I do not know if you might be interested in this, but the American news media loves to hype up propaganda about circumcision when it is in favor of circumcision, but when information is opposed to circumcision the news media becomes strangely silent.

You may have heard that the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has revised their stance in favor of circumcision claiming that “benefits outweigh the risks.” But have you heard the newsworthy information that many international doctors’ organizations have condemned the AAP’s stance on circumcision and have claimed cultural bias in the AAP’s report? It was reported in the AAP’s own journal!
Cultural Bias in the AAP’s 2012 Technical Report and Policy Statement on Male Circumcision
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2013/03/12/peds.2012-2896.full.pdf
http://knmg.artsennet.nl/Nieuws/Nieuwsarchief/Nieuwsbericht-1/International-physicians-protest-against-American-Academy-of-Pediatrics-policy-on-infant-male-circumcision.htm

This kind of condemnation is historical. How often do you or anyone hear of one doctor’s organization condemning another doctor’s organization? Here 38 doctors (many from various doctor’s organzations) condemn the AAP’s stance on infant circumcision! If you did not hear about this in the news media, would that not suggest that the news media is biased?

This doesn’t surprise you, does it?

Yes! Working on it – will be doing this soon. Stay tuned.

At some point will you be able to offer your books in audio form? I use audible.com and it would be great to have access to your books through this site.

Best Regards

it doesn’t bother me so much that that “building is exploding”. Ok, yes, it does. But what REALLY bothers me is the American public that believe the mainstream media on this shit. :-)

They’re LYING, people. Wake the fuck up.

Just because Anderson Cooper is pretty, doesn’t mean he’s telling the truth, generally-speaking. :)

“Boston” was a wake-up call.

I’ve started growing food, but securing clean water may not be terribly easy.

what if the average citizen questioned so many things that they do to their bodies and that get done to their bodies? They could start with your list, above.

I’d prefer to see people question, gain knowledge and empower themselves…thereby disempowering the folks that have abused and misused their power.

it’s been hard enough dealing with this issue with adults, who can *supposedly* think for themselves and make their own decisions regarding health and medicine.

I fear a self-fulfilling prophecy getting set to occur, here (and some punishment to “mom” for her transgressions against medical dogma…i.e. doing some homework and thinking for herself).

No…mom’s not sick. But if the folks that bring us “AIDS” had their way, she would have been dead a couple decades ago via AZT poisoning. So, now she needs to PAY. It’s too bad that it’s ultimately her child that’s going to do so.

Yeah…

right.

a host of relatively new terminology should be directed toward me.

“If” I have “HIV”…it’s “dormant” or “inactive” or “undetectable” (THOSE “options” weren’t available in the ’80′s). The list of EXCUSES for why a gay man ISN’T getting sick and dying of the dreaded “plague” would be hilarious, if it weren’t so incredibly serious.

WHAT is it, though? Which AIDS fantasy is the correct one? Did gay men die in the early 80′s due to a “retrovirus”? Or did they die due to having ALL SORTS of recurring STD’s from having sex with dozens and even hundreds of men (can’t imagine that that wouldn’t wear down ANYBODY’S immune system)? Did GRID (gay-related immune dysfunction) make sense? From everything that I literally saw happening at the time, it DID.

I remember the early days; and a friend of mine showed me his AZT bottle. It literally said: “toxic by inhalation”. Should I have just relaxed…realizing that he wasn’t inhaling it, but swallowing it, instead? :-)

I listened to your appearance on the Type 1 Radio Lounge discussing Judy Wood’s theory regarding the destruction of the Twin Towers. I tried to leave a comment below the YouTube posting but it likely won’t appear because they prohibit URLs from being posted in comments.

