The South African (and European) press want the head (or resignation) of South African President, Thabo Mbeki.
Why? Because of economic failings, corruption, poor governance?
No. They want him out of office, because he is an “Aids Dissident.”
Here’s how they frame it:
South Africa: Spotlight On Aids Denialism May Dent Mbeki’s ANC Hopes.
Read the rest of this entry »
I received an interview request from Nature Medicine regarding the BBC’s capitulation to the pharma cabal at Aidstruth.org. (Background on that story Here )
I have been slimed by Nature Medicine in the past, without ever being asked for an interview, so this is a first. I respond in some detail to the request, with some questions of my own for the reporter.
The bottom line:
Please see my post at Health Supreme on the “denialism” of Aidstruth.org. Then have a look at the ever-ready Anthony Brink’s press release on AZT and Thalidomide (at Treatment Information Group).
John P.Moore, Aids Denialist
by Liam Scheff
John P. Moore, of the New York Times, and of Aidstruth.org, on his approach to discourse and debate in science [Here ]:
The Aids Cabal is crowing glorious victory over their defeat of journalism, truth-telling, medical discourse and debate. That is, they’ve convinced the BBC to feel doubtful that the documentary “Guinea Pig Kids” should be allowed to stand, without correction from the pharma cabal that the film indicted.
John P. Moore of AidsTruth.org writes:
[Here]
[….end excerpt…]
So, a few notes on the documentary in question.
It was released at the near end of 2004, in November. I provided what is called, original research, which really consisted of pointing to the National Institute of Health’s (that’s the US government’s) own database of clinical trials, and noting that the drugs they were using were Black Box labeled, meaning they’d caused severe disability, or death, in patients taking them.
And that these were being used in combination of 2, 3, 4, up to 7 at a time, “at higher than usual doses”, in children as young as 4 years old. That’s orphans, as young as four, and then, other drugs and vaccines, in infants as young as six months old. [Here]
Read the rest of this entry »
Please contact the editor at the UK Guardian on their reportage:
email: editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 7239 9857.
From: Liam Scheff to editor@mediaguardian.co.uk
Dear Editor,
Please have your reporter, Leigh Holmwook, contact me, Liam Scheff, to correct the egregious errors in your reportage of the current attack on honest, critical, investigative journalism by the ‘AidsTruth’ pharma cabal. [Here]
Your reportage on this is missing more than half of the story. Your reporter Holmwood is quoting, at length, one Jeanne Bergman, activist for the drug use that is being criticized in the Guinea Pig Kids film.
You are citing the aggressor, not the aggrieved.
The issue at hand is the following - orphans in NYC were and are being used in clinical drug trials - “experiments” - with extraordinarily toxic drugs - as per the studies themselves.
Have a look at the title, the drugs, the warnings on every drug in the study, and the compound use of the drugs - seven at a time, in children as young as four years old.
Read the rest of this entry »
Who are these people?
John P. Moore, Martin Delaney, Jeanne Bergman, Nathan Geffen, Greg Gonsalves, Nicholas Bennett? [Here]
Who are these people, who have taken it upon themselves to inform every reporter, news organization, researcher, and individual in the world, what is and what is not acceptable to talk about, or think about, in relation to the medical (and quite religious) paradigm known as “Aids”, “Aids drugs” and “Hiv Tests?”
God knows, if you read the actual, critical, useful, necessary medical literature on any of these subject categories, you find a wealth of fascinating, horrifying information, always running in seven contrary directions from what the mainstream advertises as “Aids.”
But, heaven help you if you report any of what the literature lays out in evidence, or what real people who are affected by the tests, drugs and diagnosis testify to, because if you do, the “AidsTruth” clan calls you…
Read the rest of this entry »
Received by email:
Dear Liam,
What’s your take on this? Do you know about it already?
My take is that it doesn’t matter. I didn’t know about it, but I’d never rested my hat or laurels on the BBC movie. I was trying to help some kids…
Most of them are either locked into the system for life (or dead from drugs), or they’ve semi-escaped into NYC poverty.
There’s nothing more I can add to what I’ve done. It wouldn’t be fighting for them anymore, it would be fighting for some perception of ‘legitimacy’ in the eyes of an establishment that does little but cower and lie, pedal deception, half-truths, fear-monger, etc, as a status quo.
Read the rest of this entry »
Please visit Various and Sundry, where we’re having a fantastic discussion about the whole big mess.
Ta!
Bad day at Merck …. But good day at Boehringer Ingelheim! (Proud maker of Nevirapine. ‘Nevirapine – Give it to Someone You Hate’)
Why? Because: There’s Gonna be no ‘Aids Vaccine,’ after all!
WallStreetJournal: Aids Effort Suffers Big Blow
Note: “Funded by the NIH” means, “Your Tax Money!
