virology’ were to suddenly and all at once quit – and stopped hunting for what they perceived to be ‘viruses’ inside of laboratory cell cultures…

Not one person on Earth would drop dead because of it.

But, if everyone who worked in virology were to suddenly become interested in a body’s response to toxins – to poisons, pesticides, injections, sprays, aerosols, plastics, EMFs, GMOs, fluoride and chlorine – and they all banded together to make the ‘scientific community’ work tirelessly against the poisoning of the entire human species….and they were successful —

Millions and probably billions of people would enjoy a level of health so greatly improved that it provided a happiness and service to the world that a great faith in doctors as healers would surely be returned to the medical profession for centuries to come.

– Liam Scheff 4/2013

Are You a Slave?

by Liam Scheff

Are you a slave? Does the government have the right to tell you who you can mate with? Do they own your body? The bodies of your children?

Are you a slave?

And, what are you shopping for today?

I approached the Magic Johnson-sponsored ‘Free HIV testing’ van, in the Fort Lauderdale mall parking lot, and asked the HIV testing dude if I could see a package insert for the magical test.  This is the technical instruction and legal disclaimer; the limitations of the medical device – the antibody test.

The HIV testing dude gave me a bit of paper – a PR sheet. I handed it back, and asked again for the test insert. He looked blankly, and handed me the same sheet. He did this twice, and tried a third time. I said, “Don’t give me that paper again – I’m asking for a package insert.”

He eventually gave up, and asked the foreman to come talk to me. A 50-something gay dude came out, and gave me a booklet – the package insert. I opened it, and found the language, as it always appears –

*No, we fooled you, suckers  – this is not really a test for hiv…*

  • “The Clearview Complete HIV assay is intended for use as a point-of-care test to aids in the diagnosis of infection… This test is suitable for use in multi-test algorithms designed for the statistical validation of rapid HIV test results.”

“Algorithms. multiple tests. Aid in diagnosis.”

Not, “This test diagnosis X, Y or Z.”

But, “Uhm, we help, sort of, aid, also, don’t use this test, use others.”

No, it’s not an HIV test. It’s a joke. A tool to make you believe you’re being tested for something…

And on we go:

  • “The Clearview Complete HIV assay is not approved to screen blood, plasma, cell or tissue donors”

(Wow! Sounds accurate!)

  • “A reactive test result using the Clearview Complete HIV test suggests the presence of antibodies to HIV…”

(Wow! Scientific! Thanks for the “suggestion!” How very ‘hypnotic’ of you…And how hypnotized you’d have to be to buy any of it).

  • “The Clearview Complete HIV assay is intended is an aid in the diagnosis of infection with HIV.”

(It’s an “aid!” A ‘helper!’ Not really a test. How wonderfully useless. How grand. How life-changing, for those who don’t bother to read the fine print…)

  • “A person who has antibodies to HIV is presumed to be infected.. except that a person who has participated in an HIV vaccine study may develop antibodies and may or may not be infected…

(Uhm… Gosh. Uhm… Who’s doing all of this presuming? I’m going to make another presumption: This isn’t a test for any particular particle. Is that a valid presumption? I think it is…)

The test then states that half of the syphilis-infected blood samples were positive on the “HIV test.”

  • “AIDS and AIDS-related conditions are clinical syndromes and their diagnosis can only be established clinically.

Ah, the money shot. We’ll tell you, by looking at you, and seeing what kind of person you are – drug addict, black dude, poor white momma, or gay party boy – whether or not we can affix the “HIV-AIDS” sign to your prow, and you’ll let us make it stick.

“So, does this isn’t an HIV test,” I say to HIV test dude #2. “Why do you tell people that you are giving them a diagnostic test?”

“Oh,” we never say that, said the 50-something gay man, enslaved to the cult. “We send them for a Western Blot.”

“But,” I reply, “The UK doesn’t even use Western Blots. They’re too cross-reactive. They consider them junk. Did you know that?”

“Nooo.” He said.

“Have you ever heard of the Padian study?”

“Noooo,” he said.

And so went the exchange.

I asked if they had people who would come on the radio. He said they had a PR department for that kind of thing. I said, not PR, but a technician, somebody who could handle detailed and specific questions.

Well. We’ll see.

World sex-fraud-terror day is humping toward us… December 1st is the day when you’re supposed to believe that a world of impoverished people need bone-killing drugs more than food and clean water.

Do you believe it?

Are you a slave? Do you entrust a government-pharmaceutical panel, or complex with the delicate fabric of your sexual identity, choices, wishes, dreams, excursions, explorations?

Of your future, your children’s future; their very flesh and blood and bone?

You will know your identity by your response:

Slave. Non-Slave.

You can only check one box.

Free yourself from HIV testing. Turn in your result today – send it back to your doctor, or technician, and tell them you “Presume” otherwise.

And figure out how to care for yourself, without government hand-outs, drugs, permission – or slavery.

And if you want to live your life as a slave – then be my guest. But keep your misery to yourself. I just don’t give a damn anymore about HIV slaves.

Flu Vaccines – The Mainstream Admits, We Want an Epidemic!

by Liam Scheff

for the Robert Scott Bell show and Natural News

Listen to the discussion on the Robert Scott Bell show.

Vaccination is a near-religious plank of modern medicine. But what good is it to inject people with proteins and viruses grown in animal and human body parts and tissue, mixed with metals and dangerous, aggravating chemicals?

A new report from “The Lancet” medical journal gives some idea. New research on the value of flu vaccines states that the yearly injection is “only 60 percent effective.”

So, 60 percent of people who take the shot do not get the flu? [Link] What can this mean but that 40 percent of people who take the shot do get the flu?

The numbers that are being paraded are actually “59% effective,” leaving 41%, ‘not protected,’ I suppose, from the flu.

In an analysis of 31 studies published in Thursday’s issue of the Lancet Infectious Diseases journal, U.S. researchers concluded that since the vaccine often differs the from virus circulating each flu season, the effectiveness averages only 59 per cent in healthy young adults. [Link]

It was reported last year in the alternative health media (NaturalNews.com) , and even in the brainwashed junk-science worshipping media (NPR) – that flu deaths, far from reaching the 30 plus thousand per year, really hovered somewhere between Three thousand, and forty-nine thousand.

What? Somewhere between  three and forty-nine thousand? Do I get a free toaster oven with that estimate?

The real number may be as low as 1,000, as reported on the Robert Scott Bell show, by guest researcher Peter Doshi, who arrived at that figure by removing, from the CDC’s own statistics, cases in which death occurred because of “secondary complications.”

