Liam’s Daily…

Published at GNN, June 2008

- An orphan in New York City receiving Aids drugs - was he ever really infected?

The World Health Organization confesses that 25 years of international Aids projections and programs were based on fear, not evidence. But they still want you to believe them.

It is official: Aids is not explicable by sexual transmission. There is no heterosexual Aids pandemic, and further, there will be no heterosexual Aids pandemic.

“Threat of world Aids pandemic among heterosexuals is over, report admits”, The Independent announced on Sunday, June 8, 2008, mimicking what I have been reporting for years (and what some of my colleagues have been reporting for decades).

No, really. But take it from someone you trust, Dr. Kevin de Cock of the World Health Organization: “[T]here will be no generalised epidemic of Aids in the heterosexual population outside Africa.”

Read the rest of this entry »

The mainstream medical community is beginning to understand the limits of the Aids venture into Africa. Persons who are serious about improving the lives of the poorest in the world are thinking twice about the monies spent on the Aids campaign.

There is a call for the permanent disbanding of the United Nations Aids division, in order to re-focus efforts on the myriad of problems that plague Africans: Lack of food, water, work, safety, and basic medical care for malaria, tuberculosis, and dysentery.

The writing is on the wall for UNAIDS

By Roger England, chairman, Health Systems Workshop, Grenada
The British Medical Journal

HIV exceptionalism is dead—and the writing is on the wall for UNAIDS. Why a UN agency for HIV and not for pneumonia or diabetes, which both kill more people? [….]

UNAIDS should be closed down rapidly, not because it has performed badly given its mandate, which it has not, but because its mandate is wrong and harmful. Its technical functions should be refitted into WHO, to be balanced with those for other diseases.

Read the rest of this entry »

Before you submit to any medical test, you have a right to what’s called “informed consent“; that is, to be informed about the limitations of the procedure you’re about to undergo.

This legal right seems to have slipped the minds of the purveyors of what are known as “Hiv tests,” and for good reason - because the tests don’t work as advertised, (and they don’t want you to know that, because it would cost them, dearly).

But don’t take my word for it. If you think you can prove me wrong, or right, or you’re being asked to take one of these tests, then before you do, please seek answers to the following questions (and let me know what you find):
Read the rest of this entry »

And what should it say?

Twenty years of medical literature on what’s generously known as “Hiv Testing” tells us, over and over, that the tests come up reactive (positive) for at least 6 dozen conditions,

Are never truly “positive” or “negative”, but only shades of “reactive”,

Must be interpreted (according to socio-sexual-economic bases) for meaning,

And have no standard for this interpretation.

You can explore that literature here and here, or just do a google search on the subject.

So, if the tests are this bad, why don’t they have a warning, like cigarettes? They are more dangerous, because they give an irrevocable death sentence based on a non-existent, fraudulent test result.

Congress ought to hold a hearing on these tests, and get the FDA to do its job, and come up with an appropriate warning…

So, what should the warning on “Hiv tests” say?

Hiv Testing

The following is a public service announcement:

Know your rights: You have a right to informed consent, a right to read and review all critical literature on a medical procedure before agreeing to undergo it.

Know your rights: You have a right to read and review all critical literature on Hiv testing, before submitting to a test. You have a right to choose whether or not to take a test, based on your reading of the critical medical literature on testing. It is your legal right:

• To review all critical literature on the tests and on testing.

• To take or to not take a test.

Before you test, seek answers to the following questions:
Read the rest of this entry »

Stephen Davis’ new book is out, I’ve had a chance to look at a pre-publication version, and was quite impressed. I’ll have a longer look for a full review soon, but I can state happily and sincerely that it’s a good work - it is indeed ripped from the headlines - with the narrative flow and backing research to make it a very worthy read, and a worthy addition to the canon of literature on the morbid flaws in today’s quasi-religious medical establishment.

Have a look, and don’t miss the backing material that Davis makes available to critics and fans alike:

Have a look! Visit: http://www.areyoupositive.org/

In doing research on Cults in America, and specifically those that re-form themselves as schools for troubled teens, I found this handy chart (see below), taken from Dr. Margaret Singer’s book, Cults in Our Midst (at Factnet.org ) outlining some of the differences between education and thought reform (also called “brain-washing”), and some of the stops along the way – advertising, indoctrination and propaganda.

Which of these processes best describe your school days? Your grade school? High school? College?

Your work environment? A corporate work environment?

Where does television news fit in this array? National Public Radio? AM talk radio?

Where do the current Presidential candidates fit on the chart?

Where does the Bird Flu scare fit?

The HPV “Cervical Cancer” Vaccine campaign? Education or Advertising? Or Propaganda?