Judy Wood apparently proposes “Directed Energy” as the methodology for bringing down WTCs 1 & 2 on 9/11/01. Directed Energy technology isn’t exactly “fantasy-sci-fi” or a “Star Trek concept” as you call it. If it was, the Directed Energy Professional Society (founded in 1999) probably wouldn’t exist. You can visit their website at: http://www.deps.org/

Not surprisingly, this technology has also been weaponized. Take a look at this ad for a job position with U.S. Naval Intelligence Command: https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/314516300 (the position is closed so you’ll need to click the link “The contents of the announcement can still be viewed” then scroll down to “DUTIES”)

Thanks again for your studious work and lack of apathy. It’s much needed.

THAT bit of information…beside the fact that I’VE been ALIVE for nearly thirty years (as a gay man that’s had sex with, well, HUNDREDS of others) into this whole bit of bull****…

Well…either I’m the LUCKIEST faggot on the planet…OR…I’ve got the CCR5 gene deletion.

But our friends who test us…

DON’T TELL US…

ABOUT THAT POSSIBILITY!!!!.

But where would their “plague” be, if they did? :-)

If the accretion theory of planets is wrong that changes drastically common assumptions about the origin of life. There was no early era of “planetesimal bombardment” thus Earth (and any planet) might have been inhabitable very few million years after formation. In principle, could be 4.4 or 4.5 eons of biological evolution counting prebiotic stages.

I’m not so sure that it “seems”… :-)

It’s so fucking hard to just sort through all the shit that our wonderful “scientists” and “doctors” create for us.

I’ve been able to convince a friend that his Hep C is absolute bullshit, with a little help from Peter Duesberg (thank you, very much, Mr. Duesberg!). So, my friend, who should have been taking lovely, toxic therapy…hasn’t been. And he’s just fine. But, somebody he knows has been towing the party line, and is quite sick. But I’M SURE IT’S JUST THE HEP C THAT’S BEEN CAUSING HER PROBLEMS (or the alcohol intake), not the toxic “therapy”, of course. :) Sorry, kind of an aside…

No. Wait. Let me go on.

All the drug ads on television…

I can’t even believe how stupid people are in this country. But, to be honest, I’ve thought that since I was a kid. :)

NO DRUG HAS ONLY ONE EFFECT!!! NOT ONE.

But the stupid masses simply believe what the teevee tells them. No…they don’t tell us that their lovely drugs have only one effect, but they DON’T tell us that ALL drugs have multiple effects! And “we” trust that our friends in the pharmaceutical industry have our best interests at heart. Of course they do. They love us first! Then they want to make a profit, later (if at all!!!). Right.

*Sigh*…

Why. Oh. Why…are people so stupid? I mean that in the nicest way. :)

But today, it seems that the conclusion is drawn first, then data is collected to construct a hypothesis that supports the already drawn conclusion. Add to that the types of corporations that fund this “research” and you not only have a game, you have a simulated reality that would make a great move. It’s called The Matrix.

I was very much drawn to “science” as a kid. Religion…well, Christianity, just hurt my mind in a VERY big way. “Science” freed me from that pain and the dogma. I really believed science was about discovery and knowledge, but the older I’ve become, the more it appeared to be just another religion, with plenty of it’s OWN dogma.

One of the main pillars of science is that something must be proven to be true (correct me if I’m wrong, please). But how can the “big bang” be “proven”? The Big Bang is simply Science’s creation myth. I know…I know…the big bang is just a “theory”, right? It all sounds nice on paper, but it’s not TREATED as though it were simply a theory. It’s TREATED as a FACT. So, when our “scientific” friends want to, they can say “it’s just a theory”, and it’s “us” who are making it into something it’s not. It’s all a game, really.

Yes I believe language has value, indeed I am certain it has. The word does not belong to the speaker but it is the very thing or better said the addressed to whom it is property. That is why a prayer must not be captivated by a belief system such as Catholic, Protestant, Hindu, Buddhist and what ever we put behind; it is the mere expression of a soul communicating with heaven.

Yes, language has value, more than we know and I appreciate every attempt to save it’s very meaning, be it in English or in German and all the other great origins we humans created.