With a half-million people dying of prescription drugs in this country every year, you can easily bolster ‘flu deaths,’ with some of the deaths-by-medicine.

It’s all so dodgy that even NPR (or, as I call it “Neural Prosthetic Radio” because it gives you the illusion that you’re thinking) a news agency funded by agricorps and pharma mafia like ADM and Monsanto, Squibb and Pfizer, has no choice but to report that they have no idea how to report on the flu:

“We’re still mulling over exactly what we’ll say in our reporting – we definitely say “tens of thousands die from flu, on average, each year.” But whether we get more specific than that is still under discussion. Your ideas are welcome.”

Tens of thousands? But it might be 3,000. Or 1,000.

But if flu deaths are as low, by official estimates, as 3,000, and probably lower, then we have to look at flu cases, by their numbers.

If the CDC and pharma mafia get their way, 100% of the U.S. population would be injected with the monkey-kidney-aluminum-adjuvant brew (called a ‘vaccine’ to sell it better). In a population of 300 million, approximately, we would then expect what percentage of people to be “protected” from the flu?

The answer: 59%.

So, by their numbers, 41% of 300 million vaccinated people – or 123 million people – would get the flu every year.

Can we say “deadly epidemic?”

Half the U.S. population suffering influenza? Government shut-downs, police emergency, quarantine of schools, malls and public areas.

Cats and dogs sleeping together – True panic in the streets!

We can view the mainstream statistics for “the number of people who get sick OR die from the flu each year.” The CDC lists it as “Five to twenty percent” of the population.

“Flu seasons are unpredictable and can be severe. It is estimated that, on average, approximately 5% to 20% of U.S. residents get the flu, and more than 200,000 people are hospitalized for flu-related complications each year.” [Link]

Five to Twenty percent? I think I need a better estimate.

Will this number stick? Or will it be reconfigured in the coming months as health freedom doctors and activists put the screws to the numbers, and see what gives and what holds?

Let’s take their low estimate of five percent. Compared with 41% of the vaccinated group, this seems like a tremendous relief – even a blessing.

At 41% “non-protection” (ie, people who get the flu), we have a major national crisis. At 5%, spread out over a year, we have life as it has always been lived.

But the mainstream is jockeying for 100% injection, and therefore, a 41 percent failure rate. We can see by their own admission, that this is not only the inevitable result, but the intended result.

The short version: Every time you run to get vaccinated, you are enlisting yourself in a waiting crew of epidemic victims.

My advice to any who value their health: Do not inject yourself with poison. Instead, learn and study natural, whole food and natural supplementary methods of dealing with colds and flus. [Link and search your own]

 

Listen to the discussion on the Robert Scott Bell show.


Peter Doshi:

“Are US flu death figures more PR than science?” BMJ 2005; 331:1412 (10 December)
“Viral Marketing: The Selling of the Flu Vaccine.” Harpers Magazine. March. 2006.

April Boden Reveals Big Pharma’s Plan to Destroy California’s Children

by Liam Scheff

for the Robert Scott Bell Show and Natural News

On Tuesday’s Robert Scott Bell Show (10-10-11) April Boden, vaccine activist, blogger and mother of a vaccine-damaged six-year-old in California, revealed her deeply insightful take on the politics of the two – count them, two – vaccine bills, that were just passed by Governor Jerry “Drug-Fever” Brown.

According to April (http://aydansrecovery.blogspot.com), “The whole thing was entirely calculated. On one hand you have bill AB499 which allows a minor to consent to vaccines without parental knowledge, on the other you have SB946 which is about autism insurance reform.”

These two bills were put to Governor Brown for approval on the same day, a crass calculation says April, as they pit one and the same group of activists – those concerned or mortified by vaccine damages – against each other. The first bill, AB499, allows students in public schools – and minors all over the pharma-crazed State of California – to be given drugs for any presumed sexually transmitted disease, including the Gardasil vaccine injection.

But is HPV truly an STD? It occurs in some 80 percent of the human population. It is a harmless wart virus that does not – I repeat – does not “cause cervical cancer,” despite what the pharma propaganda machine tells the sleep-walking public. According to even the mainstream’s statistics, close to 99 percent of women who ever have the ‘virus,’ never get the disease! How’s that for ‘proof of causation?’

The reality is this: HPV is an entirely common nothing of a virus, which like most “viruses” is expressed under cellular stress, and which is suppressed or made completely inactive in a healthy, well-regulated cell.

Cells which are nurtured and fed essential nutrients, like essential fatty acids, selenium and glutathione regularly stop the expression of “viruses.” Cells which are dysregulated, starved for nutrients and intoxicated by chemicals, pesticides, heavy metals and neurotoxins often express viruses. We encourage viral expression in bodies which are starved and abused. And let’s stop to note that the very chemicals and agents which damage cells are precisely those which constitute vaccines!

But the once “hippy” Governor isn’t interested in nutrition, or cellular health, or even that long-forgotten concept of “choice” that Liberals claim to care for with such passion. No, he wants children to be able to “opt in” to eugenic ‘science’ programs that would make Goebbels blush with pride. Now ten-year-olds can be propagandized at school with the anxiety-provoking lie that they have to be afraid of getting genital cancer from something that almost everybody in the world has at one time or another.

And now they can ask for – and receive – the dangerous Gardasil or Cervarix vaccine. And ‘dangerous’ is not hyperbole. This injection has already killed close to a seventy girls, young women and some boys, whose parents trusted the State-pharma complex.

The second bill, SB946, is supposed to help parents with vaccine-damaged (‘autistic’) children pay for medical care, rehabilitative education and special needs. But April, in reading the fine print, found that the bill is like the electronics you buy at Best Buy on a whim – it is obsolete before you get it out of the store. The bill expires in two years, at which point cash-strapped parents will have to muster more free time to fight the state again.

April writes: “[The bill] only pertains to private pay insurance; State-paid insurance will be exempt.”

In other words, those who can afford to pay for insurance are getting a hand. Those too poor to purchase exorbitant insurance, are stuck with a broken and decrepit State system.

And April notes, “It does not prevent insurance companies from raising rates as a result. In the meantime California is reducing its State funded programs for autism left and right – so what happens when the insurance companies start picking up the tab?”

“People won’t notice that their State funded programs have been removed until 2 years later when they are saddled with higher insurance premiums and no services. But people have short term memory and will have completely forgotten how they got there.”

