Now she’s playing the victim again. Or people are misconstruing what she said.

Was she tired again? Please.

Bringing up Robert Kennedy’s assassination was stupid at the very least. Accurately or not, Obama is often compared to Robert Kennedy. Coincidence?

Her campaign released a press release in order to clarify, that there were other historical references that she was considering citing, but felt that they would be even less approprite:

From the Clinton campaign1:

“We were first going with Malcolm X, but he was assassinated in February, so that was no good. Martin Luther King was April…so that was a no-go. That left Robert Kennedy as the obvious reference for summer political assassinations.”

On the other side, the Obama campaign was also considering some historical examples more appropriate for Mrs. Clinton1:

“We liked Marie Antoinette, but she was executed in January… Joan of Arc was executed on May 30. The date worked, but Hillary Clinton is no Joan of Arc.”

The Obama campaign said that they settled on an August date, more appropriate to the character of Mrs. Clinton:

“Leona Helmsly.” An August indictment.

1 All facts in the above parody are absolutely quotable, but not necessarily quotably factual. Some may have been “misspoken.”

Several days before Clinton used the A-word, there was a discussion on the Stephanie Miller show about Clinton being Obama’s running mate.

Ms. Miller jokingly said that if Clinton was the VP, that Obama should get a food tester.

She’s a terror. An absolute terror.

Doesn’t it make you look at the “long-suffering” years of “poor Hillary Clinton” in an entirely different light?

Who’s zooming who, is and was the question. I mean - who’s using who?

They’re a couple for the ages… the Dark Ages.

I wonder what was going on inside her thought bubble immediately after she said this.

Was it “note to self: think it, don’t say it”?