Aids Education? (See the previous exchange with Dr. Nick Bennett for one example).

The Public debates on Evolution? Global Warming? Abortion?

Read the rest of this entry »

Why, because he won’t post a single comment of mine on the blog he uses to libel me. Because he’s just that kind of great, great guy.

(Dr. Nick responds! See Addendum below)

Part: the First

I attempted to post this, three times, today, at Dr. Nick’s Libel Shop [HERE] Let’s see if he has the ginger to put it up:
Read the rest of this entry »

From the Alliance for Human Research Protection (bless their souls):

• “An ongoing investigation by the Vera Institute of Justice, has uncovered 59 additional New York City foster care children–between July and September–who may have been used in AIDS drug / vaccine trials in violation of federal regulations. This brings the tentative total number of mostly minority children involved, to 773.

Read the rest of this entry »

From the Associated Press

• BOSTON – A jury awarded $2.5 million in damages Wednesday to a woman who received HIV treatments for almost nine years before discovering she never actually had the virus that causes AIDS.

Read the rest of this entry »

Hearing Resumes in HIV Misdiagnosis Suit

WORCESTER, Mass. (AP) — Audrey Serrano received HIV treatments for almost nine years before receiving a stunning diagnosis: She never actually had the virus that causes AIDS.

File under:

The Associated Press reports that a Boston woman who has been taking “Aids drugs” (that’s FDA Black-Box labeled drugs, to you and me), for years has been profoundly damaged by them.

And she’s been taking them for no reason, whatsoever: She was never really “Hiv positive.”

So why is she sick? Look up “FDA Black-Box drugs” for a short answer; it’s the designation for drugs that kill or permanently injure patients who take them. You can line that up against the Aids industry’s typical line, “Life-Saving Aids Drugs,” and see the truth ends and the lies begin.

So, “Hiv tests” are not accurate? And Aids drugs kill? Never heard that on “Queer as Folk.” But is it true?

Illness and death from “life-saving” drugs? Well, yes, that’s what the Black Box is for.

Tests that test for nothing? Well, yes, the tests test for nothing particular, and then everything else, too.

Among those able to test “positive” without being positive, according to the sanctified medical literature:

• “Dogs, mice, babies, goats and cows, milkmaids, alcoholics, arthritics, moms, people with worms, ‘1,000 white suburban housewives,’ vaccine-recipients, drug addicts,” and then anyone else really, for “reasons that are unclear.”¹

Read the rest of this entry »

A new medicine has brought promise to Africa, to fight the disease that “destroys a child’s immune system, so they’re more susceptible to diseases and less capable of recovering from them.”

Thanks to the new treatment:

• “In three weeks, we can cure a kid that looked like they’re half dead.”

• “It’s just, boom! It’s a spectacular response,” Dr. Tectonidis says.

• [C]hildren that would have been hospitalized in the past can now be treated at home.

• “There’s many countries in Africa now saying, ‘We want a factory. We want a factory.’ Well let’s give it to them,” he says.

• “We just have to focus on these areas….We have to go for the jugular. Where are they dying? Where are they wasted? That’s where we have to intervene.

But not everyone has “Access” to the life-saving drug. The result?

• “Wasted life. Just totally wasted life for nothing. Because they don’t have this product.”

What’s the product? A new “Aids” drug? A condom? A new vaccine for “Aids?”

Read on:

Read the rest of this entry »

You heard it hear first! Extra! Extra! Four organ recipients in Chicago test.. (Negative, Negative), Positive!

Four Chicago transplant recipients contract HIV

• “Kuehnert said the organs came from a high-risk donor, meaning from someone who fit under one of several criteria that would increase the chances that the person might have be infected with HIV. Those include men who have had sex with another man in the preceding five years, intravenous drug users, prisoners, and people who have had sex for money or drugs.”

But no heterosexual sex? (Oh right, that only goes for Africans, I forgot…)

• “Dave Bosch of the Gift of Hope Organ and Tissue Donation, the regional organ procurement agency that handled the donor organs, said the donor’s high-risk status was confirmed on a questionnaire. “We were aware of that from the beginning,” he said.

• “But standard testing using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or ELISA antibody screening test was negative.”

Negative! Oh good! Because these tests are so accurate and reliable and predictable.. oh…

Read the rest of this entry »

The South African (and European) press want the head (or resignation) of South African President, Thabo Mbeki.

Why? Because of economic failings, corruption, poor governance?

No. They want him out of office, because he is an “Aids Dissident.”

Here’s how they frame it:

South Africa: Spotlight On Aids Denialism May Dent Mbeki’s ANC Hopes.
Read the rest of this entry »