The HIV Clause

How deeply has big pharma parasitized the State of California? April spied a rider to the bill that’s a real blood-sucker: “There is an additional, tag-along clause in SB 946 regarding HIV reporting.”

But what does “HIV reporting” have to do with Autism? Or even Gardasil? The answer is – California is broke, and in order to make up its endless budget shortfall, it is selling its children into pharmaceutical slavery.

Here’s how it works. Beyond asking for Gardasil, children in California can receive handfuls of the FDA’s most deadly drug – AZT – for another phony diagnosis – that of “HIV positive.”

AZT is a bone-killing, blood-suppressing, liver-destroying drug, recycled as a failed chemotherapy agent into the gay community in the late 1980s. It was given to gay men who were told they were “HIV positive,” but it did not help. The shameful and oft-hidden reality is that the death toll attributed to “HIV” in the 1990s was a direct result of AZT. Hundreds of thousands of gay men took high doses of the drug, though they were not sick, and died a short, agonizing death as a direct result.

The numbers tell the story – before the introduction of AZT, the “AIDS” death toll in was a little above 10,000 per year. After AZT, the number jumped to close to 50,000 per year, and stayed there until AZT was reduced from 1200 milligram doses, down to one or two hundred milligrams. AIDS researchers claimed a victory at that point, but the reality was that they just stopped killing so many patients so quickly. This is a well-known and ‘open secret’ in the AIDS community, but like all uncomfortable truths, it is swept under a rug, out of sight of the American public.

But the biggest open secret in ‘HIV care’ is the tests themselves. HIV tests come up “positive” or reactive for hundreds of reasons – there is no end to the number of cross-reactions that occur with this obscenely immoral test. HIV tests do not test for any particular particle – they are cross-reactive with proteins that every human body produces daily. The medical literature demonstrates ably that HIV tests come up positive for the ingredients contained in – get this – HIV tests! That’s right. Taking an “HIV test” can itself make you “HIV positive.” And so can being vaccinated! Having the flu! Drinking milk! The list goes on and on.

And if a child of a parent who has been given this false diagnosis requests a test, in California, she or he can receive one without parental consent, or even awareness – and the drugs will follow: AZT, its many clones, and the drugs which replaced it – less toxic in the immediate dose, but fatal in the long-term.

A parent never has to know. Your child can go to school, be filled with anxiety and dread about diseases which they do not have, request drugs which will kill them, and receive them, eat them, swallow them, and be poisoned by them, all without your consent or awareness. You never have to say “yes.” You never even have to know.

And your child can come home, and fall ill with a mortified liver, or unheard of gastric problems, or skin that peels off in bloody swaths – such are the well-recorded effects of Gardasil, AZT or Nevirapine. And no one will ever be able to tell you why; and no one will be responsible.

Increasing the Numbers, Selling Children to the State

April revealed the ‘insurance’ bill as a wholesale scam to get insurance companies off the hook for vaccine damages. The poor get nothing, the State removes the help it now offers, and two years later the whole thing disappears. But these agents of pharmocracy have also crafted an add-on, one that will increase the number of “HIV positive” young people – especially lower-income victims of government schools. April writes, “When a person comes up HIV positive it must be reported to the State Health Officials. This generates revenue for the State. However, there’s a lengthy form that many don’t bother to fill out.”

But, says April, the insurance bill “does away with the form, allowing them to put the person diagnosed with HIV on a list, thereby increasing the number of reported cases, and increasing the revenue for the State.”

So what’s the harm, you ask? We’re reporting more cases to the State. But remember, these tests and diagnoses are criminally negligent, and allow doctors to sell the most toxic – and most expensive drugs – to entire populations. But what if the populations can’t afford the drugs?

That’s where you come in. The tax-payers pay drug companies to give deadly drugs to the “HIV positives,” in California, and around the world.

“And you’d better believe that in the next reporting cycle we’ll see headlines reading ‘California HIV rates soar.'” says April. “People will have no idea this is due to this change in law, and will be begging for the HIV vaccine. Low and behold there is already a law in place that will allow minors to – you guessed it – take the HIV vaccine without parental consent.”

“Moonbeam knew what he was doing.” She says. “Both of these bills were to be signed as planned on the same day as a mirage. Parents will think, ‘Victory on one side, defeat on the other.’ But really the only one who wins is Big pharma; increased revenue for the State so they can continue their raids on health food stores. And Brown probably confused people enough to get re-elected.”

The result of this crisis is that there will be more dead children. More deaths from vaccines and deadly chemicals given to minors – both U.S. citizens and illegal aliens. Is this an undercover targeting of the poor in California? Or are do-gooding liberals so in love with the myth of ‘better living through chemistry’ that they can’t be bothered to read one single package insert from an actual drug or test that they mandate?

Either way, the only solution to this crisis is to nullify Brown’s ruling. Parents must withdraw all consent from the State to perform medical procedures on their children, even if that means pulling them out of public schools, and starting a home-schooling or charter school in your area – or in your home. Further, ‘we the people’ have to share medical information openly and without concern for what the Federal Government considers appropriate. If they won’t show us the package inserts, and give us freedom of choice, then we will.

It is up to you – everyone reading this – to go and talk to your friends, family, school officials, local parent groups, about these deadly myths: The myth of the ‘virus that causes cervical cancer.’ The myth of ‘life-saving AIDS drugs.’ And they myth of ‘HIV testing.’

These may be hard subjects to broach, but we all have a responsibility to self-educate, and to save those who cannot yet make critical decisions from a State which has been lobotomized by an infected ‘science,’ which cares nothing for facts, critical thinking, compassion or choice. We must all of us, every day, fight tyranny, most of all by interjecting reality into the public square, by speaking about controversies, and by supporting independence of thought and action throughout our troubled country.

Gardasil and Cervarix Realities, Side Effects, Dangers:

HIV Testing:

AIDS Drugs:

“HPV The Virus That Causes Cervical Cancer???”

by Liam Scheff

You hear it and read it everywhere: “HPV – The virus that causes cervical cancer.”

But is it true? The correlation is something like this:

Out of a million women, 1600 (drug-addicted, late middle aged prostitutes who never go for pap smears) will develop cervical cancer.

Counting? That’s precisely…

.16 Percent.

And this counts as “cause?” In other words, 99.84% of women who “have HPV” do not ‘get cervical cancer.’

These are their statistics: .16% equals “causation.”

