The issue of explosions and controlled demolitions of the twin towers is a red herring from the verifiable, undisputed evidence that indicts the real culprits behind the crimes of 9/11.
Controlled demolition theories – as plausible as they are – have always been bounced back and forth between “dueling experts” like a tennis ball which ends in more confusion than you originally started with. Physical evidence arguments don’t win the minds of the public.
Although it has become clear to me the public doesn’t want to – and never wanted to – know the truth about 9/11.
January 9th, 2010 at 7:47 PM
The issue of explosions and controlled demolitions of the twin towers is a red herring from the verifiable, undisputed evidence that indicts the real culprits behind the crimes of 9/11.
Controlled demolition theories – as plausible as they are – have always been bounced back and forth between “dueling experts” like a tennis ball which ends in more confusion than you originally started with. Physical evidence arguments don’t win the minds of the public.
Although it has become clear to me the public doesn’t want to – and never wanted to – know the truth about 9/11.
peace eternal
m>k<
[Reply]
January 11th, 2010 at 5:15 AM
Any theory can be bounced to and fro between or among experts. No idea is immune to this prospect…
But, you’re right – the public doesn’t want to talk about any of it.
[Reply]