Shooting War Gen-We Getting A Grip Wolves In Sheep's Clothing




rank: Rebel
points: 145
occupation: Journalist
location: US


Liam Scheff - Writer and Journalist on Politics, History, Race, Class and Culture.

In 2004, I broke open the NIH clinical trial scandal - government researchers testing New York City orphans with combinations of toxic, speculative drugs. My research was used as the basis for the 2004 BBC film "Guinea Pig Kids."

I've been published in city weeklies in New York, Los Angeles and Boston, in the book "Tutto In Ventita" (NewWorlds Media - Italy, 2005), and in other print and web journals.



Email me:

currently reading:

Too much at once, like the rest of you.


Liam Scheff at GNN

More New York Times Bullshit on the AIDS/ICC Scandal

B11385 / Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:21:31 / Media

The Times piece is regurgitated by, without a single fact checked.

contact FrontPageMag


Dear Editor,

Your writer’s (Ryan O’Donnell’s) piece on me and the ICC story is pure garbage,

The Left’s War on Black and Latino Children

but I’m trying not to hold that against you.

The NY Times, which your writer quotes with reckless abandon, had a reason to exclude most of the important facts in their fictitious and easily-disputed report on the ICC story –

On the story they got to long after everybody else – 19 months after it broke.

The basic corrections to your screed, among many, are:

I have no relationship with Indymedia (IMC) – my piece was originally published by – which is an independent news source to be sure, thought in no way affiliated with IMC.

When I was new to the web, I had occasionally used IMC to test run a piece, or to get it up for people to read, if it was in its genesis.

I no longer do that.

The piece was immediately front-paged by the NY Post, which did so scurrilously, without crediting me, even after interviewing me and checking out the facts – (two thing your reporter did not do),

They put in my name to the piece in a slight correction in the following edition (and have done since).

This was followed by publication of my work in the New York Press on three occaisions over the next year or so1and2 – pieces which featured citations from the medical literature, interviews with children and former workers from ICC and:

An interview with the doctor who runs the place, Dr. Catherine Painter, who told me in no uncertain terms how ‘adherence’ to the drug regimen was achieved – surgery through abdomen to stick in a tube3.

I was part of a team that worked on the BBC documentary “Guinea Pig Kids” which aired in the UK and throughout Europe begining last November.

In 2005, the Associated Press independently covered the scandal, and found that orphans were and are being used in drug trials with dangerous drugs througout the country4.

How does this stack up with the notion that no good evidence was provided?

The Times itself validated my story – that orphans were being used in drug trials,

They just decided to spin the results to benefit their advertisers and sponsors – not the least of which is Columbia University – the same organization running the Incarnation Children’s Center orphanage/trial center.

The truth is, there was an embarrasment of spot-on evidence of gross malfeasance provided in my work –

Documents from the National Institutes of Health and from ICC on the drug trials,

from the FDA, medical journals and the drug manufacturers themselves on the very toxic Drugs,

And interviews with parents, caretakers and children on the ravages of the treatment, and the force used in getting the children into ICC and onto the drugs5.

But the Times chose to exclude any and all standard medical report on the drugs that were and are being used on the orphans in ICC, even though the drugs are all black-box labels – meaning they have killed and can be expected to kill or severely damage in regular use.

No AZT study was provided by the New York Times, only a softball pitch to the doctor who set the place up – Dr. Stephen Nicholas – on his opinion of his own work.

They didn’t bother to question Nicholas, the well-funded founder of ICC, on his current Columbia University sponsored work – plying the poor children of the Dominican Republic with AZT, just as he was here in the poverty-stricken corridor of NYC.

Also excluded were:

  • The methods of getting the kids to take the drugs (surgical placement of gastric tubes),
  • Actual results from any clinical trial that used children from ICC, or the unadulterated results of any of these drugs in short or long term use in any children.

Instead, there is a cobbled-together, out-of-context exclamation that since HIV prevelance had decreased in some fashion, than whatever was and is happening at ICC is justified.

Excluded is the reality that through the AIDS continuum in the US, AIDS numbers decreased in every population after 1994 or 1995 –

the years in which single-use (montherapy), high-dose AZT was pulled from patients, after concerns about the increasing volume of morbidity and mortality associated with the drug, and complaints from doctors and patients about the terribly toxic effects of the drug.

The death rate had similarly skyrocketed in the short years immediately after AZT was introduced to the american market as the ‘first AIDS drug.”


The list goes on, and I’ll get around to writing something more comprehensive on this soon.

But your reporter (and editor) should really ask why the Old Gray Mare would stoop to such nasty bits of tabloid journalism – in essence, writing an ad hominem editorial as a front page news item –

Is it because there’s more at stake here than a couple brown-skinned orphans?

You bet your ass there is.

I am the reporter who broke the story because I understood something about what was going on beneath the surface of the AIDS establishment

Get beyond the bike-a-thons and the celebrity fundraisers, and the notion that believing that there is a single cause of infirmity for all gay, black and poor people all around the world is somehow consistent with Gay or Black rights,

And you’ll find the most inept and corrupt branch of science – AIDS incorporated – religion masquerading as medicine –

The notion that clinically-defined illness in certain populations gives us the right to stick a death sentence on those poor bastards unlucky enough to be given those cross-reactive, race selective, and selectively interpretted one-size-fits-none catastrophes we call “HIV tests6and7

And to use their little bodies to pump through a litany of chemicals that we wouldn’t have poured on the Kaiser and his troops in WW1 –

You might have bothered to read at least one drug label before writing this little screed8,

You might have bothered to contact me, the subject of your attack,

Or to read a single word I’d written –

But you didn’t.