“Although HPV infection is common, the majority of men and women clear the virus from the body and don’t suffer from any squealae of the infection, says Dr Suresh. Only one per cent of men with HPV get warts while of a million women with HPV, only 1,600 get cancer if not screened.” [Malaysia Oncology/Asia One ]

1,600 out of 1,000,000
160 out of 100,000
16 out of 10,000
1.6 out of 1,000
.16 out of 100

.16 Percent.

Can you see why they started with a million? (Because 1,600 is scarier than 16 hundredths of a percent).

And who are they? Drug addicts, late middle aged prostitutes, or others in ‘high risk groups’ for every disease. Most importantly, they are, according to the medical experts, women ‘who never have pap smears or go for a gynecological check-up – ever.’

And that’s a generous statistic. Here’s an actual sample from the US:

“For example, in the state of Maryland, 9.3 out of every 100,000 women contracted cervical cancer in 2003. Without considering any of the personal risk factors (like cervical cancer in the family), the general risk for someone living in Maryland would be 9.3/100000 or .0093% chance of contracting this disease.” NaturalNews.com | www.statehealthfacts.org

In 2006, it was 6.7 per 100,000 women, or .0067 percent. Bring that up to match the “out of a million” and you end up with the following:

6.7 out of 100,000
67 out of a 1,000,000

Sixty-seven out of a million women. Not 1,600. But, in a real-world sample, sixty-seven per million.

Can we have our moment of “duh?” (to quote our friend Robert Scott Bell)

Note: Seaweed blocks “Cervical cancer virus”:

“The researchers found that carrageenan [Kelp extract] strongly inhibited different HPV strains’ ability to attach and therefore enter human cells. “We were floored by how much better it worked than anything else we have tested,” says Schiller.”

And healthy people “clear” the ‘virus’ sans difficulté’.

“Roughly 50% of sexually active women between the ages of 18 and 22 are infected with human papillomavirus (HPV) at some point, although their own immune systems can clear infections caused by the less aggressive strains.” New Scientist

“50%?” National statistics put it up to 75 and 80% prevalent, and still, no ‘cervical cancer pandemic.”

“Aggressive strains?” Do they mean in the .009% of late middle aged drug abusing prostitutes? Who have no concept of gynecological health and never ever ever or ever go for checkups?

No, it’s not a problem of individual lifestyle or health. This IS a National Emergency!

Can we all sue the Government now for fomenting such absurd fear-mongering? Or, just ignore them en masse. Always the best strategy…

But, how many young, healthy girls have been injured or crippled by Gardisil? Hundreds? Thousands. How about deaths following vaccination? Twenty? Forty? Sixty?

And counting…

TruthAboutGardasil.org

Google Search Gardisil, Injuries

And now, they want your boys, too…

Addendum

Please read Cal Crilly’s article at RTB, which points out the incredibly important toxicological factors that DO cause cancer. Cal asks what the researchers missed:

“What about all the other chemicals middle aged women are exposed to!! What about the pill? HRT? Benzene?!”

The Bird Flu Breakdown: Two Children in Vietnam

This article was originally published in May of 2006 at LiamScheff.com. It is presented here with updates noted under the section titled “Modified Specifics.” This was research I did concurrently with the initial publication, but was not able to wrangle into the first writing. – LS 2/2011


– flu survivors in Vietnam

The much anticipated bird-flu plague has yet to emerge, despite much hue and cry. This comes as no surprise to those of us who are familiar with the machinations of the WHO (World Health Organization), CDC and NIH, and their pharmaceutical partners.

But, for those more trusting of public health authorities who wish to know more about the making of public health policy, I thought I’d review some of the bright and shiny inconsistencies that have come into view on the bird flu.

Stray Cats and Chinamen

In March, 2006, The Associated Press reported: “In Austria, state authorities said Monday that three cats have tested positive for the deadly strain of bird flu in the country’s first reported case of the disease spreading to an animal other than a bird.”

The report quoted the World Health Organization (WHO), which said that “bird flu poses a greater challenge to the world than any infectious disease, including AIDS…”

Really? Bigger than AIDS? Who knew? But why would it be so? Because three cats in Austria tested positive? What does that mean? How many cats, in all of Austria, did they test? What would happen if you tested every cat?

How about every bird? How about every person? Do we know how many people actually have tested positive for bird flu? Maybe a dozen? A couple hundred?

How about millions.

Continue reading The Bird Flu Breakdown: Two Children in Vietnam

Rethinking Polio

Please find below my rough ‘show notes’ for the RSB radio broadcast [older link]. Feel free to add  in comments, and follow along

Listen live Thursday February 24, 12 Noon EST.

Review PCR:

 

Polio Notes:

1. Polio is Toxic Poisoning

The Industrial Age was marked by a constant stream of injury and accident, poisoning of the human population by metals, arsenic, and a dozen toxic compounds used in new industry. Chemical poisoning, not ‘viruses’ are the major cause of illness in the modern world:

LINK

1700s to 1970s and beyond – toxic, industrial poisoning was the norm; paralysis, illness, death occurring all too regularly:

1700 Italy: Cotton dust caused a significant outbreak of respiratory complaints (byssinosis) during the pro- cessing of cotton, flax, and soft hemp.

1767 Devonshire, England: Lead-contaminated cider caused colic; later, gout was associated with this same episode.

1700s England: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons caused excess scrotal cancer in men who were exposed as chimney sweeps.

1800s New Jersey: Mercurous nitrate used in the felting process of the hatting industry led to mercurialism.

1800s Europe: Yellow phosphorus used in the manufacture of matches led to “phossy jaw.”

1828 France: Bread and wine contaminated with arsenious acid caused an estimated 40,000 cases of polyneuropathy [major nerve damage, ie, ‘polio’ or ‘multiple sclerosis’].

1846 Canada: Lead from soldered cans contaminated foodstuffs in the Franklin expedition.

1900s Staffordshire, England: Arsenic-contaminated sugar was used in beer manufacturing.

1900s United States and India: Naphthylamine used in the dye industry resulted in an increase of bladder cancers.

1910 Manchester, England: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were associated with scrotal cancer: 24 in active mulespinners (cotton textile factory workers), 5 in former mulespinners, 1 in a chimney sweep, and 22 in tar and paraffin workers. Shale oil was used to lubricate the spinning cotton spindles.

1915 to 1918 Ypres, Belgium: Chlorine, phosphorus, and mustard gases resulted in 100,000 dead. Overall, there were 1.2 million deaths from chemical warfare in World War I.

1920s to 1990s Worldwide: Asbestos exposure resulted in a marked increase in asbestos-related disease and cancer.