Gosh, it’s such a shame to have wasted all of it, huh? If only they could have predicted that injecting people with synthetic proteins from “hiv tests”, would make people come up positive on hiv tests…
Gosh and Bother.
But wait! They did predict it! They even wrote it down:
My letter to PLoS Medicine, and BigGayNews.com, regarding the Aids pogrom. (The PLoS version is shorter, and posted in comments below)
Dear Reader,
Regarding Tara Smith’s PLoS journal entry on Denialism on the Web, I personally have tried to engage Tara Smith in reasonable, factual, point-for-point, issue-specific debate, on her blog,
1. here
2. and here
(There may be more, but I only kept track of these, she posts so much on “denialism,” it’s hard to keep track).
You may review these files, and note that none of my concerns are answered, and are usually deflected by charges of ‘being silly,’ in some manner, or, of course, of being a ‘denialist’.
I hold, and extend, an open invitation to Ms. Smith, or any ‘anti-denialist’ to debate, person to person, by email or phone, on any particular issue relating to Aids. Read the rest of this entry »
Francois Marie Arouet - 18th Century writer, philosopher, and sit-down comedian (satirist) - is better known to all third semester French students as Voltaire. He lived his life in full. Smart, cruel, generous, witty, kind, atheistic, humanistic, misanthropic, absurdist, English-loving Francophobe, Francophilic Parisian; long-suffering, well-rewarded, hunted, despised, and dearly beloved.
He gave to literature some of the strangest confabulations ever seen, even in the modern era - stories of science fiction absurdity - spacemen, giants, deranged civilian populations, plagues, pirates and villains pretending to do public good; and then mystical, perfect (and boring) Edens, soon to be discarded for lustier, more perilous pursuits.
He tried to wrangle out of the human condition some sense, some middle ground, but seemed to enjoy the highs and lows of existence - in his writing, and in reality - more than the simple, quiet life his literary creations claimed to desire.
He gave, in some work or another, or perhaps only in speech, a phrase which echoes in my mind in almost every conversation I have with those defending the various religions of our era - Bird Flu, Aids, Sars, Bombing Iraq for democracy’s sake, etc.
“If you want to converse with me, first define your terms.”
Read the rest of this entry »
The interview covers a great deal of ground in a few mouthfuls. The ICC story, HIV testing, some bird flu propaganda analysis, a little biographical information on yours truly, and some personal philosophy. (See notes at the bottom for further reading in greater detail).
Heather: I’ll say briefly, which is probably a crazy word to use when talking about this issue, but can you briefly explain what the HIV/AIDS myth is or what the alternative theories about HIV and AIDS are that you have been researching and that you have been writing about?
Liam: Yeah sure, AIDS is a brand name. There was a phenomena in this country, in my country, in the United States in the early 80’s in a very small community, the gay community over here.
Vanity Fair is doing its best to help us feel better about whatever it is we’re doing in and to Africa. They’ve painted a rainbow coalition of the bright and brainless to sell us the future vision for a new and improved Africa.
The issue is edited by everybody’s favorite sex-and-death rock and roller, Paul Hewson - that is, Bono - who remembers enough from catechism to know that sex must equal death (at least for poor people - it’s an Irish Catholic thing, you know).
If I’m being cryptic, or bitter, please excuse me.
But do have a look at the article on the miracles of Nevirapine, and tell me what it is that we’re going to do, in actual reality, with these poor folks…
If I am to believe the marketing, I must accept that all the poor and starving in Africa are actually living about as long as Europeans did in the Middle Ages, because they have normative, reproductive sex once in a while.
Read the rest of this entry »
The Group of Eight rich-and-powerful nations have decided to send $60 billion to “fight Aids, TB and Malaria” in Africa.
That will certainly include some anti-TB and -Malaria drugs, but…what about providing sewage reclamation for Soweto, Kampala, and other large cities? Last time I looked, the Uganda Sewerage Corporation provided about 7% of the Kampala region with sewage reclamation. (The rest just go where they live).
Try that in the New York City area in summer, and tell me how it would go…
How about pesticides - DDT - to kill mosquitoes? Well, we did it here for quite some time, (and provided sewage reclamation for everyone) - and lookee, no more malaria.
How much of that money is going to clean water programs? How about infrastructure development?
As far as the “Aids” money - what’s that for but putting rubbers on everyone and keeping the population in check - plus making taxpayers pay for the poisons we call ‘Aids drugs’?
If we’re interested in population control - ie Eugenics - why don’t we just say so? I guess the good, American, “liberal” population might not find that so easy to support.
So, where does the money go, mes amis?
GNN June 2005
ICC) has found that the National Institute of Health (NIH) and Columbia Presbyterian Hospital acted unethically.
The Associated Press reported Thursday June 16th: “The government has concluded at least some AIDS drug experiments involving foster children violated federal rules designed to ensure vulnerable youths were protected from the risks of medical research.”