You didn’t even read this piece, published just after the NY Times tried to rain acid over the whole thing – a 10-year insider comes out in public, and tells her story, verifying every seedy bit of corruption and degradation imbedded in what we now forgive as AIDS medicine.

Inside Incarnation NY Press Aug 2005

You really should know better, if you’re goal is truly to take the popular culture to task.

As for my ties to the “radical Left” – look for them, and you’ll see they’re pretty weak. Most of my close friends are neither radical nor particularly Left – they are curious, open-minded, compassionate, intelligent and critical people across the political spectrum,

Who also tend to be disappointed with what passes for politics, policy and public discourse in 21st Century America,

And who are trying to do their best to make things a little better where they can.

Contact me for any further corrections,

Liam Scheff


My Original Letter to the NY Times

To my knowledge, the Times has failed to publish a single letter in response to their invective, though many have been sent.

1 Still on Trial April 2005 NY Press

2 Inside Incarnation NY Press Aug 2005

3 The House That AIDS Built

4 Associated Press Investigation spring 05

5 The ICC Investigation Continues – July 2004,

6 On HIV Tests – The Hidden Face of HIV – Knowing is Beautiful

6 and Sex Crimes

7 The medical literature on HIV tests

8 The medical literature on AIDS drugs

terrible bad average good great Vote: vote   Avg: 3.93   Votes: 14   Comments: 7 [Add]


I understand your frustration with the NY Times. Why can they not conceive that AIDS drugs might be toxic, that drugs that can kill people maybe shouldn’t be tested on the vulnerable, that greed may be what is driving drug testing that maybe AIDS won’t be solved by throwing money at drugs and drugs into bodies?

DavidCrowe @ 12/15/05 06:23:47

Thanks Dave,

I think I should point people to your site, and your constantly updated encyclopedic compendia of quotes from the med literature on the drugs and tests.

aids drugs

hiv tests

studies of transmission


Liam @ 12/15/05 10:51:37

I wonder if the Nazis ever blamed the Communists for a war on Jews, Gypsies and homosexuals? Somehow I keep thinking of Bush and Cheney taking about “terrorists” when I read this bullshit.

That it got regurgitated without a fact being checked is not surprising given the state of “journalism.” Had mainstream journalists ever checked facts on “AIDS treatments,” not to mention definitions of “AIDS,” this sham should have been over in the 1980s. I do share your outrage Liam and admire your work.

robin @ 12/15/05 22:20:16

Thanks Robin,

I really do appreciate that.


Liam @ 12/15/05 23:34:37

Liam, I got your message but was denied access to a reply clicking on the link. So I’ll post here. No we have not met. We do have a mutual friend in David. I already spend too much time online avoiding work (writing a PhD) so I have not put anything up on a blog.

I am one of those stupid people who tested regularly for “HIV” even without any real grounds for doing so. I started in the late 80s and it took until 1999 to finally light up the test to non-specific antibodies. Having had many friends die of AZT poisoning in the late 80s/early 90s, and having friends deformed by HAART at the time, I stayed off the “meds” despite regular pressure from my doctor who informed me I would not be a longterm survivor and was “progressing as normal.” A search for naturopathic therapies took me to HEAL Toronto and next thing I was staying up all night reading virusmyth.

At this stage for me there is no “HIV/AIDS debate” just lots of facts I know that the orthodoxy denies, hides or screams hysterically against.

Ken A, Vancouver

robin @ 12/16/05 18:45:23

“Had mainstream journalists ever checked facts on AIDS treatments, not to mention definitions of AIDS, this sham should have been over in the 1980s.”

this statement says volumes. If “journalists” had been doing their jobs in the 80’s (and now), “AIDS” would have been over with many years ago.

notdansavage @ 12/17/05 06:32:35


thanks much for your reply, I’m glad you posted it.

I appreciate you sharing your story, and I certainly understand how you feel.

If the Left (those who claim to care about AIDS) would allow themselves a moment to looked at this thing holisticly – and I mean, widely, without preconception and from a perspective of macroanalysis (rather than fear-mongering),

I think we’d be in a very different place than we are –

I’m glad you figured it out for yourself.

Be well, and stay in touch,


Liam @ 12/17/05 12:54:41


The Yard
content new pending
articles 1 280
headlines 1 2150
links 0 522
video 0 0
photos 0 0
promotions 0 0
articles view add
headlines view add
blog view add
links view add
network view add
profile edit logout

Sign up for the GNN newsletter to get the first word on video premieres and breaking news. signup

Read the GNN FAQ for information about the site, forum rules and other GNN 2.0 information. faq

Optimized for FireFox
To download the Firefox web browser, visit Download Firefox

  • Advertise With GNN
  • SUPPORT GNN! Support GNN


    Buy Our Tees
  • Bloggers' Rights at EFF