1928 Cleveland, Ohio, Cleveland Clinic: Nitrocellulose-containing x-ray film burned. Cyanide, nitrogen dioxide, and carbon monoxide were generated during pyrolysis. This resulted in 97 deaths immediately and 26 additional deaths during the next month.

1930 United States, Europe, and South Africa: Triorthocresylphosphate resulted in ginger jake paralysis, a neurotoxic disease affecting tens of people.

etc., etc. The list goes on and on…

1952 – Dr Ralph Scobey testifies before a subcommittee of Congress that “Polio” is toxicological:
http://www.whale.to/a/scobey2.html

The Poison Cause of Poliomyelitis And Obstructions To Its Investigation
by Ralph R. Scobey, M.D. Syracuse, N.Y.
Statement prepared for the Select Committee  to Investigate the Use of Chemicals in Food Products, United States House of Representatives, Washington, D.C.
From Archive Of Pediatrics (April, 1952)

The disease that we now know as poliomyelitis was not designated as such until about the middle of the 19th Century. Prior to that, it was designated by many different names at various times and in different localities.1,2 The simple designations, paralysis, palsy and apoplexy, were some of the earliest names applied to what is now called poliomyelitis.

Paralysis, resulting from poisoning, has probably been known since the time of Hippocrates (460-437 B.C.), Boerhaave,3 Germany, (1765) stated: “We frequently find persons rendered paralytic by exposing themselves imprudently to quicksilver, dispersed into vapors by the fire, as gilders, chemists, miners, etc., and perhaps there are other poisons, which may produce the same disease, even externally applied.” In 1824, Cooke,4 England, stated: “Among the exciting causes of the partial palsies we may reckon the poison of certain mineral substances, particularly of quick silver, arsenic, and lead. The fumes of these metals or the receptance of them in solution into the stomach, have often caused paralysis.”

Colton5 (1850) mentions the case of a patient who swallowed some arsenic accidentally and was admitted to the hospital. The primary effects of the poison had been successfully combated with proper remedies, but seven days afterward he became paralyzed. It is significant to note that there was a latent period of several days before the paralysis appeared since this delayed reaction is comparable to the incubation period in infectious diseases.

Vulpian6 (1879) experimentally produced paralysis of the extensor muscles of a dog by lead poisoning. The lesions, consisting in colloid degeneration and cell atrophy of the anterior horn cells of the spinal cord were pronounced by Vulpian as poliomyelitis. Adamkiewitz7 (1879) reported two parallel cases, one of poliomyelitis and one of lead poisoning.

In 1881, Popow8 of St. Petersburg, published an essay upon the pathological anatomy of arsenical paralysis as produced artificially in animals. The work of Popow was carried out under the guidance of the distinguished neurologist and microscopist, Professor Mierzeyeski. Popow concluded that arsenic, even in a few hours after its ingestion, may cause acute central myelitis or acute poliomyelitis.

During an epidemic of poliomyelitis in Australia in 1897, Altman 9 pointed out that phosphorous had been widely used by farmers for fertilizing that year. This observation may be of significance since in recent years organic phosphorus insecticides, such as parathion, have been suspected as possible causes of poliomyelitis.

Onuff 10 (1900) reported a case of a painter [paints were lead based] with flaccid paralysis of both legs, in whom the autopsy showed lesions characteristic of poliomyelitis.

Obsrastoff 11 (1902) reported a case of acute poliomyelitis resulting from arsenic poisoning. Phillippe and Gauthard 12 (1903) reported a case of anterior poliomyelitis from lead poisoning.

Gossage13 (1902), writing on infantile paralysis, says: “The nerve cells or fiber may be acutely disabled by the action of some poison circulating in the blood, and it is possible that such poison would only temporarily impair their functions or so seriously affect them that recovery would be impossible.”

Dr. David E. Edsall14 (1907), writing on the pathology of carbon monoxide poisoning in Osler’s System of Medicine, states: “Peripheral neuritis had repeatedly been described and poliomyelitis and disseminated encephalitis have been seen.”

Collins and Martland15 (1908) reported a case of poliomyelitis in a man, 38 years of age, which resulted from the use of cyanide as a silver polish. The illness began with diarrhea, followed by headache and pain and stiffness in the back of the neck. About eight days after the onset of the illness, he became paralyzed. In discussing Collins and Martland’s paper, Larkin stated that he had seen one instance of this disease following potassium cyanide poisoning.

In the spring of 1930, there occurred in Ohio, Kentucky, Alabama, Mississippi and other states an epidemic of paralysis.16,17 The patients gave a history of drinking commercial extract of ginger [Jaked Ginger, with organophosphates]. It is estimated that at the height of the epidemic there were 500 cases in Cincinnati district alone. The cause of the paralysis was subsequently shown to be triorthocresyl phosphate in a spurious Jamaica ginger. Death resulted not infrequently from respiratory paralysis similar to the bulbar paralysis deaths in poliomyelitis. On pathological examination, the anterior horn cells of the spinal cord in these cases showed lesions similar to those of poliomyelitis.

Vaccination was on the rise in the 30s, 40s; and vaccination for pertussis and other ailments also Cause polio:

Dr. Ralph Scobey:

In 1936, during a campaign to eliminate yaws in Western Samoa by the injection of arsenicals, an epidemic of poliomyelitis appeared simultaneously.23

In one community all of the patients developed paralysis in the same lower limbs and buttocks in which they had received the injections and this pattern was repeated in 37 other villages, whereas there was no paralysis in uninoculated districts. The natives accused the injections as the cause of the epidemic of poliomyelitis. Most of the cases of paralysis occurred one to tow weeks after the injection of the arsenic.

The foregoing reports indicate that poisons can cause poliomyelitis. It would appear that not any one poison in particular would be responsible for all cases of poliomyelitis but the effect of any one of several could produce the same ultimate result. When a disease is known to be caused by a poison, it is obvious that a search for a germ or virus in relation to it would not be made. Conversely, if a so-called virus is believed to be associated with the disease, then the possibility of poisoning as the cause of the disease would not be considered. It will be shown, moreover, that some so-called virus diseases and virus inclusions can be caused by poisons.

All of this was KNOWN. And ignored.

The Vaccine movement, promoted by the FDR Whitehouse, promoted actively, supported DDT spraying and soaking of infant’s rooms, clothes, and of children at the beach:


http://www.google.com/images?q=ddt+spraying+children&
http://kstevens.pbworks.com/w/page/5646970/Human-Price
http://cdn.dipity.com/uploads/events/6f809c51b9f1c9784a29542b959afea9_1M.png
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jVJ6pmotK_s/TCeCyTo2BlI/AAAAAAAAC6M/fNYeeYCNBAY/s1600/uesc_04_img0176.jpg
http://caosblog.com/archives/6751
http://www.collectibles-articles.com/antique/1947-Tokyo-Japan-Children-DDT-Guns-Lice-Spray-Photo_150533001371.html

Dr. Morton Biskind protests, to Congress, regarding the toxicity of DDT, and its role in “Polio”:

http://www.whale.to/a/biskind_h.html

Following a recent extensive trip through the South, Dr. Mobbs informed me that wherever DDT had been used intensively against polio, not only was there an epidemic of the syndrome I have described but the incidence of polio continued to rise and in fact appeared where it had not been before.   This is not surprising since it is known that not only can DDT poisoning produce a condition that may easily be mistaken for polio in an epidemic but also being a nerve poison itself, may damage cells in the spinal cord and thus increase the susceptibility to the virus.

In this connection, an observation reported by Dr. Albert B. Sabin in the Journal of the A.M.A. in June 1947 is significant: “Since the end of combat in the Phillipines, poliomyelitis has been among the leading causes of death in American troops. Even though only the paralytic cases are reported from there, the incidence of poliomyelitis in American troops in the Phillipines has been at least ten times as high as in the Army within the continental limits of the U.S. during the past two years.  Actually, I believe that it is even higher because hundreds of cases which would have been diagnosed as dengue-like or sandfly-like fevers… under conditions which , in my opinion, would preclude the occurrence of both dengue and sandfly fever. And yet checks of the surrounding native population revealed no outbreaks of poliomyelitis.”

DDT is an organochlorine, and a neurotoxin.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDT

Baby cows which drank milk from momma cows fed DDT sprayed feed develop…”Polio”:
http://www.vaccinetruth.org/james_west_ddt.htm [From researcher Jim West]

US Department of Agriculture found that although fodder treated with DDT caused no damage to the cows eating it, the health of their calves was severely impaired, sometimes with fatal results. The DDT was passed along from cow to calf via the milk (Van Nostrand’s Encyclopedia of Science and Engineering, Van Nostrand Reinhold 1995, v 5, p1775). DDT is a neurotoxin and the calves developed something very much like infantile poliomyelitis. Calves weren’t the only infants drinking cow milk during the early 1950s.

Mothers are propagandized:
http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/02/01/ddt-is-good-for-me-e-e/

“DDT is good for ME-E-E!” Says US Govt to moms.

Children are doused. Polio rates hit new highs in the early 50s, after a decline, before the DDT ‘epidemic.’

The HUNT for a Vaccine is on. Researchers grind up human remains, animal remains, feces and debris, and inject it into the brains of monkeys, to “prove” one particle was causing “polio.”

Roberts – Polio – A Shot in the Dark – http://reducetheburden.org/?p=2778

In 1908 two scientists working in Austria, Karl Landsteiner and Erwin Popper, reported that they might have found an ‘invisible virus’ that had caused these epidemics. They had made their discovery, they claimed, after making a suspension in water of minced diseased spinal cord from a nine-year-old victim of infantile paralysis. They had tested this noxious suspension by injecting one or two cups of it directly into the brains of two monkeys. The monkeys fell severely ill (as might have been predicted). One died and the other had its legs paralysed. The scientists then dissected the monkeys and found damage in their central nervous tissues similar to that found in human cases of infantile paralysis.

Nevertheless, the following year Simon Flexner and Paul Lewis of the illustrious Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in the US ‘proved’ a similarly made noxious soup was ‘infectious’ by injecting it into the brain of one monkey. They then extracted some fluid from its brain, injected this into another monkey, and so on through a series of monkeys, paralysing all of them in the process. Flexner and Lewis reported: ‘We failed utterly to discover bacteria… that could account for the disease [paralysis]… The infecting agent of epidemic poliomyelitis [probably] belongs to the class of the minute and filterable viruses that have not thus far been demonstrated with certainty under the microscope.’

In other words, we’ve injected a cocktail of viruses, cellular debris and DNA into a series of monkeys, and we believe that a virus, not yet identified within this noxious cocktail, is responsible! The procedure of Flexner and Lewis was just as dubious as their conclusion: they took no account of the contaminants in their mashed-up soup; they presumed what happened in monkeys would be replicated in humans; and surprisingly, given the evidence around at the time, they didn’t inject samples of cyanide or lead into the brains of monkeys to see if they also caused paralysis. In 1910 neonatologist L Emmett Holt reported: ‘Even five years ago if anyone had suggested that the disease under discussion was an infectious or contagious one, it would have been looked upon as a joke.’

Polio vaccination begins; Polio rates increase, and the percentage of severe and paralytic polio skyrockets.

http://www.fearoftheinvisible.com/whohides
Janine Roberts:

From contemporary reports there were nine times more polio cases in 1957 than in 1956, and that they were more serious than ever before. In the first 8 months of 1957 the Public Health Service reported, out of a total of 3,212 polio cases, there were 1,055 cases of paralysis, or 33.5% of the total. From January 1st to August 1958 there was a total of 1,638 cases of polio, with 801 of them paralytic, or 49% of the total.

KRASSNER, GARY
http://www.whale.to/a/krasner1.html

PARALYSIS INCREASED FOLLOWING THE SALK VACCINE

An Associated Press Dispatch from Boston on August 30, 1955, reported 2,027 cases of polio in Massachusetts against 273 the same time the previous year-representing an increase of 743%. This followed the inoculation of 130,000 Massachusetts children, and the authorities banned the vaccine. Connecticut reported 276 cases in 1955, up from 144 in 1954; Vermont, 55 up from 15; Rhode Island, 122 up from 22, and Maine, 74 up
from 43.

The Washington D.C. Star, September 20, 1955, reported 180 cases in Washington against 136 the same time in 1954; Maryland’s Health Department reported 189 in 1955 to 134 in 1954; New York State, 764 to 469; Wisconsin, 1655 to 326. The Milwaukee Journal, on August 30, 1955, reported that the city’s schools closed indefinitely because of the polio outbreak, following inoculation with the Salk vaccine.

Idaho stopped Salk inoculations completely on July 1, 1955, with this blast from State Health Director Peterson said, “I hold Salk vaccine and its manufacturers responsible for a polio outbreak that has killed 7 Idahoans and hospitalized 79.” By September 14th 1955, that state had 190 cases compared with 132 for the entire year of 1954. Newark, N.J. stopped inoculations in June, 1955, while Utah took similar action on July 12.

An Associated Press dispatch on November 11, 1955, quoted Dr. Herbert Ratner, Health Commissioner of Oak Park, Illinois, who said that “English authorities in July, 1955, canceled the Salk vaccine programs as ‘too dangerous’, and all European countries, with the exception of Denmark, have discontinued their programs.” Canada also postponed its Salk vaccine program on July 29, 1955.

The New York Times on May 11, 1956, reported on Supplement No. 15 of the Poliomyelitis Surveillance Report for the year which showed 12% more paralysis in 1956 than in 1955. By January 1, 1957, 17 states had rejected their supplies of Jonas Salk’s “anti-paralytic” polio vaccine.

During this year very nearly half the paralytic cases and three-quarters of the non-paralytic cases in children between the ages of 5 and 14 years occurred in “vaccinated” children.

The Expert Committee on Poliomyelitis of the World Health Organization stated in its Technical Report Series, No. 145 (Second Report, p. 34 Geneva, 1958) that:

“It was noted in the Union of South Africa and in the USA, especially in the course of severe outbreaks in Hawaii and Chicago, that vaccination in the face of an epidemic did not appear to shorten its course. Laboratory and field studies have shown that vaccination does not prevent infection or interfere with dissemination of virus in the community.”

Polio was relabeled ‘aseptic meningitis,’ and the criteria for defining ‘polio’ was changed, so that it was very difficult to give anyone a ‘polio’ diagnosis: [Krassner]

After 1955, NON-paralytic polio also acquired a new name. It wasn’t until the mid-1950’s that new laboratory techniques of culturing viruses could distinguish THIS polio from its clinical twin, aseptic meningitis. Before 1960, not a single case of “aseptic meningitis” was reported. Then, it was called (non-paralytic) “polio”, and nationally had totaled 70,083 between 1951 and 1960. But from 1961 to 1992, there had been 220,365cases of aseptic meningitis. There were only 589 cases of non-paralytic polio from 1961 to 1982. Not a single case has been reported since.

Non-paralytic polio may have “disappeared”. But thousands of children still experience the same symptoms as non-paralytic polio every year. Except now, it goes by another name.

Besides the name game, the (presumed) decline in polio due to the Salk vaccine was also an artifact of diagnostic methodology. Prior to 1954, the diagnosis of spinal paralytic poliomyelitis followed the World Health Organization definition: “Signs and symptoms of nonparalytic polio, with the addition of partial or complete paralysis of one or more muscle groups, detected on two examinations at least 24 hours apart.” But beginning in 1955 following the introduction of the Salk vaccine, the criteria changed to conform more closely to the definition used in the (fraudulent) 1954 Salk field trials: “Unless there is residual involvement (paralysis) at least 60 days after onset, a case of poliomyelitis is not considered paralytic.” Laboratory confirmation was possible after 1955, but not required for diagnosis. Obviously, more cases of paralysis had a chance to recover within 60 days, than in 24 hours. As intended, paralytic polio decreased by 23,500 cases from 1955 to 1957. However, after 2 years of widespread uptake of the Salk vaccine, paralysis increased about 50% from 1957 to 1958, and about 80% from 1958 to 1959. (The Sabin oral vaccine supplanted Salk’s by 1961.)

It’s necessary to remember that polio was viewed as mostly, 90 to 95%, non-paralytic.

Asymptomatic:  90–95%
Minor illness:  4–8%
Non-paralytic aseptic meningitis: 1–2%
Paralytic poliomyelitis: 0.1–0.5%

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poliomyelitis

Now, the polio ‘bug’  is considered to cause about .5% rate of paralysis. In other words, it is believed to be 99.5% non-paralysis inducing.

But, this ignores all toxicological poisoning.

And then there’s this: Most people around the world already tested “positive’ for the little stomach bug BEFORE they were vaccinated. And none of them had “polio”, ie, illness and paralysis:

Roberts: Polio – A Shot in the Dark
http://reducetheburden.org/?p=2778

Other holes started to appear in the virus theory. During WWII army doctors found widespread immunity to the suspected poliovirus, and no evidence of infantile paralysis epidemics, in the Middle East, Asia and Africa. In Turkey they found people who called infantile paralysis ‘the American disease’. The doctors were surprised: immunity to the virus presumably meant that it had infected the population. So, how come it caused no epidemics in these countries?

Salk claimed that his vaccine protected ‘30 to 90 per cent’ of those who received it (a remarkably vague statistic). But more than 60 per cent could have been immune already, at least according to the theory of the US federal agency the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that working-class children were already immune as a result of exposure to the virus in dirt. It is not known if Salk ever checked to see if children were already immune before he vaccinated them, but Hilary Koprowski reported in 1957 that the inhabitants of the Congo were 85 per cent immune before they ever saw a dose of polio vaccine. (Amazingly this didn’t stop Koprowski. He went on to uselessly administer to them hundreds of thousands of doses of his experimental vaccine.)

Also, it should be noted that most cases of “polio” today are, in fact, not ‘associated’ with the little stomach bug (a tiny particle, about 1/1000th the size of a cell). These cases, the majority of paralysis occuring, are called “non-poliomyelitis acute flaccid paralysis,” or, Non-polio polio!

http://www.google.com/search?q=non+polio+acute+flaccid+paralysis

These cases occur in countries which use – organophosphate and organochlorine pesticides… go figure…

The medical authorities now ‘associate’ many ‘viruses’ with non-polio polio. Epstein Barr, Guillan-Barre’, Coxsackie, and West Nile.

http://www.google.com/search?q=epstein+barr%2C+polio
http://www.google.com/search?q=epstein+barr%2C+coxsackie%2C+polio

But they still don’t want to look at toxicology. Because, as a wise man once said, “You can’t sue a virus.”

So, why do we vaccinated everyone in the world against a bug that doesn’t cause illness?

And what are we ‘vaccinating’ them with?

What are the proteins, contaminants, bacteria, mycoplasma, heavy metals, adjuvants, and other contaminants? And what do they do in the body?

Here’s an answer:

Polio incidence increased after vaccination. Polio Vaccination was considered a morbid disaster of ruinous proportions in the 50s. Paralysis rates shot up exponentially. Children were quickly paralyzed, and in the arm WHERE they were injected.

The medical establishment to you: “Huh! What a coincidence!”

You to the medical establishment: ???????? … !!!!!!

Radio This Weekend – The Official Story

Join Liam Scheff and guests for this weekend’s radio shows:

Listen live or download MP3 for later, on the Intel Hub.

Toll Free Call In Number: 1 (877) 598-8549 or 646-727-3387.

  • Saturday 2PM EST: Treating Vaccine Damage. Liam welcomes special guest April Boden, mother of a vaccine-damaged child, and author of Aydan’s Road to Recovery. Are there solutions and treatments that can help reverse vaccine damage?

Thinking Critically about conspiracy theories on the Investigation with Liam Scheff

  • Are there conspiracies? What is a conspiracy?
  • What are the essential qualities of the human species that define us?
  • Curiosity, acquisitiveness, tribal hierarchy? Belief, myth, logic?
  • Is it useful or realistic to talk about “illuminati?” The great big “They” who do all evil in the world?

We explore and answer many of these questions… Right Click and Save to Download or Clcik to Play

Vaccines are not magical. They are made of …….. Do you want to know? ……!!!!

Scientific Fundamentalism
by Liam Scheff

When science is wrong, and does not admit it, it does more damage than when religion is wrong, and does not admit it.

While religion brainwashed with ideas, science injects with heavy metals. While religion suppressed emotion and expression, science suppresses life itself, by creating terminator seeds. While religion offered palliative myths to large existential questions, science offers palliative care, with deadly drugs, to prove its failures true.

All fundamentalisms are dangerous, and perhaps evil. Science has reached a stage of fundamentalism in our society, where vaccination, HIV testing, and pandemic hysteria have achieved the status of occult objects, of religious ceremony.

Science, today, as it is practiced, from Big Bang theory, to Darwinism, to AIDS, to Vaccination, is a fundamentalism. And must be opposed, challenged, its weaknesses exposed and understood, and reformed around better, newer, more open, flexible ideas.

Science needs a Reformation.

Have You Vaccinated Your Infant?

Tune into the Robert Scott Bell show, read Mike Adam’s Natural News – and keep up with the Government’s loving plans for YOU!

What is in a Vaccine?

“formaldehyde, aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, thimerosal, and polysorbate 80 (Tween-80), gelatin, ammonium sulfate, formalin, and sucrose, sorbitol, hydrolized gelatin, chick embryo, hydrolized gelatin, human diploid cells from aborted fetal tissue, aluminum hydroxide, benzethonium chloride, and formaldehyde, formaldehyde, aluminum phosphate, ammonium sulfate, and thimerosal, washed sheep RBCs, glycerin, and phenol -a compound obtained by distillation of coal tar, vesicle fluid from calf skins”

Read the rest at www.informedchoice.info

CDC to American Public: New Pandemic On the Way! No, really. No, really, We Mean it this time! No, REALLY!

“I wish they had tested and that I knew for sure whether they had it. I’m not anxious to give them an experimental vaccine if they don’t need it.”

However, the CDC recommendation for those who had “probable” or “presumed” H1N1 flu to go ahead and get vaccinated anyway means the relatively small proportion of those who actually did have H1N1 flu will be getting the vaccine unnecessarily. This exposes them to rare but significant side effects, such as paralysis from Guillain-Barre syndrome.


girl-getting-vaccinatedlg
Continue reading CDC to American Public: New Pandemic On the Way! No, really. No, really, We Mean it this time! No, REALLY!

Science Crossfire

By Liam Scheff
Salvo Magazine – Summer 2006

Here are three ideas that you will never see debated by the major media:

  • Was a bird-flu pandemic ever really likely?
  • Is AIDS in fact a sexually transmitted disease?
  • Does current evolutionary theory truly explain the diversity of life on earth?

Each of these widely-promoted beliefs is contradicted by more competing evidence than you can shake a stick at (from wide and varied sources), but you’ll never hear about it from the major outlets for science news – the New York Times, PBS, NPR, the BBC, or CNN – because the media simply doesn’t question the received scientific wisdom.

Because the major media doesn’t do science journalism the way it reports news.

When watch the news, we expect to hear crossfire and flak. We’re not flustered by divergent takes on policy. We feel that government business should be aired and battled over in the public sphere. We expect policy-makers and government officials to regularly submit to hard questions from the press, and to take the hot seat on the news shows.
Continue reading Science Crossfire

“There is No Such Thing as Bird Flu” – Says German Virologist

Academic medicine has been and is the most important pillar of support of all dictatorships and governments which do not want to submit to written law, to constitutions, to human rights, that is, to the democratically legitimized social contract.

– Virologist Dr. Stephan Lanka – Interview 10.27.2005

– flu survivors in Vietnam

Is there a bird flu pandemic? German virologist Dr. Stephan Lanka says no, and does so in detail. here

He makes some points that I’m sure will seem startling, but there’s a wonderfully no-nonsense, common-sense approach to his thinking (“Think for yourself, look into it yourself”), and a refreshing lack of fear-mongering.

Continue reading “There is No Such Thing as Bird Flu” – Says German Virologist

The Avian Menace

We’ve been told to prepare for a bird flu pandemic, but none has emerged. What’s happened since the initial reporting?

What was happening in Southeast Asia, where the majority of problems seemed to occur?

The major media has compared the the possibility of a flu-epidemic with what happened in 1918, at the end of World War 1. Is this a reasonable comparison?

We’ve been told that vaccinations and Tamiflu will help us, but is that true?

In sum, I haven’t heard these questions asked or answered by the major media or public health offices:
Continue reading The Avian Menace

Tamiflu – It kills rats, does it stop bird flu?

Roche Lab’s Tamiflu (Oseltamivir) is an anti-enzyme drug that’s being sold and sought widely in light of the much-fanned hue and cry over the potential flu.

Damn those birds (and call my broker)!

Tamiflu isn’t a new drug. It shows up in Roche’s roster back in 1999 – after they bought if from Gilead Pharmaceuticals, which designed it in 1996.

Continue reading Tamiflu – It kills rats, does it stop bird flu?

Bird Flu – Reality or Manipulation

I’ve been trying to tell a few fellow critical thinkers that the bird flu ain’t what it appears to be.

I will be providing more on that question in the days to come.

For now, it’s worth noting that the public’s tendency towards “Let’s Get Scared!” has given opportunity for a hell of a pharmaceutical bill.

Try this on for size – a bill poised to take away:

  • the FDA,
  • the Freedom of Information Act,
  • And your (or your family’s) ability to sue if you are injured or killed from use of a vaccine, drug or other pharma product.

Continue reading Bird Flu – Reality or Manipulation